Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models

Lukas Uebbing,1,2,* Lukas Klumpp,1,3,* Gregory K Webster,4 Raimar Löbenberg1 1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg Uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uebbing L, Klumpp L, Webster GK, Löbenberg R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-04-01
Series:Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/justification-of-disintegration-testing-beyond-current-fda-criteria-us-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT
id doaj-31f85e225b4e43f88c9be5d9ddf5cce4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31f85e225b4e43f88c9be5d9ddf5cce42020-11-25T00:40:25ZengDove Medical PressDrug Design, Development and Therapy1177-88812017-04-01Volume 111163117432346Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico modelsUebbing LKlumpp LWebster GKLöbenberg RLukas Uebbing,1,2,* Lukas Klumpp,1,3,* Gregory K Webster,4 Raimar Löbenberg1 1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 3Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; 4Global Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: Drug product performance testing is an important part of quality-by-design approaches, but this process often lacks the underlying mechanistic understanding of the complex interactions between the disintegration and dissolution processes involved. Whereas a recent draft guideline by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed the replacement of dissolution testing with disintegration testing, the mentioned criteria are not globally accepted. This study provides scientific justification for using disintegration testing rather than dissolution testing as a quality control method for certain immediate release (IR) formulations. A mechanistic approach, which is beyond the current FDA criteria, is presented. Dissolution testing via United States Pharmacopeial Convention Apparatus II at various paddle speeds was performed for immediate and extended release formulations of metronidazole. Dissolution profile fitting via DDSolver and dissolution profile predictions via DDDPlus™ were performed. The results showed that Fickian diffusion and drug particle properties (DPP) were responsible for the dissolution of the IR tablets, and that formulation factors (eg, coning) impacted dissolution only at lower rotation speeds. Dissolution was completely formulation controlled if extended release tablets were tested and DPP were not important. To demonstrate that disintegration is the most important dosage form attribute when dissolution is DPP controlled, disintegration, intrinsic dissolution and dissolution testing were performed in conventional and disintegration impacting media (DIM). Tablet disintegration was affected by DIM and model fitting to the Korsmeyer–Peppas equation showed a growing effect of the formulation in DIM. DDDPlus was able to predict tablet dissolution and the intrinsic dissolution profiles in conventional media and DIM. The study showed that disintegration has to occur before DPP-dependent dissolution can happen. The study suggests that disintegration can be used as performance test of rapidly disintegrating tablets beyond the FDA criteria. The scientific criteria and justification is that dissolution has to be DPP dependent, originated from active pharmaceutical ingredient characteristics and formulations factors have to be negligible. Keywords: API, dissolution, disintegration, DDDPlus, quality-by-design, product specification, model fittinghttps://www.dovepress.com/justification-of-disintegration-testing-beyond-current-fda-criteria-us-peer-reviewed-article-DDDTDissolutiondisintegrationDDDPlusQuality by Designproduct specificationmodel fitting
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Uebbing L
Klumpp L
Webster GK
Löbenberg R
spellingShingle Uebbing L
Klumpp L
Webster GK
Löbenberg R
Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Dissolution
disintegration
DDDPlus
Quality by Design
product specification
model fitting
author_facet Uebbing L
Klumpp L
Webster GK
Löbenberg R
author_sort Uebbing L
title Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
title_short Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
title_full Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
title_fullStr Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
title_full_unstemmed Justification of disintegration testing beyond current FDA criteria using in vitro and in silico models
title_sort justification of disintegration testing beyond current fda criteria using in vitro and in silico models
publisher Dove Medical Press
series Drug Design, Development and Therapy
issn 1177-8881
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Lukas Uebbing,1,2,* Lukas Klumpp,1,3,* Gregory K Webster,4 Raimar Löbenberg1 1Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Katz Group-Rexall Centre for Pharmacy and Health Research, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; 2Institute of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 3Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; 4Global Research and Development, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA *These authors contributed equally to this work Abstract: Drug product performance testing is an important part of quality-by-design approaches, but this process often lacks the underlying mechanistic understanding of the complex interactions between the disintegration and dissolution processes involved. Whereas a recent draft guideline by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has allowed the replacement of dissolution testing with disintegration testing, the mentioned criteria are not globally accepted. This study provides scientific justification for using disintegration testing rather than dissolution testing as a quality control method for certain immediate release (IR) formulations. A mechanistic approach, which is beyond the current FDA criteria, is presented. Dissolution testing via United States Pharmacopeial Convention Apparatus II at various paddle speeds was performed for immediate and extended release formulations of metronidazole. Dissolution profile fitting via DDSolver and dissolution profile predictions via DDDPlus™ were performed. The results showed that Fickian diffusion and drug particle properties (DPP) were responsible for the dissolution of the IR tablets, and that formulation factors (eg, coning) impacted dissolution only at lower rotation speeds. Dissolution was completely formulation controlled if extended release tablets were tested and DPP were not important. To demonstrate that disintegration is the most important dosage form attribute when dissolution is DPP controlled, disintegration, intrinsic dissolution and dissolution testing were performed in conventional and disintegration impacting media (DIM). Tablet disintegration was affected by DIM and model fitting to the Korsmeyer–Peppas equation showed a growing effect of the formulation in DIM. DDDPlus was able to predict tablet dissolution and the intrinsic dissolution profiles in conventional media and DIM. The study showed that disintegration has to occur before DPP-dependent dissolution can happen. The study suggests that disintegration can be used as performance test of rapidly disintegrating tablets beyond the FDA criteria. The scientific criteria and justification is that dissolution has to be DPP dependent, originated from active pharmaceutical ingredient characteristics and formulations factors have to be negligible. Keywords: API, dissolution, disintegration, DDDPlus, quality-by-design, product specification, model fitting
topic Dissolution
disintegration
DDDPlus
Quality by Design
product specification
model fitting
url https://www.dovepress.com/justification-of-disintegration-testing-beyond-current-fda-criteria-us-peer-reviewed-article-DDDT
work_keys_str_mv AT uebbingl justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels
AT klumppl justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels
AT webstergk justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels
AT lobenbergr justificationofdisintegrationtestingbeyondcurrentfdacriteriausinginvitroandinsilicomodels
_version_ 1725290214750945280