Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele

Summary Objective Noncoding alleles of the fat mass and obesity‐associated (FTO) gene have been associated with obesity risk, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Risk allele carriers show alterations in brain structure and function, but previous studies have not disassociated the effects o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia Lugo‐Candelas, Yajing Pang, Seonjoo Lee, Jiook Cha, Susie Hong, Lisa Ranzenhofer, Rachel Korn, Haley Davis, Hailey McInerny, Janet Schebendach, Wendy K. Chung, Rudolph L. Leibel, B. Timothy Walsh, Jonathan Posner, Michael Rosenbaum, Laurel Mayer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Obesity Science & Practice
Subjects:
FTO
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.417
id doaj-32d56b801d8e44ee90cbe58ab5504a20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32d56b801d8e44ee90cbe58ab5504a202020-11-25T03:21:28ZengWileyObesity Science & Practice2055-22382020-08-016440942410.1002/osp4.417Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk alleleClaudia Lugo‐Candelas0Yajing Pang1Seonjoo Lee2Jiook Cha3Susie Hong4Lisa Ranzenhofer5Rachel Korn6Haley Davis7Hailey McInerny8Janet Schebendach9Wendy K. Chung10Rudolph L. Leibel11B. Timothy Walsh12Jonathan Posner13Michael Rosenbaum14Laurel Mayer15Department of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USAThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation University of Electronic Science and Technology of China Chengdu ChinaNew York State Psychiatric Institute New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USANew York State Psychiatric Institute New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Pediatrics Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Pediatrics Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USANew York State Psychiatric Institute New York New York USADepartment of Psychiatry Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USASummary Objective Noncoding alleles of the fat mass and obesity‐associated (FTO) gene have been associated with obesity risk, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Risk allele carriers show alterations in brain structure and function, but previous studies have not disassociated the effects of genotype from those of body mass index (BMI). Methods Differences in brain structure and function were examined in children without obesity grouped by their number of copies (0,1,2) of the FTO obesity‐risk single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1421085. One hundred five 5‐ to 10‐year‐olds (5th–95th percentile body fat) were eligible to participate. Usable scans were obtained from 93 participants (15 CC [homozygous risk], 31 CT [heterozygous] and 47 TT [homozygous low risk]). Results Homozygous C allele carriers (CCs) showed greater grey matter volume in the cerebellum and temporal fusiform gyrus. CCs also demonstrated increased bilateral cerebellar white matter fibre density and increased resting‐state functional connectivity between the bilateral cerebellum and regions in the frontotemporal cortices. Conclusions This is the first study to examine brain structure and function related to FTO alleles in young children not yet manifesting obesity. This study lends support to the notion that the cerebellum may be involved in FTO‐related risk for obesity, yet replication and further longitudinal study are required.https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.417childrenFTOimagingobesity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claudia Lugo‐Candelas
Yajing Pang
Seonjoo Lee
Jiook Cha
Susie Hong
Lisa Ranzenhofer
Rachel Korn
Haley Davis
Hailey McInerny
Janet Schebendach
Wendy K. Chung
Rudolph L. Leibel
B. Timothy Walsh
Jonathan Posner
Michael Rosenbaum
Laurel Mayer
spellingShingle Claudia Lugo‐Candelas
Yajing Pang
Seonjoo Lee
Jiook Cha
Susie Hong
Lisa Ranzenhofer
Rachel Korn
Haley Davis
Hailey McInerny
Janet Schebendach
Wendy K. Chung
Rudolph L. Leibel
B. Timothy Walsh
Jonathan Posner
Michael Rosenbaum
Laurel Mayer
Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele
Obesity Science & Practice
children
FTO
imaging
obesity
author_facet Claudia Lugo‐Candelas
Yajing Pang
Seonjoo Lee
Jiook Cha
Susie Hong
Lisa Ranzenhofer
Rachel Korn
Haley Davis
Hailey McInerny
Janet Schebendach
Wendy K. Chung
Rudolph L. Leibel
B. Timothy Walsh
Jonathan Posner
Michael Rosenbaum
Laurel Mayer
author_sort Claudia Lugo‐Candelas
title Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele
title_short Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele
title_full Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele
title_fullStr Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele
title_full_unstemmed Differences in brain structure and function in children with the FTO obesity‐risk allele
title_sort differences in brain structure and function in children with the fto obesity‐risk allele
publisher Wiley
series Obesity Science & Practice
issn 2055-2238
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Summary Objective Noncoding alleles of the fat mass and obesity‐associated (FTO) gene have been associated with obesity risk, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Risk allele carriers show alterations in brain structure and function, but previous studies have not disassociated the effects of genotype from those of body mass index (BMI). Methods Differences in brain structure and function were examined in children without obesity grouped by their number of copies (0,1,2) of the FTO obesity‐risk single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs1421085. One hundred five 5‐ to 10‐year‐olds (5th–95th percentile body fat) were eligible to participate. Usable scans were obtained from 93 participants (15 CC [homozygous risk], 31 CT [heterozygous] and 47 TT [homozygous low risk]). Results Homozygous C allele carriers (CCs) showed greater grey matter volume in the cerebellum and temporal fusiform gyrus. CCs also demonstrated increased bilateral cerebellar white matter fibre density and increased resting‐state functional connectivity between the bilateral cerebellum and regions in the frontotemporal cortices. Conclusions This is the first study to examine brain structure and function related to FTO alleles in young children not yet manifesting obesity. This study lends support to the notion that the cerebellum may be involved in FTO‐related risk for obesity, yet replication and further longitudinal study are required.
topic children
FTO
imaging
obesity
url https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.417
work_keys_str_mv AT claudialugocandelas differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT yajingpang differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT seonjoolee differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT jiookcha differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT susiehong differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT lisaranzenhofer differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT rachelkorn differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT haleydavis differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT haileymcinerny differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT janetschebendach differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT wendykchung differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT rudolphlleibel differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT btimothywalsh differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT jonathanposner differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT michaelrosenbaum differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
AT laurelmayer differencesinbrainstructureandfunctioninchildrenwiththeftoobesityriskallele
_version_ 1724614516476477440