Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment

Background: TURP syndrome is one of the complications in patients with post-TURP. The prevalence of this case in the fi rst PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital of Yogyakarta mortality rate was 4.7% of the 168 action TURP. This case requires preventive action by composing one tool for early detection of TURP s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sumarno Adi Subrata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta 2014-12-01
Series:IJNP (Indonesian Journal of Nursing Practices)
Online Access:https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ijnp/article/view/652
id doaj-328dbc3c735f472884f8c834973e2b24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-328dbc3c735f472884f8c834973e2b242021-02-02T14:34:35ZengUniversitas Muhammadiyah YogyakartaIJNP (Indonesian Journal of Nursing Practices)2548-42492548-592X2014-12-011211712710.18196/ijnp.v1i2.652557Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool AssessmentSumarno Adi Subrata0Universitas Muhammadiyah MagelangBackground: TURP syndrome is one of the complications in patients with post-TURP. The prevalence of this case in the fi rst PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital of Yogyakarta mortality rate was 4.7% of the 168 action TURP. This case requires preventive action by composing one tool for early detection of TURP syndrome. Objective: Develop a tool to detect the TURP syndrome. Methods: This mixed method research method. Qualitative action research method. Samples were seven nurses and one urologist. Research from April to June 2014 The instrument is FGD guide. Test the validity of using triangulation experts. Quantitative methods with validity and reliability. The sample was 21 nurses and conducted in July 2014 questionnaire Intrumennya are signs and symptoms of TURP syndrome. Test the validity of the Pearson product moment and reliability testing using Cronbach alpha. Two of these methods implemented in RS PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta I and II. Results: Qualitative methods produce 15 items signs and symptoms of TURP syndrome. Quantitative methods to test the validity of the fi fteen items that generate valid because the count is greater  r table (n = 21, 5% signifi cance value of 0.433). Reliability test results of 0.930, meaning that this tool reliable. This tool categorizes into three TURP syndrome is negative, mild, moderate, and heavy. Conclusion: It has been structured tool for early detection of TURP syndrome. Keywords: BPH, TURP Syndrome, Toolhttps://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ijnp/article/view/652
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sumarno Adi Subrata
spellingShingle Sumarno Adi Subrata
Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment
IJNP (Indonesian Journal of Nursing Practices)
author_facet Sumarno Adi Subrata
author_sort Sumarno Adi Subrata
title Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment
title_short Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment
title_full Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment
title_fullStr Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Penyusunan Turp Syndrome Tool Assessment
title_sort penyusunan turp syndrome tool assessment
publisher Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
series IJNP (Indonesian Journal of Nursing Practices)
issn 2548-4249
2548-592X
publishDate 2014-12-01
description Background: TURP syndrome is one of the complications in patients with post-TURP. The prevalence of this case in the fi rst PKU Muhammadiyah Hospital of Yogyakarta mortality rate was 4.7% of the 168 action TURP. This case requires preventive action by composing one tool for early detection of TURP syndrome. Objective: Develop a tool to detect the TURP syndrome. Methods: This mixed method research method. Qualitative action research method. Samples were seven nurses and one urologist. Research from April to June 2014 The instrument is FGD guide. Test the validity of using triangulation experts. Quantitative methods with validity and reliability. The sample was 21 nurses and conducted in July 2014 questionnaire Intrumennya are signs and symptoms of TURP syndrome. Test the validity of the Pearson product moment and reliability testing using Cronbach alpha. Two of these methods implemented in RS PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta I and II. Results: Qualitative methods produce 15 items signs and symptoms of TURP syndrome. Quantitative methods to test the validity of the fi fteen items that generate valid because the count is greater  r table (n = 21, 5% signifi cance value of 0.433). Reliability test results of 0.930, meaning that this tool reliable. This tool categorizes into three TURP syndrome is negative, mild, moderate, and heavy. Conclusion: It has been structured tool for early detection of TURP syndrome. Keywords: BPH, TURP Syndrome, Tool
url https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/ijnp/article/view/652
work_keys_str_mv AT sumarnoadisubrata penyusunanturpsyndrometoolassessment
_version_ 1724293887497863168