A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions

We present two probabilistic models to estimate the risk of introducing infectious diseases into previously unaffected countries/regions by infective travellers. We analyse two distinct situations, one dealing with a directly transmitted infection (measles in Italy in 2017) and one dealing with a ve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcos Amaku, Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho, Margaret Armstrong, Eduardo Massad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6289681
id doaj-325257a4c35047a787ddd6223f427c54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-325257a4c35047a787ddd6223f427c542020-11-25T02:21:21ZengHindawi LimitedComputational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine1748-670X1748-67182018-01-01201810.1155/2018/62896816289681A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected RegionsMarcos Amaku0Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho1Margaret Armstrong2Eduardo Massad3School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilSchool of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilSchool of Applied Mathematics, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilSchool of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilWe present two probabilistic models to estimate the risk of introducing infectious diseases into previously unaffected countries/regions by infective travellers. We analyse two distinct situations, one dealing with a directly transmitted infection (measles in Italy in 2017) and one dealing with a vector-borne infection (Zika virus in Rio de Janeiro, which may happen in the future). To calculate the risk in the first scenario, we used a simple, nonhomogeneous birth process. The second model proposed in this paper provides a way to calculate the probability that local mosquitoes become infected by the arrival of a single infective traveller during his/her infectiousness period. The result of the risk of measles invasion of Italy was of 93% and the result of the risk of Zika virus invasion of Rio de Janeiro was of 22%.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6289681
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marcos Amaku
Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho
Margaret Armstrong
Eduardo Massad
spellingShingle Marcos Amaku
Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho
Margaret Armstrong
Eduardo Massad
A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
author_facet Marcos Amaku
Francisco Antonio Bezerra Coutinho
Margaret Armstrong
Eduardo Massad
author_sort Marcos Amaku
title A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
title_short A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
title_full A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
title_fullStr A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
title_full_unstemmed A Note on the Risk of Infections Invading Unaffected Regions
title_sort note on the risk of infections invading unaffected regions
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
issn 1748-670X
1748-6718
publishDate 2018-01-01
description We present two probabilistic models to estimate the risk of introducing infectious diseases into previously unaffected countries/regions by infective travellers. We analyse two distinct situations, one dealing with a directly transmitted infection (measles in Italy in 2017) and one dealing with a vector-borne infection (Zika virus in Rio de Janeiro, which may happen in the future). To calculate the risk in the first scenario, we used a simple, nonhomogeneous birth process. The second model proposed in this paper provides a way to calculate the probability that local mosquitoes become infected by the arrival of a single infective traveller during his/her infectiousness period. The result of the risk of measles invasion of Italy was of 93% and the result of the risk of Zika virus invasion of Rio de Janeiro was of 22%.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/6289681
work_keys_str_mv AT marcosamaku anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT franciscoantoniobezerracoutinho anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT margaretarmstrong anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT eduardomassad anoteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT marcosamaku noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT franciscoantoniobezerracoutinho noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT margaretarmstrong noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
AT eduardomassad noteontheriskofinfectionsinvadingunaffectedregions
_version_ 1724866854465306624