Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation
In her 2007 paper, “Argument Has No Function” Jean Goodwin takes exception with what she calls the “explicit function claims”, arguing that not only are function-based accounts of argumentation insufficiently motivated, but they fail to ground claims to normativity. In this paper I stake out the beg...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2011-03-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3013 |
id |
doaj-33aff70c93b24cbc9d190d2dd51cf5d0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-33aff70c93b24cbc9d190d2dd51cf5d02020-11-25T03:24:03ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2011-03-0131110.22329/il.v31i1.3013Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of ArgumentationSteven W Patterson0Marygrove CollegeIn her 2007 paper, “Argument Has No Function” Jean Goodwin takes exception with what she calls the “explicit function claims”, arguing that not only are function-based accounts of argumentation insufficiently motivated, but they fail to ground claims to normativity. In this paper I stake out the beginnings of a functionalist answer to Goodwin.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3013functionalismnormativitysocial goodsrational doxastic coordinationGoodwin |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Steven W Patterson |
spellingShingle |
Steven W Patterson Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation Informal Logic functionalism normativity social goods rational doxastic coordination Goodwin |
author_facet |
Steven W Patterson |
author_sort |
Steven W Patterson |
title |
Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation |
title_short |
Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation |
title_full |
Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation |
title_fullStr |
Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Functionalism, Normativity and the Concept of Argumentation |
title_sort |
functionalism, normativity and the concept of argumentation |
publisher |
University of Windsor |
series |
Informal Logic |
issn |
0824-2577 2293-734X |
publishDate |
2011-03-01 |
description |
In her 2007 paper, “Argument Has No Function” Jean Goodwin takes exception with what she calls the “explicit function claims”, arguing that not only are function-based accounts of argumentation insufficiently motivated, but they fail to ground claims to normativity. In this paper I stake out the beginnings of a functionalist answer to Goodwin. |
topic |
functionalism normativity social goods rational doxastic coordination Goodwin |
url |
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/3013 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stevenwpatterson functionalismnormativityandtheconceptofargumentation |
_version_ |
1724603679339708416 |