Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach
Cognitive flexibility helps us to navigate through our ever-changing environment and has often been examined by reversal learning paradigms. Performance in reversal learning can be modeled using computational modeling which allows for the specification of biologically plausible models to infer psych...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2020.536596/full |
id |
doaj-33543470e8364e809aa3da455031b546 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Gereon R. Fink Gereon R. Fink Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann Kerstin Konrad Kerstin Konrad Kerstin Konrad Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther |
spellingShingle |
Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Gereon R. Fink Gereon R. Fink Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann Kerstin Konrad Kerstin Konrad Kerstin Konrad Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach Frontiers in Neuroscience cognitive flexibility executive functioning development reinforcement learning feedback processing |
author_facet |
Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Eileen Oberwelland Weiss Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Jana A. Kruppa Gereon R. Fink Gereon R. Fink Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann Kerstin Konrad Kerstin Konrad Kerstin Konrad Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther Martin Schulte-Rüther |
author_sort |
Eileen Oberwelland Weiss |
title |
Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach |
title_short |
Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach |
title_full |
Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach |
title_fullStr |
Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach |
title_sort |
developmental differences in probabilistic reversal learning: a computational modeling approach |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-453X |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Cognitive flexibility helps us to navigate through our ever-changing environment and has often been examined by reversal learning paradigms. Performance in reversal learning can be modeled using computational modeling which allows for the specification of biologically plausible models to infer psychological mechanisms. Although such models are increasingly used in cognitive neuroscience, developmental approaches are still scarce. Additionally, though most reversal learning paradigms have a comparable design regarding timing and feedback contingencies, the type of feedback differs substantially between studies. The present study used hierarchical Gaussian filter modeling to investigate cognitive flexibility in reversal learning in children and adolescents and the effect of various feedback types. The results demonstrate that children make more overall errors and regressive errors (when a previously learned response rule is chosen instead of the new correct response after the initial shift to the new correct target), but less perseverative errors (when a previously learned response set continues to be used despite a reversal) adolescents. Analyses of the extracted model parameters of the winning model revealed that children seem to use new and conflicting information less readily than adolescents to update their stimulus-reward associations. Furthermore, more subclinical rigidity in everyday life (parent-ratings) is related to less explorative choice behavior during the probabilistic reversal learning task. Taken together, this study provides first-time data on the development of the underlying processes of cognitive flexibility using computational modeling. |
topic |
cognitive flexibility executive functioning development reinforcement learning feedback processing |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2020.536596/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT eileenoberwellandweiss developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT eileenoberwellandweiss developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT eileenoberwellandweiss developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT eileenoberwellandweiss developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT janaakruppa developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT janaakruppa developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT janaakruppa developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT janaakruppa developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT gereonrfink developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT gereonrfink developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT beateherpertzdahlmann developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT kerstinkonrad developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT kerstinkonrad developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT kerstinkonrad developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT martinschulteruther developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT martinschulteruther developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT martinschulteruther developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT martinschulteruther developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach AT martinschulteruther developmentaldifferencesinprobabilisticreversallearningacomputationalmodelingapproach |
_version_ |
1724333675696357376 |
spelling |
doaj-33543470e8364e809aa3da455031b5462021-01-18T05:37:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2021-01-011410.3389/fnins.2020.536596536596Developmental Differences in Probabilistic Reversal Learning: A Computational Modeling ApproachEileen Oberwelland Weiss0Eileen Oberwelland Weiss1Eileen Oberwelland Weiss2Eileen Oberwelland Weiss3Jana A. Kruppa4Jana A. Kruppa5Jana A. Kruppa6Jana A. Kruppa7Gereon R. Fink8Gereon R. Fink9Beate Herpertz-Dahlmann10Kerstin Konrad11Kerstin Konrad12Kerstin Konrad13Martin Schulte-Rüther14Martin Schulte-Rüther15Martin Schulte-Rüther16Martin Schulte-Rüther17Martin Schulte-Rüther18Translational Brain Research in Psychiatry and Neurology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyTranslational Brain Research in Psychiatry and Neurology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, GermanyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyTranslational Brain Research in Psychiatry and Neurology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyCognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-11), Jülich Research Centre, Jülich, GermanyChild Neuropsychology Section, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, GermanyDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyCognitive flexibility helps us to navigate through our ever-changing environment and has often been examined by reversal learning paradigms. Performance in reversal learning can be modeled using computational modeling which allows for the specification of biologically plausible models to infer psychological mechanisms. Although such models are increasingly used in cognitive neuroscience, developmental approaches are still scarce. Additionally, though most reversal learning paradigms have a comparable design regarding timing and feedback contingencies, the type of feedback differs substantially between studies. The present study used hierarchical Gaussian filter modeling to investigate cognitive flexibility in reversal learning in children and adolescents and the effect of various feedback types. The results demonstrate that children make more overall errors and regressive errors (when a previously learned response rule is chosen instead of the new correct response after the initial shift to the new correct target), but less perseverative errors (when a previously learned response set continues to be used despite a reversal) adolescents. Analyses of the extracted model parameters of the winning model revealed that children seem to use new and conflicting information less readily than adolescents to update their stimulus-reward associations. Furthermore, more subclinical rigidity in everyday life (parent-ratings) is related to less explorative choice behavior during the probabilistic reversal learning task. Taken together, this study provides first-time data on the development of the underlying processes of cognitive flexibility using computational modeling.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2020.536596/fullcognitive flexibilityexecutive functioningdevelopmentreinforcement learningfeedback processing |