Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows

The occurrence of phytoplasmas associated with Elm Yellows (EY) was investigated in the reproductive structures (flowers, unripe and ripe fruits) of two EY-infected trees of the hybrid elm clone Lobel and two healthy trees, an Ulmus laevis and an U. japonica. Phytoplasma group-specific Polymerase Ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Sfalanga, E. Bertelli, G. Surico, S. Tegli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2002-12-01
Series:Phytopathologia Mediterranea
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/4975
id doaj-32cdf997ac2648d4a13ab425670a6011
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32cdf997ac2648d4a13ab425670a60112020-11-25T03:46:27ZengFirenze University PressPhytopathologia Mediterranea0031-94651593-20952002-12-0141310.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16701666Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm YellowsA. SfalangaE. BertelliG. SuricoS. TegliThe occurrence of phytoplasmas associated with Elm Yellows (EY) was investigated in the reproductive structures (flowers, unripe and ripe fruits) of two EY-infected trees of the hybrid elm clone Lobel and two healthy trees, an Ulmus laevis and an U. japonica. Phytoplasma group-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and sequencing of amplified fragments were carried out using as template DNA extracted from these reproductive structures. The flowers and fruits were dissected into parts (the flowers into anthers and ovaries, the fruits into seeds and membranaceous wings), and then examined separately. A total of 350 seeds from infected trees were sown, producing 24 plantlets, which were sampled for EY phytoplasma DNA one and five months after germination. Both flowers and seeds from the EY-infected trees were good sources for the extraction and PCR-amplification of EY phytoplasmas, but no EY phytoplasmas were detected in either the flowers and seeds of the two healthy trees or in samples collected from the 24 plantlets grown from seed.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/4975
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Sfalanga
E. Bertelli
G. Surico
S. Tegli
spellingShingle A. Sfalanga
E. Bertelli
G. Surico
S. Tegli
Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows
Phytopathologia Mediterranea
author_facet A. Sfalanga
E. Bertelli
G. Surico
S. Tegli
author_sort A. Sfalanga
title Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows
title_short Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows
title_full Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows
title_fullStr Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows
title_full_unstemmed Detection of phytoplasmal DNA in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with Elm Yellows
title_sort detection of phytoplasmal dna in flowers and seeds from elm trees infected with elm yellows
publisher Firenze University Press
series Phytopathologia Mediterranea
issn 0031-9465
1593-2095
publishDate 2002-12-01
description The occurrence of phytoplasmas associated with Elm Yellows (EY) was investigated in the reproductive structures (flowers, unripe and ripe fruits) of two EY-infected trees of the hybrid elm clone Lobel and two healthy trees, an Ulmus laevis and an U. japonica. Phytoplasma group-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and sequencing of amplified fragments were carried out using as template DNA extracted from these reproductive structures. The flowers and fruits were dissected into parts (the flowers into anthers and ovaries, the fruits into seeds and membranaceous wings), and then examined separately. A total of 350 seeds from infected trees were sown, producing 24 plantlets, which were sampled for EY phytoplasma DNA one and five months after germination. Both flowers and seeds from the EY-infected trees were good sources for the extraction and PCR-amplification of EY phytoplasmas, but no EY phytoplasmas were detected in either the flowers and seeds of the two healthy trees or in samples collected from the 24 plantlets grown from seed.
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/4975
work_keys_str_mv AT asfalanga detectionofphytoplasmaldnainflowersandseedsfromelmtreesinfectedwithelmyellows
AT ebertelli detectionofphytoplasmaldnainflowersandseedsfromelmtreesinfectedwithelmyellows
AT gsurico detectionofphytoplasmaldnainflowersandseedsfromelmtreesinfectedwithelmyellows
AT stegli detectionofphytoplasmaldnainflowersandseedsfromelmtreesinfectedwithelmyellows
_version_ 1724506395621982208