Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique

The technique used at the time of implantation has a central role in determining the risk of thrombosis in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS). Different definitions of the “optimal” implantation technique exist, however. The impact of individual procedural characteristics on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zisis Dimitriadis, Alberto Polimeni, Remzi Anadol, Martin Geyer, Melissa Weissner, Helen Ullrich, Thomas Münzel, Tommaso Gori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
PSP
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/1/93
id doaj-33785d36ab5f4145afa724129bbdc5c7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-33785d36ab5f4145afa724129bbdc5c72020-11-24T21:59:54ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832019-01-01819310.3390/jcm8010093jcm8010093Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” TechniqueZisis Dimitriadis0Alberto Polimeni1Remzi Anadol2Martin Geyer3Melissa Weissner4Helen Ullrich5Thomas Münzel6Tommaso Gori7Zentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyZentrum für Kardiologie, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, GermanyThe technique used at the time of implantation has a central role in determining the risk of thrombosis in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS). Different definitions of the “optimal” implantation technique exist, however. The impact of individual procedural characteristics on the risk of scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was evaluated in a single-center observational study that enrolled 657 patients (79% males, mean age 63 ± 12 years) with 763 lesions who received a total of 925 BRS for de novo lesions. During a median 1076 (762–1206) days’ follow-up there were 28 cases of thrombosis. Independent predictors of ScT included the use of predilatation balloons bigger than the nominal BRS diameter (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.4 (0.16–0.98), p = 0.04), sizing (implantation in vessels with reference vessel diameter >3.5 mm or <2.5 mm: HR = 5.71 (2.32–14.05), p = 0.0002) and the degree of vessel expansion (ratio of minimum lumen to reference vessel diameter, HR: 0.005 (0.0001–0.23), p = 0.007). In addition, a mild BRS oversizing (final BRS diameter to vessel diameter 1.14–1.28) was associated with a lower thrombosis risk, whereas undersizing and more severe oversizing (final BRS diameter to vessel diameter <1.04 and >1.35, respectively) were associated with an increased risk of ScT (HR = 0.13 (0.02–0.59), p = 0.0007). In conclusion, different components of the “optimal” technique have different impacts on the risk of BRS thrombosis. Besides predilatation with a balloon larger than the BRS diameter, correct vessel size selection and a mild to moderate oversizing appear to be protective.http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/1/93PSPimplantation techniquebioresorbable scaffold
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zisis Dimitriadis
Alberto Polimeni
Remzi Anadol
Martin Geyer
Melissa Weissner
Helen Ullrich
Thomas Münzel
Tommaso Gori
spellingShingle Zisis Dimitriadis
Alberto Polimeni
Remzi Anadol
Martin Geyer
Melissa Weissner
Helen Ullrich
Thomas Münzel
Tommaso Gori
Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique
Journal of Clinical Medicine
PSP
implantation technique
bioresorbable scaffold
author_facet Zisis Dimitriadis
Alberto Polimeni
Remzi Anadol
Martin Geyer
Melissa Weissner
Helen Ullrich
Thomas Münzel
Tommaso Gori
author_sort Zisis Dimitriadis
title Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique
title_short Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique
title_full Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique
title_fullStr Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique
title_full_unstemmed Procedural Predictors for Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Thrombosis: Analysis of the Individual Components of the “PSP” Technique
title_sort procedural predictors for bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: analysis of the individual components of the “psp” technique
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The technique used at the time of implantation has a central role in determining the risk of thrombosis in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BRS). Different definitions of the “optimal” implantation technique exist, however. The impact of individual procedural characteristics on the risk of scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was evaluated in a single-center observational study that enrolled 657 patients (79% males, mean age 63 ± 12 years) with 763 lesions who received a total of 925 BRS for de novo lesions. During a median 1076 (762–1206) days’ follow-up there were 28 cases of thrombosis. Independent predictors of ScT included the use of predilatation balloons bigger than the nominal BRS diameter (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.4 (0.16–0.98), p = 0.04), sizing (implantation in vessels with reference vessel diameter >3.5 mm or <2.5 mm: HR = 5.71 (2.32–14.05), p = 0.0002) and the degree of vessel expansion (ratio of minimum lumen to reference vessel diameter, HR: 0.005 (0.0001–0.23), p = 0.007). In addition, a mild BRS oversizing (final BRS diameter to vessel diameter 1.14–1.28) was associated with a lower thrombosis risk, whereas undersizing and more severe oversizing (final BRS diameter to vessel diameter <1.04 and >1.35, respectively) were associated with an increased risk of ScT (HR = 0.13 (0.02–0.59), p = 0.0007). In conclusion, different components of the “optimal” technique have different impacts on the risk of BRS thrombosis. Besides predilatation with a balloon larger than the BRS diameter, correct vessel size selection and a mild to moderate oversizing appear to be protective.
topic PSP
implantation technique
bioresorbable scaffold
url http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/1/93
work_keys_str_mv AT zisisdimitriadis proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT albertopolimeni proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT remzianadol proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT martingeyer proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT melissaweissner proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT helenullrich proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT thomasmunzel proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
AT tommasogori proceduralpredictorsforbioresorbablevascularscaffoldthrombosisanalysisoftheindividualcomponentsofthepsptechnique
_version_ 1725846601134505984