In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt
A series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914 |
id |
doaj-327f2f20d8f949c08f0492b81716d442 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-327f2f20d8f949c08f0492b81716d4422020-11-24T21:56:00ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Materials Science and Engineering1687-84341687-84422018-01-01201810.1155/2018/35639143563914In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft SiltWei Zhang0David Du1Xiaohong Bai2Department of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, ChinaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, ChinaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, ChinaA series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of the first geobelt layer beneath the footing, the vertical spacing between two geobelt layers, the linear density of reinforcement, and the material type of geobelt. The pressure distribution on bottom of the cushion was measured. The test results showed that the bearing capacity of reinforced gravel cushion was significantly larger than that of unreinforced gravel cushion, and the stress diffusion effect of reinforced gravel cushion was also more pronounced than that of the unreinforced cushion. The pressure distribution on bottom of reinforced gravel cushion was in a saddle shape. According to calculation and analysis, the stress diffusion angles of reinforced cushions were all larger than 20°.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wei Zhang David Du Xiaohong Bai |
spellingShingle |
Wei Zhang David Du Xiaohong Bai In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
author_facet |
Wei Zhang David Du Xiaohong Bai |
author_sort |
Wei Zhang |
title |
In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt |
title_short |
In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt |
title_full |
In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt |
title_fullStr |
In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Situ Testing of Square Footing Resting on Geobelt-Reinforced Gravel Thin Cushion on Soft Silt |
title_sort |
in situ testing of square footing resting on geobelt-reinforced gravel thin cushion on soft silt |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Advances in Materials Science and Engineering |
issn |
1687-8434 1687-8442 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
A series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of the first geobelt layer beneath the footing, the vertical spacing between two geobelt layers, the linear density of reinforcement, and the material type of geobelt. The pressure distribution on bottom of the cushion was measured. The test results showed that the bearing capacity of reinforced gravel cushion was significantly larger than that of unreinforced gravel cushion, and the stress diffusion effect of reinforced gravel cushion was also more pronounced than that of the unreinforced cushion. The pressure distribution on bottom of reinforced gravel cushion was in a saddle shape. According to calculation and analysis, the stress diffusion angles of reinforced cushions were all larger than 20°. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3563914 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT weizhang insitutestingofsquarefootingrestingongeobeltreinforcedgravelthincushiononsoftsilt AT daviddu insitutestingofsquarefootingrestingongeobeltreinforcedgravelthincushiononsoftsilt AT xiaohongbai insitutestingofsquarefootingrestingongeobeltreinforcedgravelthincushiononsoftsilt |
_version_ |
1725860132037853184 |