Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation

This paper gives an overview of principal distinction between the aims of the so-called "traditional" and "progressive" education and respective pedagogies associated with each. The term "traditional" education is used to denote the kind of education that prepares peopl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pantić Nataša
Format: Article
Language:srp
Published: Institute for Educational Research, Belgrade 2007-01-01
Series:Zbornik: Institut za Pedagoška Istraživanja
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0579-6431/2007/0579-64310701007P.pdf
id doaj-337839fcff93481e820c646b0c29b10a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-337839fcff93481e820c646b0c29b10a2020-11-25T02:42:39ZsrpInstitute for Educational Research, BelgradeZbornik: Institut za Pedagoška Istraživanja0579-64311820-92702007-01-0139171910.2298/ZIPI0701007PAims and methods of education: A recapitulationPantić NatašaThis paper gives an overview of principal distinction between the aims of the so-called "traditional" and "progressive" education and respective pedagogies associated with each. The term "traditional" education is used to denote the kind of education that prepares people for their role in society as it is, while the term "progressive" is used for education that aspires to equip mankind with capacity to shape the change of society. The paper raises some critical questions about the role of pedagogy in achieving the aims of the progressive model, arguing that the employment of "progressive" methods does not necessarily guarantee the achievement of the commonly professed purposes of progressive education. This is illustrated in the paper by the results of a study in English schools showing how despite the claim of progressive methods, teachers tend to retain traditional attitudes and on the other hand, how even traditional teaching methods can serve the progressive purpose. This is not to advocate for the traditional pedagogy, but to suggest that it might be something other than pedagogy that makes a critical difference in educating liberal-minded citizens of the future. In this sense the paper explores the role of other factors that make a difference towards progressive education, such as democratization of human relations in school ethos and respect for children's freedom. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0579-6431/2007/0579-64310701007P.pdftraditional and progressive educationeducational aimspedagogydemocratization of schoolsschool ethos
collection DOAJ
language srp
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pantić Nataša
spellingShingle Pantić Nataša
Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation
Zbornik: Institut za Pedagoška Istraživanja
traditional and progressive education
educational aims
pedagogy
democratization of schools
school ethos
author_facet Pantić Nataša
author_sort Pantić Nataša
title Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation
title_short Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation
title_full Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation
title_fullStr Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation
title_full_unstemmed Aims and methods of education: A recapitulation
title_sort aims and methods of education: a recapitulation
publisher Institute for Educational Research, Belgrade
series Zbornik: Institut za Pedagoška Istraživanja
issn 0579-6431
1820-9270
publishDate 2007-01-01
description This paper gives an overview of principal distinction between the aims of the so-called "traditional" and "progressive" education and respective pedagogies associated with each. The term "traditional" education is used to denote the kind of education that prepares people for their role in society as it is, while the term "progressive" is used for education that aspires to equip mankind with capacity to shape the change of society. The paper raises some critical questions about the role of pedagogy in achieving the aims of the progressive model, arguing that the employment of "progressive" methods does not necessarily guarantee the achievement of the commonly professed purposes of progressive education. This is illustrated in the paper by the results of a study in English schools showing how despite the claim of progressive methods, teachers tend to retain traditional attitudes and on the other hand, how even traditional teaching methods can serve the progressive purpose. This is not to advocate for the traditional pedagogy, but to suggest that it might be something other than pedagogy that makes a critical difference in educating liberal-minded citizens of the future. In this sense the paper explores the role of other factors that make a difference towards progressive education, such as democratization of human relations in school ethos and respect for children's freedom.
topic traditional and progressive education
educational aims
pedagogy
democratization of schools
school ethos
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0579-6431/2007/0579-64310701007P.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT panticnatasa aimsandmethodsofeducationarecapitulation
_version_ 1724772423395442688