Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage

Abstract Objectives We aimed to determine trends and institutional variation in repeat neuroimaging in children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and to identify factors associated with neuroimaging modality (subsequent magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] vs computed tomography [CT]). Methods We c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pradip P. Chaudhari, Jose A. Pineda, Richard G. Bachur, Robinder G. Khemani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12400
id doaj-334186c29e754b0f908c7fa0ce846cf9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-334186c29e754b0f908c7fa0ce846cf92021-04-28T12:02:34ZengWileyJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open2688-11522021-04-0122n/an/a10.1002/emp2.12400Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhagePradip P. Chaudhari0Jose A. Pineda1Richard G. Bachur2Robinder G. Khemani3Division of Emergency and Transport Medicine Children's Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles California USAKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USADivision of Emergency Medicine Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USAKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California Los Angeles California USAAbstract Objectives We aimed to determine trends and institutional variation in repeat neuroimaging in children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and to identify factors associated with neuroimaging modality (subsequent magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] vs computed tomography [CT]). Methods We conducted a retrospective cross‐sectional study of 35 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database. We included children <18 years of age hospitalized from 2010–2019 with intracranial hemorrhage and who underwent a brain CT. We calculated repeat neuroimaging rates by modality and used regression analyses to examine temporal trends. We used hierarchical logistic regression to identify factors associated with subsequent MRI versus repeat CT, controlling for hospital. Results We identified 12,714 children with intracranial hemorrhage, of which 5072 with repeat neuroimaging were studied. Of the 5072 children with repeat neuroimaging, repeat CT was performed in 67.6% (n = 3429) and subsequent MRI in 32.4% (n = 1643). Overall repeat neuroimaging with either a CT or MRI remained similar from 2010–2019 (P = 0.431); however, repeat CT scans significantly decreased (P = 0.001); whereas, MRIs significantly increased (P < 0.001). Repeat neuroimaging by hospital ranged from 20%–80%. After controlling for institution, subsequent MRI was more likely to be used in younger children and children who did not receive hyperosmotic agents, neurosurgical interventions, or intensive care unit admission (all P‐values <0.001). Conclusions We found that repeat neuroimaging rates for children with intracranial hemorrhage vary substantially by institution. We also found that although MRI was increasingly used to re‐image these children, overall repeat neuroimaging rates (CT or MRI) have not decreased over the past decade. Future work to implement optimal utilization of neuroimaging in these children is needed.https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12400brain injuriesdiagnostic imaginghospitalsintracranial hemorrhagesneuroimagingpediatric emergency medicine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pradip P. Chaudhari
Jose A. Pineda
Richard G. Bachur
Robinder G. Khemani
spellingShingle Pradip P. Chaudhari
Jose A. Pineda
Richard G. Bachur
Robinder G. Khemani
Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
brain injuries
diagnostic imaging
hospitals
intracranial hemorrhages
neuroimaging
pediatric emergency medicine
author_facet Pradip P. Chaudhari
Jose A. Pineda
Richard G. Bachur
Robinder G. Khemani
author_sort Pradip P. Chaudhari
title Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
title_short Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
title_full Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
title_fullStr Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
title_sort trends and variation in repeat neuroimaging for children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage
publisher Wiley
series Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open
issn 2688-1152
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Abstract Objectives We aimed to determine trends and institutional variation in repeat neuroimaging in children with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and to identify factors associated with neuroimaging modality (subsequent magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] vs computed tomography [CT]). Methods We conducted a retrospective cross‐sectional study of 35 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database. We included children <18 years of age hospitalized from 2010–2019 with intracranial hemorrhage and who underwent a brain CT. We calculated repeat neuroimaging rates by modality and used regression analyses to examine temporal trends. We used hierarchical logistic regression to identify factors associated with subsequent MRI versus repeat CT, controlling for hospital. Results We identified 12,714 children with intracranial hemorrhage, of which 5072 with repeat neuroimaging were studied. Of the 5072 children with repeat neuroimaging, repeat CT was performed in 67.6% (n = 3429) and subsequent MRI in 32.4% (n = 1643). Overall repeat neuroimaging with either a CT or MRI remained similar from 2010–2019 (P = 0.431); however, repeat CT scans significantly decreased (P = 0.001); whereas, MRIs significantly increased (P < 0.001). Repeat neuroimaging by hospital ranged from 20%–80%. After controlling for institution, subsequent MRI was more likely to be used in younger children and children who did not receive hyperosmotic agents, neurosurgical interventions, or intensive care unit admission (all P‐values <0.001). Conclusions We found that repeat neuroimaging rates for children with intracranial hemorrhage vary substantially by institution. We also found that although MRI was increasingly used to re‐image these children, overall repeat neuroimaging rates (CT or MRI) have not decreased over the past decade. Future work to implement optimal utilization of neuroimaging in these children is needed.
topic brain injuries
diagnostic imaging
hospitals
intracranial hemorrhages
neuroimaging
pediatric emergency medicine
url https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12400
work_keys_str_mv AT pradippchaudhari trendsandvariationinrepeatneuroimagingforchildrenwithtraumaticintracranialhemorrhage
AT joseapineda trendsandvariationinrepeatneuroimagingforchildrenwithtraumaticintracranialhemorrhage
AT richardgbachur trendsandvariationinrepeatneuroimagingforchildrenwithtraumaticintracranialhemorrhage
AT robindergkhemani trendsandvariationinrepeatneuroimagingforchildrenwithtraumaticintracranialhemorrhage
_version_ 1721503553622638592