How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?

This article critically surveys the current bioethical and politico-philosophical debate about the ethical permissibility of a so-called ‘liberal eugenics’ and argues that neither the liberal argument for nor the liberal argument against human genetic enhancement is internally consistent as, ultima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nathan Van Camp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente 2014-05-01
Series:Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/124
id doaj-31fd3834dd724055a2e068de2c0d5e58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31fd3834dd724055a2e068de2c0d5e582020-11-25T01:14:05ZengAssociazione Culturale Humana.MenteHumana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies1972-12932014-05-01726How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?Nathan Van Camp0University of Antwerp, Belgium This article critically surveys the current bioethical and politico-philosophical debate about the ethical permissibility of a so-called ‘liberal eugenics’ and argues that neither the liberal argument for nor the liberal argument against human genetic enhancement is internally consistent as, ultimately, each ends up violating the very liberal principles it nonetheless pretends to defend. In particular, it will be shown that while the argument against a new eugenics necessarily entails a preemptive dehumanization of any potential enhanced form of life, the argument for it threatens to reduce any non-enhanced form of life to a “wrongful life” or a life not worth living. It will therefore be concluded that the specific stakes of this contentious issue cannot be grasped within a liberal conceptual framework. http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/124liberal eugenicsgenetic enhancementbioethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nathan Van Camp
spellingShingle Nathan Van Camp
How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?
Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
liberal eugenics
genetic enhancement
bioethics
author_facet Nathan Van Camp
author_sort Nathan Van Camp
title How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?
title_short How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?
title_full How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?
title_fullStr How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?
title_full_unstemmed How Liberal is (the Liberal Critique of) a Liberal Eugenics?
title_sort how liberal is (the liberal critique of) a liberal eugenics?
publisher Associazione Culturale Humana.Mente
series Humana.Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies
issn 1972-1293
publishDate 2014-05-01
description This article critically surveys the current bioethical and politico-philosophical debate about the ethical permissibility of a so-called ‘liberal eugenics’ and argues that neither the liberal argument for nor the liberal argument against human genetic enhancement is internally consistent as, ultimately, each ends up violating the very liberal principles it nonetheless pretends to defend. In particular, it will be shown that while the argument against a new eugenics necessarily entails a preemptive dehumanization of any potential enhanced form of life, the argument for it threatens to reduce any non-enhanced form of life to a “wrongful life” or a life not worth living. It will therefore be concluded that the specific stakes of this contentious issue cannot be grasped within a liberal conceptual framework.
topic liberal eugenics
genetic enhancement
bioethics
url http://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/124
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanvancamp howliberalistheliberalcritiqueofaliberaleugenics
_version_ 1725159026212208640