Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Currently over 50% of drugs prescribed to children have not been evaluated properly for use in their age group. One key reason why children have been excluded from clinical trials is that they are not considered able to exercise mean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hein Irma M, Troost Pieter W, Lindeboom Robert, de Vries Martine C, Zwaan C, Lindauer Ramón J L
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-09-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/156
id doaj-320c530727a7480692f3c6d6ec80e0ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-320c530727a7480692f3c6d6ec80e0ea2020-11-24T21:40:23ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312012-09-0112115610.1186/1471-2431-12-156Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity studyHein Irma MTroost Pieter WLindeboom Robertde Vries Martine CZwaan CLindauer Ramón J L<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Currently over 50% of drugs prescribed to children have not been evaluated properly for use in their age group. One key reason why children have been excluded from clinical trials is that they are not considered able to exercise meaningful autonomy over the decision to participate. Dutch law states that competence to consent can be presumed present at the age of 12 and above; however, in pediatric practice children’s competence is not that clearly presented and the transition from assent to active consent is gradual. A gold standard for competence assessment in children does not exist. In this article we describe a study protocol on the development of a standardized tool for assessing competence to consent in research in children and adolescents.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>In this study we modified the MacCAT-CR, the best evaluated competence assessment tool for adults, for use in children and adolescents. We will administer the tool prospectively to a cohort of pediatric patients from 6 to18 years during the selection stages of ongoing clinical trials. The outcomes of the MacCAT-CR interviews will be compared to a reference standard, established by the judgments of clinical investigators, and an expert panel consisting of child psychiatrists, child psychologists and medical ethicists. The reliability, criterion-related validity and reproducibility of the tool will be determined. As MacCAT-CR is a multi-item scale consisting of 13 items, power was justified at 130–190 subjects, providing a minimum of 10–15 observations per item. MacCAT-CR outcomes will be correlated with age, life experience, IQ, ethnicity, socio-economic status and competence judgment of the parent(s). It is anticipated that 160 participants will be recruited over 2 years to complete enrollment.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>A validity study on an assessment tool of competence to consent is strongly needed in research practice, particularly in the child and adolescent population. In this study we will establish a reference standard of children’s competence to consent, combined with validation of an assessment instrument. Results can facilitate responsible involvement of children in clinical trials by further development of guidelines, health-care policies and legal policies.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/156CompetenceConsentAssessmentToolDrug trialInformed consentDecision makingResearchChildAdolescent
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hein Irma M
Troost Pieter W
Lindeboom Robert
de Vries Martine C
Zwaan C
Lindauer Ramón J L
spellingShingle Hein Irma M
Troost Pieter W
Lindeboom Robert
de Vries Martine C
Zwaan C
Lindauer Ramón J L
Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
BMC Pediatrics
Competence
Consent
Assessment
Tool
Drug trial
Informed consent
Decision making
Research
Child
Adolescent
author_facet Hein Irma M
Troost Pieter W
Lindeboom Robert
de Vries Martine C
Zwaan C
Lindauer Ramón J L
author_sort Hein Irma M
title Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
title_short Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
title_full Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
title_fullStr Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
title_sort assessing children’s competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity study
publisher BMC
series BMC Pediatrics
issn 1471-2431
publishDate 2012-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Currently over 50% of drugs prescribed to children have not been evaluated properly for use in their age group. One key reason why children have been excluded from clinical trials is that they are not considered able to exercise meaningful autonomy over the decision to participate. Dutch law states that competence to consent can be presumed present at the age of 12 and above; however, in pediatric practice children’s competence is not that clearly presented and the transition from assent to active consent is gradual. A gold standard for competence assessment in children does not exist. In this article we describe a study protocol on the development of a standardized tool for assessing competence to consent in research in children and adolescents.</p> <p>Methods/design</p> <p>In this study we modified the MacCAT-CR, the best evaluated competence assessment tool for adults, for use in children and adolescents. We will administer the tool prospectively to a cohort of pediatric patients from 6 to18 years during the selection stages of ongoing clinical trials. The outcomes of the MacCAT-CR interviews will be compared to a reference standard, established by the judgments of clinical investigators, and an expert panel consisting of child psychiatrists, child psychologists and medical ethicists. The reliability, criterion-related validity and reproducibility of the tool will be determined. As MacCAT-CR is a multi-item scale consisting of 13 items, power was justified at 130–190 subjects, providing a minimum of 10–15 observations per item. MacCAT-CR outcomes will be correlated with age, life experience, IQ, ethnicity, socio-economic status and competence judgment of the parent(s). It is anticipated that 160 participants will be recruited over 2 years to complete enrollment.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>A validity study on an assessment tool of competence to consent is strongly needed in research practice, particularly in the child and adolescent population. In this study we will establish a reference standard of children’s competence to consent, combined with validation of an assessment instrument. Results can facilitate responsible involvement of children in clinical trials by further development of guidelines, health-care policies and legal policies.</p>
topic Competence
Consent
Assessment
Tool
Drug trial
Informed consent
Decision making
Research
Child
Adolescent
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/12/156
work_keys_str_mv AT heinirmam assessingchildrenscompetencetoconsentinresearchbyastandardizedtoolavaliditystudy
AT troostpieterw assessingchildrenscompetencetoconsentinresearchbyastandardizedtoolavaliditystudy
AT lindeboomrobert assessingchildrenscompetencetoconsentinresearchbyastandardizedtoolavaliditystudy
AT devriesmartinec assessingchildrenscompetencetoconsentinresearchbyastandardizedtoolavaliditystudy
AT zwaanc assessingchildrenscompetencetoconsentinresearchbyastandardizedtoolavaliditystudy
AT lindauerramonjl assessingchildrenscompetencetoconsentinresearchbyastandardizedtoolavaliditystudy
_version_ 1725926206506795008