Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology

Abstract Background It has been proved that multi-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) vessel wall imaging could be used to characterize carotid vulnerable plaque components according to the signal intensity on different contrast images. The signal intensity of plaque components is mainl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huiyu Qiao, Dongye Li, Jingli Cao, Haikun Qi, Yongjun Han, Hualu Han, Huimin Xu, Tao Wang, Shuo Chen, Huijun Chen, Yajie Wang, Xihai Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12968-020-00624-0
id doaj-32a713adab604cdc897133ea1115dfaa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32a713adab604cdc897133ea1115dfaa2020-11-25T03:19:21ZengBMCJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1532-429X2020-05-0122111110.1186/s12968-020-00624-0Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histologyHuiyu Qiao0Dongye Li1Jingli Cao2Haikun Qi3Yongjun Han4Hualu Han5Huimin Xu6Tao Wang7Shuo Chen8Huijun Chen9Yajie Wang10Xihai Zhao11Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversitySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College LondonCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of MedicineCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third HospitalCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of MedicineCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of MedicineDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical UniversityCenter for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University School of MedicineAbstract Background It has been proved that multi-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) vessel wall imaging could be used to characterize carotid vulnerable plaque components according to the signal intensity on different contrast images. The signal intensity of plaque components is mainly dependent on the values of T1 and T2 relaxation. T1 mapping recently showed a potential in identifying plaque components but it is not well validated by histology. This study aimed to validate the usefulness of in vivo T1 mapping in assessing carotid vulnerable plaque components by histology. Methods Thirty-four subjects (mean age, 64.0 ± 8.9 years; 26 males) with carotid plaques referred to carotid endarterectomy were prospectively enrolled and underwent 3 T CMR imaging from May 2017 to October 2017. The T1 values of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), necrotic core (NC) and loose matrix (LM) which were identified on multi-contrast vessel wall images or histology were measured on in-vivo T1 mapping. The IPHs were divided into two types based on the proportion of the area of fresh hemorrhage on histology. The T1 values of different plaque components were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and the agreement between T1 mapping and histology in identifying and quantifying IPH was analyzed with Cohen’s Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Of 34 subjects, 19 had histological specimens matched with CMR imaging. The mean T1 values of IPH (651 ± 253 ms), NC (1161 ± 182 ms) and LM (1447 ± 310 ms) identified by histology were significantly different. The T1 values of Type 1 IPH were significantly shorter than that of Type 2 IPH (456 ± 193 ms vs. 775 ± 205 ms, p < 0.001). Moderate to excellent agreement was found in identification (kappa = 0.51, p < 0.001), classification (kappa = 0.40, p = 0.028) and segmentation (ICC = 0.816, 95% CI 0.679–0.894) of IPHs between T1 mapping and histology. Conclusions The T1 values of carotid plaque components, particularly for intraplaque hemorrhage, are differentiable, and the stage of intraplaque hemorrhage can be classified according to T1 values, suggesting the potential capability of assessment of vulnerable plaque components by T1 mapping.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12968-020-00624-0Carotid arteryAtherosclerosisIntraplaque hemorrhageT1 mappingMagnetic resonance imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huiyu Qiao
Dongye Li
Jingli Cao
Haikun Qi
Yongjun Han
Hualu Han
Huimin Xu
Tao Wang
Shuo Chen
Huijun Chen
Yajie Wang
Xihai Zhao
spellingShingle Huiyu Qiao
Dongye Li
Jingli Cao
Haikun Qi
Yongjun Han
Hualu Han
Huimin Xu
Tao Wang
Shuo Chen
Huijun Chen
Yajie Wang
Xihai Zhao
Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Carotid artery
Atherosclerosis
Intraplaque hemorrhage
T1 mapping
Magnetic resonance imaging
author_facet Huiyu Qiao
Dongye Li
Jingli Cao
Haikun Qi
Yongjun Han
Hualu Han
Huimin Xu
Tao Wang
Shuo Chen
Huijun Chen
Yajie Wang
Xihai Zhao
author_sort Huiyu Qiao
title Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
title_short Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
title_full Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
title_sort quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo t1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology
publisher BMC
series Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
issn 1532-429X
publishDate 2020-05-01
description Abstract Background It has been proved that multi-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) vessel wall imaging could be used to characterize carotid vulnerable plaque components according to the signal intensity on different contrast images. The signal intensity of plaque components is mainly dependent on the values of T1 and T2 relaxation. T1 mapping recently showed a potential in identifying plaque components but it is not well validated by histology. This study aimed to validate the usefulness of in vivo T1 mapping in assessing carotid vulnerable plaque components by histology. Methods Thirty-four subjects (mean age, 64.0 ± 8.9 years; 26 males) with carotid plaques referred to carotid endarterectomy were prospectively enrolled and underwent 3 T CMR imaging from May 2017 to October 2017. The T1 values of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), necrotic core (NC) and loose matrix (LM) which were identified on multi-contrast vessel wall images or histology were measured on in-vivo T1 mapping. The IPHs were divided into two types based on the proportion of the area of fresh hemorrhage on histology. The T1 values of different plaque components were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and the agreement between T1 mapping and histology in identifying and quantifying IPH was analyzed with Cohen’s Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results Of 34 subjects, 19 had histological specimens matched with CMR imaging. The mean T1 values of IPH (651 ± 253 ms), NC (1161 ± 182 ms) and LM (1447 ± 310 ms) identified by histology were significantly different. The T1 values of Type 1 IPH were significantly shorter than that of Type 2 IPH (456 ± 193 ms vs. 775 ± 205 ms, p < 0.001). Moderate to excellent agreement was found in identification (kappa = 0.51, p < 0.001), classification (kappa = 0.40, p = 0.028) and segmentation (ICC = 0.816, 95% CI 0.679–0.894) of IPHs between T1 mapping and histology. Conclusions The T1 values of carotid plaque components, particularly for intraplaque hemorrhage, are differentiable, and the stage of intraplaque hemorrhage can be classified according to T1 values, suggesting the potential capability of assessment of vulnerable plaque components by T1 mapping.
topic Carotid artery
Atherosclerosis
Intraplaque hemorrhage
T1 mapping
Magnetic resonance imaging
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12968-020-00624-0
work_keys_str_mv AT huiyuqiao quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT dongyeli quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT jinglicao quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT haikunqi quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT yongjunhan quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT hualuhan quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT huiminxu quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT taowang quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT shuochen quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT huijunchen quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT yajiewang quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
AT xihaizhao quantitativeevaluationofcarotidatheroscleroticvulnerableplaquesusinginvivot1mappingcardiovascularmagneticresonaoncevalidationbyhistology
_version_ 1724622971707850752