Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study

Objective. The aim of the present study was to explore the current practice and its barriers to an early antimicrobial conversion from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) therapy among hospitalized patients. Method. Hospital based prospective observational study was conducted to assess the practice of an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alemseged Beyene Berha, Gizat Molla Kassie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7847354
id doaj-32ede6f9cfc145309642e81a1db96bda
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32ede6f9cfc145309642e81a1db96bda2020-11-25T00:12:03ZengHindawi LimitedInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases1687-708X1687-70982019-01-01201910.1155/2019/78473547847354Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational StudyAlemseged Beyene Berha0Gizat Molla Kassie1B.Pharm, MSc, Assistant Professor of Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Unit, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, EthiopiaClinical Pharmacist and Lecturer, Department of Pharmacy, College of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Jimma University, EthiopiaObjective. The aim of the present study was to explore the current practice and its barriers to an early antimicrobial conversion from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) therapy among hospitalized patients. Method. Hospital based prospective observational study was conducted to assess the practice of an early antimicrobial IV to PO conversion and its barriers using medical chart and case-specific physicians’ interviews, respectively, from February to September, 2014. Patient charts and medication records were reviewed for appropriateness of IV to PO conversion program every 24hrs using a pretested data collection abstraction format. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the duration of therapy and time to clinical stability between converted and nonconverted patients. Two-tailed P values of < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Results. One hundred forty-two patients were included in the study, of whom two-thirds (67.6%) of the patients were eligible for IV to PO antimicrobial conversion. However, only 20.9% of patients’ timely conversion was made. A shorter duration of IV therapy was recorded for converted (2.80±1.87) versus nonconverted patients (8.50±6.32), (P=0.009). The most important barriers of not converting IV to PO in clinically stable patients were presence of comorbidity; clinicians perceived that the patient should always complete IV course of antimicrobials as a standard practice. Conclusion. Conversion from IV to PO antimicrobials was found to be unnecessarily delayed in a significant proportion of patients hospitalized with moderate to severe infection due to a range of different barriers. Addressing these issues has the potential to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use and resistance.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7847354
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alemseged Beyene Berha
Gizat Molla Kassie
spellingShingle Alemseged Beyene Berha
Gizat Molla Kassie
Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
author_facet Alemseged Beyene Berha
Gizat Molla Kassie
author_sort Alemseged Beyene Berha
title Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study
title_short Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study
title_full Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study
title_fullStr Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Current Practice and Barriers to an Early Antimicrobial Conversion from Intravenous to Oral among Hospitalized Patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital: Prospective Observational Study
title_sort current practice and barriers to an early antimicrobial conversion from intravenous to oral among hospitalized patients at jimma university specialized hospital: prospective observational study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
issn 1687-708X
1687-7098
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective. The aim of the present study was to explore the current practice and its barriers to an early antimicrobial conversion from intravenous (IV) to oral (PO) therapy among hospitalized patients. Method. Hospital based prospective observational study was conducted to assess the practice of an early antimicrobial IV to PO conversion and its barriers using medical chart and case-specific physicians’ interviews, respectively, from February to September, 2014. Patient charts and medication records were reviewed for appropriateness of IV to PO conversion program every 24hrs using a pretested data collection abstraction format. Independent samples t-test was used to compare the duration of therapy and time to clinical stability between converted and nonconverted patients. Two-tailed P values of < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant. Results. One hundred forty-two patients were included in the study, of whom two-thirds (67.6%) of the patients were eligible for IV to PO antimicrobial conversion. However, only 20.9% of patients’ timely conversion was made. A shorter duration of IV therapy was recorded for converted (2.80±1.87) versus nonconverted patients (8.50±6.32), (P=0.009). The most important barriers of not converting IV to PO in clinically stable patients were presence of comorbidity; clinicians perceived that the patient should always complete IV course of antimicrobials as a standard practice. Conclusion. Conversion from IV to PO antimicrobials was found to be unnecessarily delayed in a significant proportion of patients hospitalized with moderate to severe infection due to a range of different barriers. Addressing these issues has the potential to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial use and resistance.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/7847354
work_keys_str_mv AT alemsegedbeyeneberha currentpracticeandbarrierstoanearlyantimicrobialconversionfromintravenoustooralamonghospitalizedpatientsatjimmauniversityspecializedhospitalprospectiveobservationalstudy
AT gizatmollakassie currentpracticeandbarrierstoanearlyantimicrobialconversionfromintravenoustooralamonghospitalizedpatientsatjimmauniversityspecializedhospitalprospectiveobservationalstudy
_version_ 1725401517492535296