Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink

Channel aware and opportunistic scheduling algorithms exploit the channel knowledge and fading to increase the average throughput. Alternatively, each user could be served equally in order to maximize fairness. Obviously, there is a tradeoff between average throughput and fairness in the system. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2009-03-01
Series:EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/271540
id doaj-328d8f9165454dd19fdaa6eb61d8349d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-328d8f9165454dd19fdaa6eb61d8349d2020-11-25T00:20:36ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking1687-14721687-14992009-03-01200910.1155/2009/271540Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna DownlinkChannel aware and opportunistic scheduling algorithms exploit the channel knowledge and fading to increase the average throughput. Alternatively, each user could be served equally in order to maximize fairness. Obviously, there is a tradeoff between average throughput and fairness in the system. In this paper, we study four representative schedulers, namely the maximum throughput scheduler (MTS), the proportional fair scheduler (PFS), the (relative) opportunistic round robin scheduler (ORS), and the round robin scheduler (RRS) for a space-time coded multiple antenna downlink system. The system applies TDMA based scheduling and exploits the multiple antennas in terms of spatial diversity. We show that the average sum rate performance and the average worst-case delay depend strongly on the user distribution within the cell. MTS gains from asymmetrical distributed users whereas the other three schedulers suffer. On the other hand, the average fairness of MTS and PFS decreases with asymmetrical user distribution. The key contribution of this paper is to put these tradeoffs and observations on a solid theoretical basis. Both the PFS and the ORS provide a reasonable performance in terms of throughput and fairness. However, PFS outperforms ORS for symmetrical user distributions, whereas ORS outperforms PFS for asymmetrical user distribution. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/271540
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink
spellingShingle Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink
EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
title_short Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink
title_full Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink
title_fullStr Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink
title_full_unstemmed Throughput versus Fairness: Channel-Aware Scheduling in Multiple Antenna Downlink
title_sort throughput versus fairness: channel-aware scheduling in multiple antenna downlink
publisher SpringerOpen
series EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking
issn 1687-1472
1687-1499
publishDate 2009-03-01
description Channel aware and opportunistic scheduling algorithms exploit the channel knowledge and fading to increase the average throughput. Alternatively, each user could be served equally in order to maximize fairness. Obviously, there is a tradeoff between average throughput and fairness in the system. In this paper, we study four representative schedulers, namely the maximum throughput scheduler (MTS), the proportional fair scheduler (PFS), the (relative) opportunistic round robin scheduler (ORS), and the round robin scheduler (RRS) for a space-time coded multiple antenna downlink system. The system applies TDMA based scheduling and exploits the multiple antennas in terms of spatial diversity. We show that the average sum rate performance and the average worst-case delay depend strongly on the user distribution within the cell. MTS gains from asymmetrical distributed users whereas the other three schedulers suffer. On the other hand, the average fairness of MTS and PFS decreases with asymmetrical user distribution. The key contribution of this paper is to put these tradeoffs and observations on a solid theoretical basis. Both the PFS and the ORS provide a reasonable performance in terms of throughput and fairness. However, PFS outperforms ORS for symmetrical user distributions, whereas ORS outperforms PFS for asymmetrical user distribution.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/271540
_version_ 1725366368747913216