Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast

Background & objectives: A study was conducted to characterise larval habitats and to determine spatialheterogeneity of the Anopheles mosquito larvae. The study was conducted from May to June 1999 innine villages along the Kenyan coast.Methods: Aquatic habitats were sampled by use of standard di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph M. Mwangangi, Charles M. Mbogo, Ephantus J. Muturi, Joseph G. Nzovu, John I. Githure, Guiyun Yan, Noboru Minakawa, Robert Novak, John C. Beier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2007-03-01
Series:Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/441044.pdf
id doaj-3348a071df124fb5883f4c126ebb7fdf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3348a071df124fb5883f4c126ebb7fdf2020-11-24T22:18:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Vector Borne Diseases0972-90622007-03-014414451Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coastJoseph M. MwangangiCharles M. MbogoEphantus J. MuturiJoseph G. NzovuJohn I. GithureGuiyun YanNoboru MinakawaRobert NovakJohn C. BeierBackground & objectives: A study was conducted to characterise larval habitats and to determine spatialheterogeneity of the Anopheles mosquito larvae. The study was conducted from May to June 1999 innine villages along the Kenyan coast.Methods: Aquatic habitats were sampled by use of standard dipping technique. The habitats werecharacterised based on size, pH, distance to the nearest house, coverage of canopy, surface debris, algaeand emergent plants, turbidity, substrate, and habitat type.Results: A total of 110 aquatic habitats like stream pools (n = 10); puddles (n = 65); tire tracks (n =5); ponds (n = 5) and swamps (n = 25) were sampled in nine villages located in three districts of theKenyan coast. A total of 7,263 Anopheles mosquito larvae were collected, 63.9% were early instarsand 36.1% were late instars. Morphological identification of the III and IV instar larvae by use ofmicroscopy yielded 90.66% (n = 2,377) Anopheles gambiae Complex, 0.88% (n = 23) An. funestus,An. coustani 7.63% (n = 200), An. rivulorum 0.42% (n = 11), An. pharoensis 0.19% (n = 5), An.swahilicus 0.08% (n = 2), An. wilsoni 0.04% (n = 1) and 0.11% (n = 3) were unidentified. A subset ofthe An. gambiae Complex larvae identified morphologically, was further analysed using rDNA-PCRtechnique resulting in 68.22% (n = 1,290) An. gambiae s.s., 7.93% (n = 150) An. arabiensis and 23.85%(n = 451) An. merus. Multiple logistic regression model showed that emergent plants (p = 0.019), andfloating debris (p = 0.038) were the best predictors of An. gambiae larval abundance in these habitats.Interpretation & conclusion: Habitat type, floating debris and emergent plants were found to be thekey factors determining the presence of Anopheles larvae in the habitats. For effective larval control,the type of habitat should be considered and most productive habitat type be given a priority in themosquito abatement programmehttp://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/441044.pdfAnopheles gambiaehabitat characterisationrDNA-PCR techniquespatial heterogeneity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joseph M. Mwangangi
Charles M. Mbogo
Ephantus J. Muturi
Joseph G. Nzovu
John I. Githure
Guiyun Yan
Noboru Minakawa
Robert Novak
John C. Beier
spellingShingle Joseph M. Mwangangi
Charles M. Mbogo
Ephantus J. Muturi
Joseph G. Nzovu
John I. Githure
Guiyun Yan
Noboru Minakawa
Robert Novak
John C. Beier
Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
Anopheles gambiae
habitat characterisation
rDNA-PCR technique
spatial heterogeneity
author_facet Joseph M. Mwangangi
Charles M. Mbogo
Ephantus J. Muturi
Joseph G. Nzovu
John I. Githure
Guiyun Yan
Noboru Minakawa
Robert Novak
John C. Beier
author_sort Joseph M. Mwangangi
title Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
title_short Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
title_full Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
title_fullStr Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
title_full_unstemmed Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
title_sort spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of anopheles larvae along the kenyan coast
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Vector Borne Diseases
issn 0972-9062
publishDate 2007-03-01
description Background & objectives: A study was conducted to characterise larval habitats and to determine spatialheterogeneity of the Anopheles mosquito larvae. The study was conducted from May to June 1999 innine villages along the Kenyan coast.Methods: Aquatic habitats were sampled by use of standard dipping technique. The habitats werecharacterised based on size, pH, distance to the nearest house, coverage of canopy, surface debris, algaeand emergent plants, turbidity, substrate, and habitat type.Results: A total of 110 aquatic habitats like stream pools (n = 10); puddles (n = 65); tire tracks (n =5); ponds (n = 5) and swamps (n = 25) were sampled in nine villages located in three districts of theKenyan coast. A total of 7,263 Anopheles mosquito larvae were collected, 63.9% were early instarsand 36.1% were late instars. Morphological identification of the III and IV instar larvae by use ofmicroscopy yielded 90.66% (n = 2,377) Anopheles gambiae Complex, 0.88% (n = 23) An. funestus,An. coustani 7.63% (n = 200), An. rivulorum 0.42% (n = 11), An. pharoensis 0.19% (n = 5), An.swahilicus 0.08% (n = 2), An. wilsoni 0.04% (n = 1) and 0.11% (n = 3) were unidentified. A subset ofthe An. gambiae Complex larvae identified morphologically, was further analysed using rDNA-PCRtechnique resulting in 68.22% (n = 1,290) An. gambiae s.s., 7.93% (n = 150) An. arabiensis and 23.85%(n = 451) An. merus. Multiple logistic regression model showed that emergent plants (p = 0.019), andfloating debris (p = 0.038) were the best predictors of An. gambiae larval abundance in these habitats.Interpretation & conclusion: Habitat type, floating debris and emergent plants were found to be thekey factors determining the presence of Anopheles larvae in the habitats. For effective larval control,the type of habitat should be considered and most productive habitat type be given a priority in themosquito abatement programme
topic Anopheles gambiae
habitat characterisation
rDNA-PCR technique
spatial heterogeneity
url http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/441044.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT josephmmwangangi spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT charlesmmbogo spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT ephantusjmuturi spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT josephgnzovu spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT johnigithure spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT guiyunyan spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT noboruminakawa spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT robertnovak spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
AT johncbeier spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast
_version_ 1725781976262115328