Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
This study evaluates the efficacy of a Pulsed Biphasic Waveform (PBW) for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF). Large database (2001-2006), collected with automated external defibrillators (AED), (FRED®, Schiller Medical SAS, France), is proce...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Academic Publishing House
2008-10-01
|
Series: | Bioautomation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.clbme.bas.bg/bioautomation/2008/vol_10.1/files/10_3.1.pdf |
id |
doaj-327d04b129b44044957bc3a53fd7b12a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-327d04b129b44044957bc3a53fd7b12a2020-11-25T02:50:27ZengAcademic Publishing HouseBioautomation1313-261X1312-451X2008-10-011015970Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac ArrestJean-Philippe DidonVessela KrastevaGuy FontaineIrena JekovaManuel ContiniJohann-Jakob SchmidThis study evaluates the efficacy of a Pulsed Biphasic Waveform (PBW) for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF). Large database (2001-2006), collected with automated external defibrillators (AED), (FRED®, Schiller Medical SAS, France), is processed.In Study1 we compared the defibrillation efficacy of two energy stacks (90-130-180 J) vs. (130-130-180 J) in 248 OHCA VF patients. The analysis of the first shock PBW efficacy proves that energies as low as 90 J are able to terminate VF in a large proportion of OHCA patients (77% at 5 s and 69% at 30 s). Although the results show a trend towards the benefit of higher energy PBW with 130 J (86% at 5 s, 73% at 30 s), the difference in shock efficacy does not reach statistical significance. Both PBW energy stacks (90-130-180 J) and (130-130-180 J) achieve equal success rates of defibrillation. Analysis of the post-shock rhythm after the first shock is also provided.For Study2 of 21 patients with PBW shocks (130-130-180 J), we assessed some attending OHCA circumstances: call-to-shock delay (median 16min, range 11-41 min), phone advices of CPR (67%). About 50% of the patients were admitted alive to hospital, and 19% were discharged from hospital. After the first shock, patients admitted to hospital are more often presenting organized rhythm (OR) (27% to 55%) than patients not admitted (0% to 10%), with significant difference at 15 s and 30 s. Post-shock VFs appear significantly rare until 15s for patients admitted to hospital (0% to 9%) than for patients not admitted to hospital (40% to 50%). Return of OR (ROOR) and efficacy to defibrillate VF at 5 s and 15 s with first shock are important markers to predict patient admission to hospital. http://www.clbme.bas.bg/bioautomation/2008/vol_10.1/files/10_3.1.pdf Automated external defibrillatorPulsed biphasic waveformLow energy defibrillationOutcome from defibrillation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean-Philippe Didon Vessela Krasteva Guy Fontaine Irena Jekova Manuel Contini Johann-Jakob Schmid |
spellingShingle |
Jean-Philippe Didon Vessela Krasteva Guy Fontaine Irena Jekova Manuel Contini Johann-Jakob Schmid Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Bioautomation Automated external defibrillator Pulsed biphasic waveform Low energy defibrillation Outcome from defibrillation |
author_facet |
Jean-Philippe Didon Vessela Krasteva Guy Fontaine Irena Jekova Manuel Contini Johann-Jakob Schmid |
author_sort |
Jean-Philippe Didon |
title |
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_short |
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_full |
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest |
title_sort |
assessment of the efficacy of pulsed biphasic defibrillation shocks for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest |
publisher |
Academic Publishing House |
series |
Bioautomation |
issn |
1313-261X 1312-451X |
publishDate |
2008-10-01 |
description |
This study evaluates the efficacy of a Pulsed Biphasic Waveform (PBW) for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in ventricular fibrillation (VF). Large database (2001-2006), collected with automated external defibrillators (AED), (FRED®, Schiller Medical SAS, France), is processed.In Study1 we compared the defibrillation efficacy of two energy stacks (90-130-180 J) vs. (130-130-180 J) in 248 OHCA VF patients. The analysis of the first shock PBW efficacy proves that energies as low as 90 J are able to terminate VF in a large proportion of OHCA patients (77% at 5 s and 69% at 30 s). Although the results show a trend towards the benefit of higher energy PBW with 130 J (86% at 5 s, 73% at 30 s), the difference in shock efficacy does not reach statistical significance. Both PBW energy stacks (90-130-180 J) and (130-130-180 J) achieve equal success rates of defibrillation. Analysis of the post-shock rhythm after the first shock is also provided.For Study2 of 21 patients with PBW shocks (130-130-180 J), we assessed some attending OHCA circumstances: call-to-shock delay (median 16min, range 11-41 min), phone advices of CPR (67%). About 50% of the patients were admitted alive to hospital, and 19% were discharged from hospital. After the first shock, patients admitted to hospital are more often presenting organized rhythm (OR) (27% to 55%) than patients not admitted (0% to 10%), with significant difference at 15 s and 30 s. Post-shock VFs appear significantly rare until 15s for patients admitted to hospital (0% to 9%) than for patients not admitted to hospital (40% to 50%). Return of OR (ROOR) and efficacy to defibrillate VF at 5 s and 15 s with first shock are important markers to predict patient admission to hospital. |
topic |
Automated external defibrillator Pulsed biphasic waveform Low energy defibrillation Outcome from defibrillation |
url |
http://www.clbme.bas.bg/bioautomation/2008/vol_10.1/files/10_3.1.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeanphilippedidon assessmentoftheefficacyofpulsedbiphasicdefibrillationshocksfortreatmentofoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT vesselakrasteva assessmentoftheefficacyofpulsedbiphasicdefibrillationshocksfortreatmentofoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT guyfontaine assessmentoftheefficacyofpulsedbiphasicdefibrillationshocksfortreatmentofoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT irenajekova assessmentoftheefficacyofpulsedbiphasicdefibrillationshocksfortreatmentofoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT manuelcontini assessmentoftheefficacyofpulsedbiphasicdefibrillationshocksfortreatmentofoutofhospitalcardiacarrest AT johannjakobschmid assessmentoftheefficacyofpulsedbiphasicdefibrillationshocksfortreatmentofoutofhospitalcardiacarrest |
_version_ |
1724738464912506880 |