A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
We present two probabilistic models to estimate the risk of introducing infectious diseases into previously unaffected countries/regions by infective travellers. We analyse two distinct situations, one dealing with a directly transmitted infection (measles in Italy in 2017) and one dealing with a ve...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6289681 |
id |
doaj-325257a4c35047a787ddd6223f427c54 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-325257a4c35047a787ddd6223f427c542020-11-25T02:21:21ZengHindawi LimitedComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine1748-670X1748-67182018-01-01201810.1155/2018/62896816289681A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected RegionsMarcos Amaku0Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho1Margaret Armstrong2Eduardo Massad3School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilSchool of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilSchool of Applied Mathematics, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilSchool of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilWe present two probabilistic models to estimate the risk of introducing infectious diseases into previously unaffected countries/regions by infective travellers. We analyse two distinct situations, one dealing with a directly transmitted infection (measles in Italy in 2017) and one dealing with a vector-borne infection (Zika virus in Rio de Janeiro, which may happen in the future). To calculate the risk in the first scenario, we used a simple, nonhomogeneous birth process. The second model proposed in this paper provides a way to calculate the probability that local mosquitoes become infected by the arrival of a single infective traveller during his/her infectiousness period. The result of the risk of measles invasion of Italy was of 93% and the result of the risk of Zika virus invasion of Rio de Janeiro was of 22%.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6289681 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marcos Amaku Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho Margaret Armstrong Eduardo Massad |
spellingShingle |
Marcos Amaku Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho Margaret Armstrong Eduardo Massad A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine |
author_facet |
Marcos Amaku Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho Margaret Armstrong Eduardo Massad |
author_sort |
Marcos Amaku |
title |
A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions |
title_short |
A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions |
title_full |
A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions |
title_fullStr |
A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions |
title_sort |
note on the risk of infections invading unaffected regions |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine |
issn |
1748-670X 1748-6718 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
We present two probabilistic models to estimate the risk of introducing infectious diseases into previously unaffected countries/regions by infective travellers. We analyse two distinct situations, one dealing with a directly transmitted infection (measles in Italy in 2017) and one dealing with a vector-borne infection (Zika virus in Rio de Janeiro, which may happen in the future). To calculate the risk in the first scenario, we used a simple, nonhomogeneous birth process. The second model proposed in this paper provides a way to calculate the probability that local mosquitoes become infected by the arrival of a single infective traveller during his/her infectiousness period. The result of the risk of measles invasion of Italy was of 93% and the result of the risk of Zika virus invasion of Rio de Janeiro was of 22%. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6289681 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marcosamaku anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT franciscoantoniobezerracoutinho anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT margaretarmstrong anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT eduardomassad anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT marcosamaku noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT franciscoantoniobezerracoutinho noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT margaretarmstrong noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions AT eduardomassad noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions |
_version_ |
1724866854465306624 |