Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
Lukas Uebbing,1,2,* Lukas Klumpp,1,3,* Gregory K Webster,4 Raimar Löbenberg1 1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg Uni...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Drug Design, Development and Therapy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/justification-of-disintegration-testing-beyond-current-fda-criteria-us-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT |
id |
doaj-31f85e225b4e43f88c9be5d9ddf5cce4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-31f85e225b4e43f88c9be5d9ddf5cce42020-11-25T00:40:25ZengDove Medical PressDrug Design, Development and Therapy1177-88812017-04-01Volume 111163117432346Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico modelsUebbing LKlumpp LWebster GKLöbenberg RLukas Uebbing,1,2,* Lukas Klumpp,1,3,* Gregory K Webster,4 Raimar Löbenberg1 1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 3Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; 4Global Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: Drug product performance testing is an important part of quality-by-design approaches, but this process often lacks the underlying mechanistic understanding of the complex interactions between the disintegration and dissolution processes involved. Whereas a recent draft guideline by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed the replacement of dissolution testing with disintegration testing, the mentioned criteria are not globally accepted. This study provides scientific justification for using disintegration testing rather than dissolution testing as a quality control method for certain immediate release (IR) formulations. A mechanistic approach, which is beyond the current FDA criteria, is presented. Dissolution testing via United States Pharmacopeial Convention Apparatus II at various paddle speeds was performed for immediate and extended release formulations of metronidazole. Dissolution profile fitting via DDSolver and dissolution profile predictions via DDDPlus™ were performed. The results showed that Fickian diffusion and drug particle properties (DPP) were responsible for the dissolution of the IR tablets, and that formulation factors (eg, coning) impacted dissolution only at lower rotation speeds. Dissolution was completely formulation controlled if extended release tablets were tested and DPP were not important. To demonstrate that disintegration is the most important dosage form attribute when dissolution is DPP controlled, disintegration, intrinsic dissolution and dissolution testing were performed in conventional and disintegration impacting media (DIM). Tablet disintegration was affected by DIM and model fitting to the Korsmeyer–Peppas equation showed a growing effect of the formulation in DIM. DDDPlus was able to predict tablet dissolution and the intrinsic dissolution profiles in conventional media and DIM. The study showed that disintegration has to occur before DPP-dependent dissolution can happen. The study suggests that disintegration can be used as performance test of rapidly disintegrating tablets beyond the FDA criteria. The scientific criteria and justification is that dissolution has to be DPP dependent, originated from active pharmaceutical ingredient characteristics and formulations factors have to be negligible. Keywords: API, dissolution, disintegration, DDDPlus, quality-by-design, product specification, model fittinghttps://www.dovepress.com/justification-of-disintegration-testing-beyond-current-fda-criteria-us-peer-reviewed-article-DDDTDissolutiondisintegrationDDDPlusQuality by Designproduct specificationmodel fitting |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Uebbing L Klumpp L Webster GK Löbenberg R |
spellingShingle |
Uebbing L Klumpp L Webster GK Löbenberg R Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models Drug Design, Development and Therapy Dissolution disintegration DDDPlus Quality by Design product specification model fitting |
author_facet |
Uebbing L Klumpp L Webster GK Löbenberg R |
author_sort |
Uebbing L |
title |
Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models |
title_short |
Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models |
title_full |
Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models |
title_fullStr |
Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models |
title_sort |
justification of disintegration testing beyond current fda criteria using in vitro and in silico models |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy |
issn |
1177-8881 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Lukas Uebbing,1,2,* Lukas Klumpp,1,3,* Gregory K Webster,4 Raimar Löbenberg1 1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 3Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; 4Global Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: Drug product performance testing is an important part of quality-by-design approaches, but this process often lacks the underlying mechanistic understanding of the complex interactions between the disintegration and dissolution processes involved. Whereas a recent draft guideline by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed the replacement of dissolution testing with disintegration testing, the mentioned criteria are not globally accepted. This study provides scientific justification for using disintegration testing rather than dissolution testing as a quality control method for certain immediate release (IR) formulations. A mechanistic approach, which is beyond the current FDA criteria, is presented. Dissolution testing via United States Pharmacopeial Convention Apparatus II at various paddle speeds was performed for immediate and extended release formulations of metronidazole. Dissolution profile fitting via DDSolver and dissolution profile predictions via DDDPlus™ were performed. The results showed that Fickian diffusion and drug particle properties (DPP) were responsible for the dissolution of the IR tablets, and that formulation factors (eg, coning) impacted dissolution only at lower rotation speeds. Dissolution was completely formulation controlled if extended release tablets were tested and DPP were not important. To demonstrate that disintegration is the most important dosage form attribute when dissolution is DPP controlled, disintegration, intrinsic dissolution and dissolution testing were performed in conventional and disintegration impacting media (DIM). Tablet disintegration was affected by DIM and model fitting to the Korsmeyer–Peppas equation showed a growing effect of the formulation in DIM. DDDPlus was able to predict tablet dissolution and the intrinsic dissolution profiles in conventional media and DIM. The study showed that disintegration has to occur before DPP-dependent dissolution can happen. The study suggests that disintegration can be used as performance test of rapidly disintegrating tablets beyond the FDA criteria. The scientific criteria and justification is that dissolution has to be DPP dependent, originated from active pharmaceutical ingredient characteristics and formulations factors have to be negligible. Keywords: API, dissolution, disintegration, DDDPlus, quality-by-design, product specification, model fitting |
topic |
Dissolution disintegration DDDPlus Quality by Design product specification model fitting |
url |
https://www.dovepress.com/justification-of-disintegration-testing-beyond-current-fda-criteria-us-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT uebbingl justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels AT klumppl justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels AT webstergk justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels AT lobenbergr justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels |
_version_ |
1725290214750945280 |