The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect
Recent literature has demonstrated that hand position can affect visual processing, a set of phenomena termed Near Hand Effects (NHEs). Across four studies we looked for single-hand NHEs on a large screen when participants were asked to discriminate stimuli based on size, colour, and orientation (St...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of California Press
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Collabra: Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.collabra.org/articles/167 |
id |
doaj-32a5e61936ae42ff83afc93ce093ed9e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-32a5e61936ae42ff83afc93ce093ed9e2020-11-24T23:56:39ZengUniversity of California PressCollabra: Psychology2474-73942018-07-014110.1525/collabra.16795The Fragility of the Near-Hand EffectJill A. Dosso0Alan Kingstone1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCDepartment of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCRecent literature has demonstrated that hand position can affect visual processing, a set of phenomena termed Near Hand Effects (NHEs). Across four studies we looked for single-hand NHEs on a large screen when participants were asked to discriminate stimuli based on size, colour, and orientation (Study 1), to detect stimuli after a manipulation of hand shaping (Study 2), to detect stimuli after the introduction of a peripheral cue (Study 3), and finally to detect stimuli after a manipulation of screen orientation (Study 4). Each study failed to find a NHE. Further examination of the pooled data using a Bayesian analysis also failed to reveal positive evidence for faster responses or larger cueing effects near a hand. These findings suggest that at least some NHEs may be surprisingly fragile, which dovetails with the recent proposition that NHEs may not form a unitary set of phenomena (Gozli & Deng, 2018). The implication is that visual processing may be less sensitive to hand position across measurement techniques than previously thought, and points to a need for well-powered, methodologically rigorous studies on this topic in the future.https://www.collabra.org/articles/167near hand effectattentionembodimenthand posturecueing effect |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jill A. Dosso Alan Kingstone |
spellingShingle |
Jill A. Dosso Alan Kingstone The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect Collabra: Psychology near hand effect attention embodiment hand posture cueing effect |
author_facet |
Jill A. Dosso Alan Kingstone |
author_sort |
Jill A. Dosso |
title |
The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect |
title_short |
The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect |
title_full |
The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect |
title_fullStr |
The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Fragility of the Near-Hand Effect |
title_sort |
fragility of the near-hand effect |
publisher |
University of California Press |
series |
Collabra: Psychology |
issn |
2474-7394 |
publishDate |
2018-07-01 |
description |
Recent literature has demonstrated that hand position can affect visual processing, a set of phenomena termed Near Hand Effects (NHEs). Across four studies we looked for single-hand NHEs on a large screen when participants were asked to discriminate stimuli based on size, colour, and orientation (Study 1), to detect stimuli after a manipulation of hand shaping (Study 2), to detect stimuli after the introduction of a peripheral cue (Study 3), and finally to detect stimuli after a manipulation of screen orientation (Study 4). Each study failed to find a NHE. Further examination of the pooled data using a Bayesian analysis also failed to reveal positive evidence for faster responses or larger cueing effects near a hand. These findings suggest that at least some NHEs may be surprisingly fragile, which dovetails with the recent proposition that NHEs may not form a unitary set of phenomena (Gozli & Deng, 2018). The implication is that visual processing may be less sensitive to hand position across measurement techniques than previously thought, and points to a need for well-powered, methodologically rigorous studies on this topic in the future. |
topic |
near hand effect attention embodiment hand posture cueing effect |
url |
https://www.collabra.org/articles/167 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jilladosso thefragilityofthenearhandeffect AT alankingstone thefragilityofthenearhandeffect AT jilladosso fragilityofthenearhandeffect AT alankingstone fragilityofthenearhandeffect |
_version_ |
1725457306847543296 |