Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences

Scope. This review aims to achieve a parallelism between literature studies on imaging diagnosis, the characteristics of cesarean scar defect and its evolution during pregnancy, and the obstetric consequences that can lead to increased maternal morbidity. Materials and Methods. There have been man...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oana D. Balalau, Teodora A. Corbu, Liana Ples, Vasile A. Dumitru, Anca D. Stanescu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Digital ProScholar Media 2018-11-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/archive/2018/3.2/72.76.pdf
id doaj-33a93eb74c44412cb2b2cec50dad9ab0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33a93eb74c44412cb2b2cec50dad9ab02020-11-25T00:41:04ZengDigital ProScholar MediaJournal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery2559-55552018-11-0132727610.25083/2559.5555/3.2/72.76Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequencesOana D. Balalau0Teodora A. CorbuLiana Ples1Vasile A. Dumitru2Anca D. Stanescu3Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, RomaniaCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, RomaniaCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, RomaniaCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, RomaniaScope. This review aims to achieve a parallelism between literature studies on imaging diagnosis, the characteristics of cesarean scar defect and its evolution during pregnancy, and the obstetric consequences that can lead to increased maternal morbidity. Materials and Methods. There have been many literature studies published in recent years aimed to identify the methods of diagnosis for cesarean scar defect, the characteristics and the main changes of it during pregnancy, and the risks undertaken by pregnant women undergoing labor for vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean surgery. Results and Discussions. The most commonly used method for visualizing and evaluating uterine scar is transvaginal ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy, and abdominal ultrasonography in the II and III trimesters. The two areas characteristic of uterine scarring: "niche" and "thickness of the residual myometrium" undergo changes during the three trimesters of pregnancy. Some studies in the literature reported a higher incidence of uterine rupture, especially when the lower uterine segment fell below 2.3 mm, and a mean thickness of 3.2 mm, higher among multiparous women. A question that still does not have a generally valid answer refers to the hysterorrhaphy technique. There are different opinions among the authors, but most of them consider that after a double layer suture the thickness of the residual myometrium is higher. However, data from the literature show that the incidence of complications such as uterine rupture, dehiscence of the uterine trance are similar, regardless of the type of suture used. Another complication that occurs due to uterine scar is the pregnancy inserted at this level, which in the case of expectancy, leads to an increase in maternal and fetal morbidity. 50% of them evolve to spontaneous abortion in the first trimester, and almost all full-term pregnancies result in hysterectomy of necessity. Conclusions. Due to the many obstetrical and gynecological complications that occur on a uterine scar, an evaluation in dynamics is essential. There are no standardized protocols yet, but the identification and measurement of the uterine scar area in the third trimester may predict the chance of success of the labor test for vaginal delivery after cesarean surgery.https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/archive/2018/3.2/72.76.pdf cesarean sectionvaginal birthuterine scar
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oana D. Balalau
Teodora A. Corbu
Liana Ples
Vasile A. Dumitru
Anca D. Stanescu
spellingShingle Oana D. Balalau
Teodora A. Corbu
Liana Ples
Vasile A. Dumitru
Anca D. Stanescu
Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery
cesarean section
vaginal birth
uterine scar
author_facet Oana D. Balalau
Teodora A. Corbu
Liana Ples
Vasile A. Dumitru
Anca D. Stanescu
author_sort Oana D. Balalau
title Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
title_short Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
title_full Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
title_fullStr Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
title_sort cesarean scar defect- obstetric consequences
publisher Digital ProScholar Media
series Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery
issn 2559-5555
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Scope. This review aims to achieve a parallelism between literature studies on imaging diagnosis, the characteristics of cesarean scar defect and its evolution during pregnancy, and the obstetric consequences that can lead to increased maternal morbidity. Materials and Methods. There have been many literature studies published in recent years aimed to identify the methods of diagnosis for cesarean scar defect, the characteristics and the main changes of it during pregnancy, and the risks undertaken by pregnant women undergoing labor for vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean surgery. Results and Discussions. The most commonly used method for visualizing and evaluating uterine scar is transvaginal ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy, and abdominal ultrasonography in the II and III trimesters. The two areas characteristic of uterine scarring: "niche" and "thickness of the residual myometrium" undergo changes during the three trimesters of pregnancy. Some studies in the literature reported a higher incidence of uterine rupture, especially when the lower uterine segment fell below 2.3 mm, and a mean thickness of 3.2 mm, higher among multiparous women. A question that still does not have a generally valid answer refers to the hysterorrhaphy technique. There are different opinions among the authors, but most of them consider that after a double layer suture the thickness of the residual myometrium is higher. However, data from the literature show that the incidence of complications such as uterine rupture, dehiscence of the uterine trance are similar, regardless of the type of suture used. Another complication that occurs due to uterine scar is the pregnancy inserted at this level, which in the case of expectancy, leads to an increase in maternal and fetal morbidity. 50% of them evolve to spontaneous abortion in the first trimester, and almost all full-term pregnancies result in hysterectomy of necessity. Conclusions. Due to the many obstetrical and gynecological complications that occur on a uterine scar, an evaluation in dynamics is essential. There are no standardized protocols yet, but the identification and measurement of the uterine scar area in the third trimester may predict the chance of success of the labor test for vaginal delivery after cesarean surgery.
topic cesarean section
vaginal birth
uterine scar
url https://www.proscholar.org/jcis/archive/2018/3.2/72.76.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT oanadbalalau cesareanscardefectobstetricconsequences
AT teodoraacorbu cesareanscardefectobstetricconsequences
AT lianaples cesareanscardefectobstetricconsequences
AT vasileadumitru cesareanscardefectobstetricconsequences
AT ancadstanescu cesareanscardefectobstetricconsequences
_version_ 1725287334979567616