HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW

This paper sets out to tackle the issue of the criteria which should be met prior to submission of papers to indexed scientific journals. Firstly, the author addresses the field of qualitative research and tries to define the general characteristics of such works, and secondly, some clarification is...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nenad Suzić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Preschool Teacher Training College "Mihailo Palov" 2017-06-01
Series:Istraživanja u Pedagogiji
Subjects:
Online Access:http://research.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2217-7337_v07_n01_p134.pdf
id doaj-3260cef7c73a4f09883588e0dcc1ee8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3260cef7c73a4f09883588e0dcc1ee8b2020-11-25T02:45:31ZengPreschool Teacher Training College "Mihailo Palov"Istraživanja u Pedagogiji2217-73372406-20062017-06-017113414410.17810/2015.55HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEWNenad Suzić0Faculty of Philosophy Banja LukaThis paper sets out to tackle the issue of the criteria which should be met prior to submission of papers to indexed scientific journals. Firstly, the author addresses the field of qualitative research and tries to define the general characteristics of such works, and secondly, some clarification is brought with respect to the imbalance between the number of published articles in favor of quantitative research. Many authors from our region restate observations and cite other authors, and use the term qualitative study for such articles. This paper is also concerned with an overwhelming number of misconceptions which can be found in the articles made by the authors from the Balkans. These misconceptions include: (1) confirmation or rejection of hypotheses by correlations, (2) perform an analysis on item-by-item basis, (3) application of parametric statistics on non-parametric set of data; and so forth. Each of the mentioned misconceptions is explained in this paper, but it has not been attempted to prove them as this had been done before in numerous up-to-date textbooks. This paper also deals with action research,with respect to their relatively insignificant presence in highly ranked scientific journals, sincethey combine characteristics of qualitative and quantitative works. Some authors often fall into the trap of putting every action change in the focus of action research. Reproducibility of study is one of the most fundamental scientific prerequisites, and it has to be met by any study – qualitative, quantitative and action research alike. http://research.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2217-7337_v07_n01_p134.pdfqualitative researchquantitative researchaction researchreproducibilitymisconceptions
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nenad Suzić
spellingShingle Nenad Suzić
HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW
Istraživanja u Pedagogiji
qualitative research
quantitative research
action research
reproducibility
misconceptions
author_facet Nenad Suzić
author_sort Nenad Suzić
title HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW
title_short HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW
title_full HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW
title_fullStr HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW
title_full_unstemmed HOW TO PUBLISH WORK IN INDEXED SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS – AN OVERVIEW
title_sort how to publish work in indexed scientific journals – an overview
publisher Preschool Teacher Training College "Mihailo Palov"
series Istraživanja u Pedagogiji
issn 2217-7337
2406-2006
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This paper sets out to tackle the issue of the criteria which should be met prior to submission of papers to indexed scientific journals. Firstly, the author addresses the field of qualitative research and tries to define the general characteristics of such works, and secondly, some clarification is brought with respect to the imbalance between the number of published articles in favor of quantitative research. Many authors from our region restate observations and cite other authors, and use the term qualitative study for such articles. This paper is also concerned with an overwhelming number of misconceptions which can be found in the articles made by the authors from the Balkans. These misconceptions include: (1) confirmation or rejection of hypotheses by correlations, (2) perform an analysis on item-by-item basis, (3) application of parametric statistics on non-parametric set of data; and so forth. Each of the mentioned misconceptions is explained in this paper, but it has not been attempted to prove them as this had been done before in numerous up-to-date textbooks. This paper also deals with action research,with respect to their relatively insignificant presence in highly ranked scientific journals, sincethey combine characteristics of qualitative and quantitative works. Some authors often fall into the trap of putting every action change in the focus of action research. Reproducibility of study is one of the most fundamental scientific prerequisites, and it has to be met by any study – qualitative, quantitative and action research alike.
topic qualitative research
quantitative research
action research
reproducibility
misconceptions
url http://research.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2217-7337_v07_n01_p134.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nenadsuzic howtopublishworkinindexedscientificjournalsanoverview
_version_ 1724762256328097792