Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care

Objectives:. To determine how several existing crisis standards of care triage protocols would have distinguished between patients with coronavirus disease 2019 requiring intensive care. Design:. Retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Single urban academic medical center. Patients:. One-hundred twent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily B. Rubin, MD, JD, MS, Rachel S. Knipe, MD, Rebecca A. Israel, MD, Thomas H. McCoy, Jr, MD, Andrew M. Courtwright, MD PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2021-04-01
Series:Critical Care Explorations
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000412
id doaj-3263004092a746f4a0f1839b85009bee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3263004092a746f4a0f1839b85009bee2021-05-25T02:07:31ZengWolters KluwerCritical Care Explorations2639-80282021-04-0134e041210.1097/CCE.0000000000000412202104000-00014Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive CareEmily B. Rubin, MD, JD, MS0Rachel S. Knipe, MD1Rebecca A. Israel, MD2Thomas H. McCoy, Jr, MD3Andrew M. Courtwright, MD PhD41 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.2 Center for Quantitative Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.3 Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care, Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Objectives:. To determine how several existing crisis standards of care triage protocols would have distinguished between patients with coronavirus disease 2019 requiring intensive care. Design:. Retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Single urban academic medical center. Patients:. One-hundred twenty patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who required intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Interventions:. None. Measurements and Main Results:. The characteristics of each patient at the time of ICU triage were used to determine how patients would have been prioritized using four crisis standards of care protocols. The vast majority of patients in the cohort would have been in the highest priority group using a triage protocol focusing on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment alone. Prioritization based on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and 1-year life expectancy would have resulted in only slightly more differentiation between patients. Prioritization based on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and 5-year life expectancy would have added significant additional differentiation depending on how priority groups were defined. Conclusions:. There is considerable controversy regarding the use of criteria other than prognosis for short-term survival in initial allocation of critical care resources under crisis standards of care triage protocols. To the extent that initial triage protocols would not create sufficient differentiation between patients, effectively resulting in a first-come, first-served initial allocation of resources, it is important to focus on how resources would be reallocated in the event of ongoing scarcity.http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000412
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emily B. Rubin, MD, JD, MS
Rachel S. Knipe, MD
Rebecca A. Israel, MD
Thomas H. McCoy, Jr, MD
Andrew M. Courtwright, MD PhD
spellingShingle Emily B. Rubin, MD, JD, MS
Rachel S. Knipe, MD
Rebecca A. Israel, MD
Thomas H. McCoy, Jr, MD
Andrew M. Courtwright, MD PhD
Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care
Critical Care Explorations
author_facet Emily B. Rubin, MD, JD, MS
Rachel S. Knipe, MD
Rebecca A. Israel, MD
Thomas H. McCoy, Jr, MD
Andrew M. Courtwright, MD PhD
author_sort Emily B. Rubin, MD, JD, MS
title Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care
title_short Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care
title_full Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care
title_fullStr Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care
title_full_unstemmed Existing Crisis Standards of Care Triage Protocols May Not Significantly Differentiate Between Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Who Require Intensive Care
title_sort existing crisis standards of care triage protocols may not significantly differentiate between patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who require intensive care
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Critical Care Explorations
issn 2639-8028
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Objectives:. To determine how several existing crisis standards of care triage protocols would have distinguished between patients with coronavirus disease 2019 requiring intensive care. Design:. Retrospective cohort study. Setting:. Single urban academic medical center. Patients:. One-hundred twenty patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who required intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Interventions:. None. Measurements and Main Results:. The characteristics of each patient at the time of ICU triage were used to determine how patients would have been prioritized using four crisis standards of care protocols. The vast majority of patients in the cohort would have been in the highest priority group using a triage protocol focusing on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment alone. Prioritization based on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and 1-year life expectancy would have resulted in only slightly more differentiation between patients. Prioritization based on Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and 5-year life expectancy would have added significant additional differentiation depending on how priority groups were defined. Conclusions:. There is considerable controversy regarding the use of criteria other than prognosis for short-term survival in initial allocation of critical care resources under crisis standards of care triage protocols. To the extent that initial triage protocols would not create sufficient differentiation between patients, effectively resulting in a first-come, first-served initial allocation of resources, it is important to focus on how resources would be reallocated in the event of ongoing scarcity.
url http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000412
work_keys_str_mv AT emilybrubinmdjdms existingcrisisstandardsofcaretriageprotocolsmaynotsignificantlydifferentiatebetweenpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019whorequireintensivecare
AT rachelsknipemd existingcrisisstandardsofcaretriageprotocolsmaynotsignificantlydifferentiatebetweenpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019whorequireintensivecare
AT rebeccaaisraelmd existingcrisisstandardsofcaretriageprotocolsmaynotsignificantlydifferentiatebetweenpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019whorequireintensivecare
AT thomashmccoyjrmd existingcrisisstandardsofcaretriageprotocolsmaynotsignificantlydifferentiatebetweenpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019whorequireintensivecare
AT andrewmcourtwrightmdphd existingcrisisstandardsofcaretriageprotocolsmaynotsignificantlydifferentiatebetweenpatientswithcoronavirusdisease2019whorequireintensivecare
_version_ 1721428081177001984