In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt

A series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Zhang, David Du, Xiaohong Bai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914
id doaj-327f2f20d8f949c08f0492b81716d442
record_format Article
spelling doaj-327f2f20d8f949c08f0492b81716d4422020-11-24T21:56:00ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84341687-84422018-01-01201810.1155/2018/35639143563914In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft SiltWei Zhang0David Du1Xiaohong Bai2Department of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, ChinaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, ChinaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, ChinaA series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of the first geobelt layer beneath the footing, the vertical spacing between two geobelt layers, the linear density of reinforcement, and the material type of geobelt. The pressure distribution on bottom of the cushion was measured. The test results showed that the bearing capacity of reinforced gravel cushion was significantly larger than that of unreinforced gravel cushion, and the stress diffusion effect of reinforced gravel cushion was also more pronounced than that of the unreinforced cushion. The pressure distribution on bottom of reinforced gravel cushion was in a saddle shape. According to calculation and analysis, the stress diffusion angles of reinforced cushions were all larger than 20°.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei Zhang
David Du
Xiaohong Bai
spellingShingle Wei Zhang
David Du
Xiaohong Bai
In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
author_facet Wei Zhang
David Du
Xiaohong Bai
author_sort Wei Zhang
title In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
title_short In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
title_full In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
title_fullStr In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
title_full_unstemmed In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
title_sort in situ testing of square footing resting on geobelt-reinforced gravel thin cushion on soft silt
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Materials Science and Engineering
issn 1687-8434
1687-8442
publishDate 2018-01-01
description A series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of the first geobelt layer beneath the footing, the vertical spacing between two geobelt layers, the linear density of reinforcement, and the material type of geobelt. The pressure distribution on bottom of the cushion was measured. The test results showed that the bearing capacity of reinforced gravel cushion was significantly larger than that of unreinforced gravel cushion, and the stress diffusion effect of reinforced gravel cushion was also more pronounced than that of the unreinforced cushion. The pressure distribution on bottom of reinforced gravel cushion was in a saddle shape. According to calculation and analysis, the stress diffusion angles of reinforced cushions were all larger than 20°.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914
work_keys_str_mv AT weizhang insitutestingofsquarefootingrestingongeobeltreinforcedgravelthincushiononsoftsilt
AT daviddu insitutestingofsquarefootingrestingongeobeltreinforcedgravelthincushiononsoftsilt
AT xiaohongbai insitutestingofsquarefootingrestingongeobeltreinforcedgravelthincushiononsoftsilt
_version_ 1725860132037853184