Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Anesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil can be maintained with either fixed or titrated desflurane concentration. We hypothesized that the fixed-gas concentration (FG) method would reduce the number of anesthetic titrations without hypnotic and hemodynamic instability compared to the bispectral...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seong Mi Yang, Yoo Sun Jung, Chul-Woo Jung, Won Ho Kim, Soo Bin Yoon, Hyung-Chul Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241828
id doaj-321e9419550d4ceaa7fe1bd44a06b612
record_format Article
spelling doaj-321e9419550d4ceaa7fe1bd44a06b6122021-03-04T12:29:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011511e024182810.1371/journal.pone.0241828Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.Seong Mi YangYoo Sun JungChul-Woo JungWon Ho KimSoo Bin YoonHyung-Chul LeeAnesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil can be maintained with either fixed or titrated desflurane concentration. We hypothesized that the fixed-gas concentration (FG) method would reduce the number of anesthetic titrations without hypnotic and hemodynamic instability compared to the bispectral index (BIS)-guided (BG) method. Forty-eight patients were randomly allocated to the FG or BG groups. In the FG group, desflurane vaporizer setting was fixed at 1 age-corrected minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). In the BG group, desflurane was titrated to target a BIS level at 50. Remifentanil was titrated to maintain a systolic arterial pressure (SAP) of 120 mmHg in both groups. Our primary endpoint was the hypnotic stability measured by the wobble of BIS in performance analysis, and the secondary endpoints included the wobble of SAP, mean BIS value during surgery, and the number of anesthetic titrations. The BIS in the FG group showed significantly less wobble (3.9 ± 1.1% vs 5.5 ± 1.5%, P <0.001) but lower value (33 ± 6 vs 46 ± 7, P <0.001) than BG group. The wobble of SAP showed no difference between groups [median (inter-quartile range), 5.0 (4.1-7.5)% vs 5.2 (4.2-8.3)%, P = 0.557]. The numbers of anesthetic titrations in the FG group were significantly lower than the BG group (0 ± 0 vs 8 ± 5, P<0.001 for desflurane, 13 ± 13 vs 22 ± 17, P = 0.047 for remifentanil). Less wobble in BIS and reduced anesthetic titration without hemodynamic instability during the FG technique may be practical in balanced anesthesia using desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia. Clinical trial: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02283866).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241828
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Seong Mi Yang
Yoo Sun Jung
Chul-Woo Jung
Won Ho Kim
Soo Bin Yoon
Hyung-Chul Lee
spellingShingle Seong Mi Yang
Yoo Sun Jung
Chul-Woo Jung
Won Ho Kim
Soo Bin Yoon
Hyung-Chul Lee
Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Seong Mi Yang
Yoo Sun Jung
Chul-Woo Jung
Won Ho Kim
Soo Bin Yoon
Hyung-Chul Lee
author_sort Seong Mi Yang
title Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_short Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_full Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.
title_sort comparison of bispectral index-guided and fixed-gas concentration techniques in desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Anesthesia with desflurane and remifentanil can be maintained with either fixed or titrated desflurane concentration. We hypothesized that the fixed-gas concentration (FG) method would reduce the number of anesthetic titrations without hypnotic and hemodynamic instability compared to the bispectral index (BIS)-guided (BG) method. Forty-eight patients were randomly allocated to the FG or BG groups. In the FG group, desflurane vaporizer setting was fixed at 1 age-corrected minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). In the BG group, desflurane was titrated to target a BIS level at 50. Remifentanil was titrated to maintain a systolic arterial pressure (SAP) of 120 mmHg in both groups. Our primary endpoint was the hypnotic stability measured by the wobble of BIS in performance analysis, and the secondary endpoints included the wobble of SAP, mean BIS value during surgery, and the number of anesthetic titrations. The BIS in the FG group showed significantly less wobble (3.9 ± 1.1% vs 5.5 ± 1.5%, P <0.001) but lower value (33 ± 6 vs 46 ± 7, P <0.001) than BG group. The wobble of SAP showed no difference between groups [median (inter-quartile range), 5.0 (4.1-7.5)% vs 5.2 (4.2-8.3)%, P = 0.557]. The numbers of anesthetic titrations in the FG group were significantly lower than the BG group (0 ± 0 vs 8 ± 5, P<0.001 for desflurane, 13 ± 13 vs 22 ± 17, P = 0.047 for remifentanil). Less wobble in BIS and reduced anesthetic titration without hemodynamic instability during the FG technique may be practical in balanced anesthesia using desflurane and remifentanil anesthesia. Clinical trial: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02283866).
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241828
work_keys_str_mv AT seongmiyang comparisonofbispectralindexguidedandfixedgasconcentrationtechniquesindesfluraneandremifentanilanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yoosunjung comparisonofbispectralindexguidedandfixedgasconcentrationtechniquesindesfluraneandremifentanilanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chulwoojung comparisonofbispectralindexguidedandfixedgasconcentrationtechniquesindesfluraneandremifentanilanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wonhokim comparisonofbispectralindexguidedandfixedgasconcentrationtechniquesindesfluraneandremifentanilanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT soobinyoon comparisonofbispectralindexguidedandfixedgasconcentrationtechniquesindesfluraneandremifentanilanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hyungchullee comparisonofbispectralindexguidedandfixedgasconcentrationtechniquesindesfluraneandremifentanilanesthesiaarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1714802477736394752