Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast
Background & objectives: A study was conducted to characterise larval habitats and to determine spatialheterogeneity of the Anopheles mosquito larvae. The study was conducted from May to June 1999 innine villages along the Kenyan coast.Methods: Aquatic habitats were sampled by use of standard di...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2007-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Vector Borne Diseases |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/441044.pdf |
id |
doaj-3348a071df124fb5883f4c126ebb7fdf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-3348a071df124fb5883f4c126ebb7fdf2020-11-24T22:18:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Vector Borne Diseases0972-90622007-03-014414451Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coastJoseph M. MwangangiCharles M. MbogoEphantus J. MuturiJoseph G. NzovuJohn I. GithureGuiyun YanNoboru MinakawaRobert NovakJohn C. BeierBackground & objectives: A study was conducted to characterise larval habitats and to determine spatialheterogeneity of the Anopheles mosquito larvae. The study was conducted from May to June 1999 innine villages along the Kenyan coast.Methods: Aquatic habitats were sampled by use of standard dipping technique. The habitats werecharacterised based on size, pH, distance to the nearest house, coverage of canopy, surface debris, algaeand emergent plants, turbidity, substrate, and habitat type.Results: A total of 110 aquatic habitats like stream pools (n = 10); puddles (n = 65); tire tracks (n =5); ponds (n = 5) and swamps (n = 25) were sampled in nine villages located in three districts of theKenyan coast. A total of 7,263 Anopheles mosquito larvae were collected, 63.9% were early instarsand 36.1% were late instars. Morphological identification of the III and IV instar larvae by use ofmicroscopy yielded 90.66% (n = 2,377) Anopheles gambiae Complex, 0.88% (n = 23) An. funestus,An. coustani 7.63% (n = 200), An. rivulorum 0.42% (n = 11), An. pharoensis 0.19% (n = 5), An.swahilicus 0.08% (n = 2), An. wilsoni 0.04% (n = 1) and 0.11% (n = 3) were unidentified. A subset ofthe An. gambiae Complex larvae identified morphologically, was further analysed using rDNA-PCRtechnique resulting in 68.22% (n = 1,290) An. gambiae s.s., 7.93% (n = 150) An. arabiensis and 23.85%(n = 451) An. merus. Multiple logistic regression model showed that emergent plants (p = 0.019), andfloating debris (p = 0.038) were the best predictors of An. gambiae larval abundance in these habitats.Interpretation & conclusion: Habitat type, floating debris and emergent plants were found to be thekey factors determining the presence of Anopheles larvae in the habitats. For effective larval control,the type of habitat should be considered and most productive habitat type be given a priority in themosquito abatement programmehttp://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/441044.pdfAnopheles gambiaehabitat characterisationrDNA-PCR techniquespatial heterogeneity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joseph M. Mwangangi Charles M. Mbogo Ephantus J. Muturi Joseph G. Nzovu John I. Githure Guiyun Yan Noboru Minakawa Robert Novak John C. Beier |
spellingShingle |
Joseph M. Mwangangi Charles M. Mbogo Ephantus J. Muturi Joseph G. Nzovu John I. Githure Guiyun Yan Noboru Minakawa Robert Novak John C. Beier Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast Journal of Vector Borne Diseases Anopheles gambiae habitat characterisation rDNA-PCR technique spatial heterogeneity |
author_facet |
Joseph M. Mwangangi Charles M. Mbogo Ephantus J. Muturi Joseph G. Nzovu John I. Githure Guiyun Yan Noboru Minakawa Robert Novak John C. Beier |
author_sort |
Joseph M. Mwangangi |
title |
Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast |
title_short |
Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast |
title_full |
Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast |
title_fullStr |
Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of Anopheles larvae along the Kenyan coast |
title_sort |
spatial distribution and habitat characterisation of anopheles larvae along the kenyan coast |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Vector Borne Diseases |
issn |
0972-9062 |
publishDate |
2007-03-01 |
description |
Background & objectives: A study was conducted to characterise larval habitats and to determine spatialheterogeneity of the Anopheles mosquito larvae. The study was conducted from May to June 1999 innine villages along the Kenyan coast.Methods: Aquatic habitats were sampled by use of standard dipping technique. The habitats werecharacterised based on size, pH, distance to the nearest house, coverage of canopy, surface debris, algaeand emergent plants, turbidity, substrate, and habitat type.Results: A total of 110 aquatic habitats like stream pools (n = 10); puddles (n = 65); tire tracks (n =5); ponds (n = 5) and swamps (n = 25) were sampled in nine villages located in three districts of theKenyan coast. A total of 7,263 Anopheles mosquito larvae were collected, 63.9% were early instarsand 36.1% were late instars. Morphological identification of the III and IV instar larvae by use ofmicroscopy yielded 90.66% (n = 2,377) Anopheles gambiae Complex, 0.88% (n = 23) An. funestus,An. coustani 7.63% (n = 200), An. rivulorum 0.42% (n = 11), An. pharoensis 0.19% (n = 5), An.swahilicus 0.08% (n = 2), An. wilsoni 0.04% (n = 1) and 0.11% (n = 3) were unidentified. A subset ofthe An. gambiae Complex larvae identified morphologically, was further analysed using rDNA-PCRtechnique resulting in 68.22% (n = 1,290) An. gambiae s.s., 7.93% (n = 150) An. arabiensis and 23.85%(n = 451) An. merus. Multiple logistic regression model showed that emergent plants (p = 0.019), andfloating debris (p = 0.038) were the best predictors of An. gambiae larval abundance in these habitats.Interpretation & conclusion: Habitat type, floating debris and emergent plants were found to be thekey factors determining the presence of Anopheles larvae in the habitats. For effective larval control,the type of habitat should be considered and most productive habitat type be given a priority in themosquito abatement programme |
topic |
Anopheles gambiae habitat characterisation rDNA-PCR technique spatial heterogeneity |
url |
http://www.mrcindia.org/journal/issues/441044.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT josephmmwangangi spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT charlesmmbogo spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT ephantusjmuturi spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT josephgnzovu spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT johnigithure spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT guiyunyan spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT noboruminakawa spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT robertnovak spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast AT johncbeier spatialdistributionandhabitatcharacterisationofanopheleslarvaealongthekenyancoast |
_version_ |
1725781976262115328 |