Racial bias in legal language

Although racial bias in the law is widely recognized, it remains unclear how these biases are in entrenched in the language of the law, judicial opinions. In this article, we build on recent research introducing an approach to measuring the presence of implicit racial bias in large-scale corpora. Ut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Douglas Rice, Jesse H. Rhodes, Tatishe Nteta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-05-01
Series:Research & Politics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848930
id doaj-31f6c2d9c074492ebfd352fb6dea92aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31f6c2d9c074492ebfd352fb6dea92aa2020-11-25T03:31:09ZengSAGE PublishingResearch & Politics2053-16802019-05-01610.1177/2053168019848930Racial bias in legal languageDouglas RiceJesse H. RhodesTatishe NtetaAlthough racial bias in the law is widely recognized, it remains unclear how these biases are in entrenched in the language of the law, judicial opinions. In this article, we build on recent research introducing an approach to measuring the presence of implicit racial bias in large-scale corpora. Utilizing an original dataset of more than one million appellate court opinions from US state and federal courts, we estimate word embeddings for the more than 400,000 most common words found in legal opinions. In a series of analyses, we find strong and consistent evidence of implicit racial bias, as African-American names are more frequently associated with unpleasant or negative concepts, whereas European-American names are more frequently associated with pleasant or positive concepts. The results have stark implications for work on the neutrality of the legal system as well as for our understanding of the entrenchment of bias through the law.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848930
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Douglas Rice
Jesse H. Rhodes
Tatishe Nteta
spellingShingle Douglas Rice
Jesse H. Rhodes
Tatishe Nteta
Racial bias in legal language
Research & Politics
author_facet Douglas Rice
Jesse H. Rhodes
Tatishe Nteta
author_sort Douglas Rice
title Racial bias in legal language
title_short Racial bias in legal language
title_full Racial bias in legal language
title_fullStr Racial bias in legal language
title_full_unstemmed Racial bias in legal language
title_sort racial bias in legal language
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Research & Politics
issn 2053-1680
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Although racial bias in the law is widely recognized, it remains unclear how these biases are in entrenched in the language of the law, judicial opinions. In this article, we build on recent research introducing an approach to measuring the presence of implicit racial bias in large-scale corpora. Utilizing an original dataset of more than one million appellate court opinions from US state and federal courts, we estimate word embeddings for the more than 400,000 most common words found in legal opinions. In a series of analyses, we find strong and consistent evidence of implicit racial bias, as African-American names are more frequently associated with unpleasant or negative concepts, whereas European-American names are more frequently associated with pleasant or positive concepts. The results have stark implications for work on the neutrality of the legal system as well as for our understanding of the entrenchment of bias through the law.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848930
work_keys_str_mv AT douglasrice racialbiasinlegallanguage
AT jessehrhodes racialbiasinlegallanguage
AT tatishenteta racialbiasinlegallanguage
_version_ 1724573362287542272