Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia

<p>The death of Perdiccas, son of Orontes, during his invasion of Egypt is a fact hardly understandable, so that we can find different explanations for this event. The main goal of this paper is to establish a connection between Perdiccas’ death and the importance, meaning of rivers and its cr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ignacio Molina
Format: Article
Language:ell
Published: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Ciències de l’Antiguitat i l’Edat Mitjana. 2018-11-01
Series:Karanos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistes.uab.cat/karanos/article/view/6
id doaj-322aad883054477c8d41fe5a1ec1731d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-322aad883054477c8d41fe5a1ec1731d2021-05-04T15:44:09ZellUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Ciències de l’Antiguitat i l’Edat Mitjana.Karanos2604-61992604-35212018-11-0110871062Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient MacedoniaIgnacio Molina0Universidad de Alcalá<p>The death of Perdiccas, son of Orontes, during his invasion of Egypt is a fact hardly understandable, so that we can find different explanations for this event. The main goal of this paper is to establish a connection between Perdiccas’ death and the importance, meaning of rivers and its crossing for the ancient Macedonians. Indeed, rivers were related to kingship. This fact is reflected in its relationship with kings of the Balkan geographical area (Polyaen. 4.12.3). Thus, we can find passages in which some of most important mythical characters were begotten by a god-river (Asteropaios, Rhesus, Orpheus, etc). Besides, sometimes even the majesty comes from the river, because the kings were crowned into the river or near one (App. <em>Syr</em>. 56; Justin 15. 4.2-7). In fact, the founder of the Argead royal house, Perdiccas I, became king after being saved by a river (Hdt. 8. 138). The strong connection between kings and rivers can be perceived during the crossing, because the Macedonian monarchs, especially Alexander the Great, were responsible of this act. In other words, a true king was able to protect his soldiers during the crossing, given his close link with the water. Perdiccas son of Orontes wanted to become king, therefore the disaster of Nile could be understood like ordeal which showed the will of the river. Perdiccas was not considered a true king, while Ptolemy should become one.</p>https://revistes.uab.cat/karanos/article/view/6perdiccasnilealexander the greatdiadochoiancient macedonian mythsancient religionorpheus
collection DOAJ
language ell
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ignacio Molina
spellingShingle Ignacio Molina
Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia
Karanos
perdiccas
nile
alexander the great
diadochoi
ancient macedonian myths
ancient religion
orpheus
author_facet Ignacio Molina
author_sort Ignacio Molina
title Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia
title_short Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia
title_full Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia
title_fullStr Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia
title_full_unstemmed Death on the Nile . The murder of Perdiccas and the river crossing in Ancient Macedonia
title_sort death on the nile . the murder of perdiccas and the river crossing in ancient macedonia
publisher Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Departament de Ciències de l’Antiguitat i l’Edat Mitjana.
series Karanos
issn 2604-6199
2604-3521
publishDate 2018-11-01
description <p>The death of Perdiccas, son of Orontes, during his invasion of Egypt is a fact hardly understandable, so that we can find different explanations for this event. The main goal of this paper is to establish a connection between Perdiccas’ death and the importance, meaning of rivers and its crossing for the ancient Macedonians. Indeed, rivers were related to kingship. This fact is reflected in its relationship with kings of the Balkan geographical area (Polyaen. 4.12.3). Thus, we can find passages in which some of most important mythical characters were begotten by a god-river (Asteropaios, Rhesus, Orpheus, etc). Besides, sometimes even the majesty comes from the river, because the kings were crowned into the river or near one (App. <em>Syr</em>. 56; Justin 15. 4.2-7). In fact, the founder of the Argead royal house, Perdiccas I, became king after being saved by a river (Hdt. 8. 138). The strong connection between kings and rivers can be perceived during the crossing, because the Macedonian monarchs, especially Alexander the Great, were responsible of this act. In other words, a true king was able to protect his soldiers during the crossing, given his close link with the water. Perdiccas son of Orontes wanted to become king, therefore the disaster of Nile could be understood like ordeal which showed the will of the river. Perdiccas was not considered a true king, while Ptolemy should become one.</p>
topic perdiccas
nile
alexander the great
diadochoi
ancient macedonian myths
ancient religion
orpheus
url https://revistes.uab.cat/karanos/article/view/6
work_keys_str_mv AT ignaciomolina deathonthenilethemurderofperdiccasandtherivercrossinginancientmacedonia
_version_ 1721478577233330176