Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis

Purpose. To compare the capsule edges ultrastructure obtained by two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) platforms and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Setting. Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Italy. Design. Experimental c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniele Tognetto, Chiara De Giacinto, Alberto Armando Perrotta, Tommaso Candian, Alessandro Bova, Silvia Rinaldi, Gianluca Turco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8620150
id doaj-3302bcffddfa4fbf9c395a39b2460904
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3302bcffddfa4fbf9c395a39b24609042020-11-24T21:14:47ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582018-01-01201810.1155/2018/86201508620150Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual CapsulorhexisDaniele Tognetto0Chiara De Giacinto1Alberto Armando Perrotta2Tommaso Candian3Alessandro Bova4Silvia Rinaldi5Gianluca Turco6Eye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Piazza Ospedale 1, 34129 Trieste, ItalyPurpose. To compare the capsule edges ultrastructure obtained by two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) platforms and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Setting. Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Italy. Design. Experimental comparative study. Methods. 150 anterior capsules were collected and divided into three groups as follows: Group 1 (50 capsules) obtained with manual CCC, Groups 2 and 3 (each with 50 capsules) obtained with the Catalys Laser and the LenSx Laser, respectively. All samples were imaged by means of SEM and regularity of the cut surface, and thickness of the capsule edge were evaluated and compared. Results. All femtosecond laser (FSL) capsules were perfectly circular, whereas some alteration of the circular shape was observed in the manual ones. Group 1 showed a smooth and regular capsule edge without any surface irregularity, conversely Groups 2 and 3 showed postage-stamp perforations on the capsule edge. The cut surface irregularity value in Group 2 was 1.4 ± 0.63, while it was 0.7 ± 0.49 in Group 3 (p<0.05). Group 1 had a significantly lower thickness of the capsule edge than the FSL groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference in the capsule edge thickness between the FSL groups was found (p=0.244). Conclusions. Despite the presence of slight cut surface irregularities, both FSL capsulotomies showed a better geometry and circularity than the manual ones. Capsulotomy specimens obtained using both FSL capsulotomies showed laser-induced alterations of the capsule edge when compared with smooth and regular edges obtained using manual CCC.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8620150
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniele Tognetto
Chiara De Giacinto
Alberto Armando Perrotta
Tommaso Candian
Alessandro Bova
Silvia Rinaldi
Gianluca Turco
spellingShingle Daniele Tognetto
Chiara De Giacinto
Alberto Armando Perrotta
Tommaso Candian
Alessandro Bova
Silvia Rinaldi
Gianluca Turco
Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Daniele Tognetto
Chiara De Giacinto
Alberto Armando Perrotta
Tommaso Candian
Alessandro Bova
Silvia Rinaldi
Gianluca Turco
author_sort Daniele Tognetto
title Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
title_short Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
title_full Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
title_fullStr Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
title_full_unstemmed Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis
title_sort scanning electron microscopy analysis of the anterior capsulotomy edge: a comparative study between femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy and manual capsulorhexis
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Purpose. To compare the capsule edges ultrastructure obtained by two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) platforms and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Setting. Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Italy. Design. Experimental comparative study. Methods. 150 anterior capsules were collected and divided into three groups as follows: Group 1 (50 capsules) obtained with manual CCC, Groups 2 and 3 (each with 50 capsules) obtained with the Catalys Laser and the LenSx Laser, respectively. All samples were imaged by means of SEM and regularity of the cut surface, and thickness of the capsule edge were evaluated and compared. Results. All femtosecond laser (FSL) capsules were perfectly circular, whereas some alteration of the circular shape was observed in the manual ones. Group 1 showed a smooth and regular capsule edge without any surface irregularity, conversely Groups 2 and 3 showed postage-stamp perforations on the capsule edge. The cut surface irregularity value in Group 2 was 1.4 ± 0.63, while it was 0.7 ± 0.49 in Group 3 (p<0.05). Group 1 had a significantly lower thickness of the capsule edge than the FSL groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference in the capsule edge thickness between the FSL groups was found (p=0.244). Conclusions. Despite the presence of slight cut surface irregularities, both FSL capsulotomies showed a better geometry and circularity than the manual ones. Capsulotomy specimens obtained using both FSL capsulotomies showed laser-induced alterations of the capsule edge when compared with smooth and regular edges obtained using manual CCC.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8620150
work_keys_str_mv AT danieletognetto scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
AT chiaradegiacinto scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
AT albertoarmandoperrotta scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
AT tommasocandian scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
AT alessandrobova scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
AT silviarinaldi scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
AT gianlucaturco scanningelectronmicroscopyanalysisoftheanteriorcapsulotomyedgeacomparativestudybetweenfemtosecondlaserassistedcapsulotomyandmanualcapsulorhexis
_version_ 1716746191503360000