Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods

Background: The aim of the present study was to assess the qualitative indices and enhancement rate of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism using Test bolus and Bolus-tracking techniques. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with suspe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Moradi, Babak Khalili
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Advanced Biomedical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=113;epage=113;aulast=Moradi
id doaj-329a31c700a045759871883a7fe4b3b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-329a31c700a045759871883a7fe4b3b52020-11-24T22:27:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAdvanced Biomedical Research2277-91752016-01-015111311310.4103/2277-9175.184309Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methodsMaryam MoradiBabak KhaliliBackground: The aim of the present study was to assess the qualitative indices and enhancement rate of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism using Test bolus and Bolus-tracking techniques. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with suspected pulmonary embolism that passed informed consent were randomly divided in the two groups. In each group, demographic characteristics, qualitative indices, and enhancement rate of CTPA were recorded. Results: The diagnostic result obtained in majority of the participants in the two groups (88.5 % in Test bolus group vs. 73.1% in the Bolus tracking group). In the case of quantitative variables, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P > 0.05). The only statistically significant difference between the two groups is average of "X-ray dose". Conclusion: The results of our study show that there is no statistically significant difference between the Bolus Tracking and Test Bolus techniques for producing more homogeneous enhancement.http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=113;epage=113;aulast=MoradiBolus-trackingComputed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)pulmonary embolismtest bolus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maryam Moradi
Babak Khalili
spellingShingle Maryam Moradi
Babak Khalili
Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
Advanced Biomedical Research
Bolus-tracking
Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)
pulmonary embolism
test bolus
author_facet Maryam Moradi
Babak Khalili
author_sort Maryam Moradi
title Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
title_short Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
title_full Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
title_fullStr Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative indices and enhancement rate of CT pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: Comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
title_sort qualitative indices and enhancement rate of ct pulmonary angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: comparison between test bolus and bolus-tracking methods
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Advanced Biomedical Research
issn 2277-9175
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background: The aim of the present study was to assess the qualitative indices and enhancement rate of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism using Test bolus and Bolus-tracking techniques. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with suspected pulmonary embolism that passed informed consent were randomly divided in the two groups. In each group, demographic characteristics, qualitative indices, and enhancement rate of CTPA were recorded. Results: The diagnostic result obtained in majority of the participants in the two groups (88.5 % in Test bolus group vs. 73.1% in the Bolus tracking group). In the case of quantitative variables, no statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P > 0.05). The only statistically significant difference between the two groups is average of "X-ray dose". Conclusion: The results of our study show that there is no statistically significant difference between the Bolus Tracking and Test Bolus techniques for producing more homogeneous enhancement.
topic Bolus-tracking
Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)
pulmonary embolism
test bolus
url http://www.advbiores.net/article.asp?issn=2277-9175;year=2016;volume=5;issue=1;spage=113;epage=113;aulast=Moradi
work_keys_str_mv AT maryammoradi qualitativeindicesandenhancementrateofctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismcomparisonbetweentestbolusandbolustrackingmethods
AT babakkhalili qualitativeindicesandenhancementrateofctpulmonaryangiographyinpatientswithsuspectedpulmonaryembolismcomparisonbetweentestbolusandbolustrackingmethods
_version_ 1725750775614799872