Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ?
This article will study the role of base-manuscripts in contemporary editions of middle French texts. More specifically, it will consider the value of the external analysis of a manuscript, and assess its editorial relevance. We will focus on the following criteria : technology (manuscript vs printe...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Société de Langues et de Littératures Médiévales d'Oc et d'Oil
2012-09-01
|
Series: | Perspectives Médiévales |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/peme/334 |
id |
doaj-32f7c649375f40c580219dfd146050ae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-32f7c649375f40c580219dfd146050ae2020-11-25T01:36:35ZengSociété de Langues et de Littératures Médiévales d'Oc et d'OilPerspectives Médiévales2262-55342012-09-013410.4000/peme.334Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ?Olivier DelsauxTania Van HemelryckThis article will study the role of base-manuscripts in contemporary editions of middle French texts. More specifically, it will consider the value of the external analysis of a manuscript, and assess its editorial relevance. We will focus on the following criteria : technology (manuscript vs printed book), technique, medium, calligraphy, illustration, craftsman, first owner, dedicatee, reader. By doing so, this article will illustrate how auxiliary sciences for book history have influenced the theoretical and practical frames of French philology in the past three decades.http://journals.openedition.org/peme/334text editionprinted bookmanuscriptphilologystemma |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olivier Delsaux Tania Van Hemelryck |
spellingShingle |
Olivier Delsaux Tania Van Hemelryck Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ? Perspectives Médiévales text edition printed book manuscript philology stemma |
author_facet |
Olivier Delsaux Tania Van Hemelryck |
author_sort |
Olivier Delsaux |
title |
Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ? |
title_short |
Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ? |
title_full |
Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ? |
title_fullStr |
Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou La précaution inutile ? |
title_sort |
réflexions sur le choix du manuscrit de base aujourd’hui ou la précaution inutile ? |
publisher |
Société de Langues et de Littératures Médiévales d'Oc et d'Oil |
series |
Perspectives Médiévales |
issn |
2262-5534 |
publishDate |
2012-09-01 |
description |
This article will study the role of base-manuscripts in contemporary editions of middle French texts. More specifically, it will consider the value of the external analysis of a manuscript, and assess its editorial relevance. We will focus on the following criteria : technology (manuscript vs printed book), technique, medium, calligraphy, illustration, craftsman, first owner, dedicatee, reader. By doing so, this article will illustrate how auxiliary sciences for book history have influenced the theoretical and practical frames of French philology in the past three decades. |
topic |
text edition printed book manuscript philology stemma |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/peme/334 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olivierdelsaux reflexionssurlechoixdumanuscritdebaseaujourdhuioulaprecautioninutile AT taniavanhemelryck reflexionssurlechoixdumanuscritdebaseaujourdhuioulaprecautioninutile |
_version_ |
1725062134134472704 |