Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model

Relational categories are structure-based categories, defined not only by their internal properties but also by their extrinsic relations with other categories. For example, predator could not be defined without referring to hunt and prey. Even though they are commonly used, there are few models tak...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgi Petkov, Yolina Petrova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00563/full
id doaj-32459f43170e4a0ab114c07f6d199e87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-32459f43170e4a0ab114c07f6d199e872020-11-24T23:31:33ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-03-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00563381691Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap ModelGeorgi Petkov0Georgi Petkov1Yolina Petrova2Yolina Petrova3Department of Cognitive Science and Psychology, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, BulgariaCentral and East European Center for Cognitive Science, Sofia, BulgariaDepartment of Cognitive Science and Psychology, New Bulgarian University, Sofia, BulgariaCentral and East European Center for Cognitive Science, Sofia, BulgariaRelational categories are structure-based categories, defined not only by their internal properties but also by their extrinsic relations with other categories. For example, predator could not be defined without referring to hunt and prey. Even though they are commonly used, there are few models taking into account any relational information. A category learning and categorization model aiming to fill this gap is presented. Previous research addresses the hypothesis that the acquisition and the use of relational categories are underlined by structural alignment. That is why the proposed RoleMap model is based on mechanisms often studied as the analogy-making sub-processes, developed on a suitable for this cognitive architecture. RoleMap is conceived in such a way that relation-based category learning and categorization emerge while other tasks are performed. The assumption it steps on is that people constantly make structural alignments between what they experience and what they know. During these alignments various mappings and anticipations emerge. The mappings capture commonalities between the target (the representation of the current situation) and the memory, while the anticipations try to fill the missing information in the target, based on the conceptual system. Because some of the mappings are highly important, they are transformed into a distributed representation of a new concept for further use, which denotes the category learning. When some knowledge is missing in the target, meaning it is uncategorized, that knowledge is transferred from memory in the form of anticipations. The wining anticipation is transformed into a category member, denoting the act of categorization. The model’s behavior emerges from the competition between these two pressures – to categorize and to create new categories. Several groups of simulations demonstrate that the model can deal with relational categories in a context-dependent manner and to account for single-shot learning, challenging most of the existing approaches to category learning. The model also simulates previous empirical data pointing to the thematic categories and to the puzzling inverse base-rate effect. Finally, the model’s strengths and limitations are evaluated.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00563/fullcategorizationcategory acquisitioncognitive modelinganalogy-makingcontext dependencerelation-based categories
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Georgi Petkov
Georgi Petkov
Yolina Petrova
Yolina Petrova
spellingShingle Georgi Petkov
Georgi Petkov
Yolina Petrova
Yolina Petrova
Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model
Frontiers in Psychology
categorization
category acquisition
cognitive modeling
analogy-making
context dependence
relation-based categories
author_facet Georgi Petkov
Georgi Petkov
Yolina Petrova
Yolina Petrova
author_sort Georgi Petkov
title Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model
title_short Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model
title_full Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model
title_fullStr Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model
title_full_unstemmed Relation-Based Categorization and Category Learning as a Result From Structural Alignment. The RoleMap Model
title_sort relation-based categorization and category learning as a result from structural alignment. the rolemap model
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Relational categories are structure-based categories, defined not only by their internal properties but also by their extrinsic relations with other categories. For example, predator could not be defined without referring to hunt and prey. Even though they are commonly used, there are few models taking into account any relational information. A category learning and categorization model aiming to fill this gap is presented. Previous research addresses the hypothesis that the acquisition and the use of relational categories are underlined by structural alignment. That is why the proposed RoleMap model is based on mechanisms often studied as the analogy-making sub-processes, developed on a suitable for this cognitive architecture. RoleMap is conceived in such a way that relation-based category learning and categorization emerge while other tasks are performed. The assumption it steps on is that people constantly make structural alignments between what they experience and what they know. During these alignments various mappings and anticipations emerge. The mappings capture commonalities between the target (the representation of the current situation) and the memory, while the anticipations try to fill the missing information in the target, based on the conceptual system. Because some of the mappings are highly important, they are transformed into a distributed representation of a new concept for further use, which denotes the category learning. When some knowledge is missing in the target, meaning it is uncategorized, that knowledge is transferred from memory in the form of anticipations. The wining anticipation is transformed into a category member, denoting the act of categorization. The model’s behavior emerges from the competition between these two pressures – to categorize and to create new categories. Several groups of simulations demonstrate that the model can deal with relational categories in a context-dependent manner and to account for single-shot learning, challenging most of the existing approaches to category learning. The model also simulates previous empirical data pointing to the thematic categories and to the puzzling inverse base-rate effect. Finally, the model’s strengths and limitations are evaluated.
topic categorization
category acquisition
cognitive modeling
analogy-making
context dependence
relation-based categories
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00563/full
work_keys_str_mv AT georgipetkov relationbasedcategorizationandcategorylearningasaresultfromstructuralalignmenttherolemapmodel
AT georgipetkov relationbasedcategorizationandcategorylearningasaresultfromstructuralalignmenttherolemapmodel
AT yolinapetrova relationbasedcategorizationandcategorylearningasaresultfromstructuralalignmenttherolemapmodel
AT yolinapetrova relationbasedcategorizationandcategorylearningasaresultfromstructuralalignmenttherolemapmodel
_version_ 1725537468821798912