Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space

Abstract The architecture of security is often thought of in terms of situational crime prevention and defensible space. In this article, we argue that the emergence of smart cities and smart technology compel a broader conceptualisation of the design of security, which has the potential to transfor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marc Schuilenburg, Rik Peeters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-10-01
Series:City, Territory and Architecture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0090-8
id doaj-31f1e13038044400a079ad2fac359562
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31f1e13038044400a079ad2fac3595622020-11-24T21:41:37ZengSpringerOpenCity, Territory and Architecture2195-27012018-10-01511910.1186/s40410-018-0090-8Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public spaceMarc Schuilenburg0Rik Peeters1VU UniversityCentro de Investigación y Docencia EconómicasAbstract The architecture of security is often thought of in terms of situational crime prevention and defensible space. In this article, we argue that the emergence of smart cities and smart technology compel a broader conceptualisation of the design of security, which has the potential to transform the governance of our urban landscape. Drawing on the case of the city of Eindhoven’s “De-escalate” project—in which sound, smell and lighting programming combined with data analysis is used to reduce violence and aggression in the inner-city entertainment area—we show that the securitisation of urban space can also be pursued by positive triggers for behaviour. The case allows us to rethink the architecture of security in terms of pastoral power—Foucault’s notion of governing individuals and populations through care and protection. In sharp contrast with more hostile forms of situational crime prevention and defensible space, which seek to “design out” unwanted behaviour by closing off spaces, pastoral architecture is inclusive and provides “scripts” for desirable behaviour in public space. Moreover, this architecture is incorporated and designed into the existing built environment, operates through psychological triggers rather than physical ones, and is principally developed by private companies rather than the state.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0090-8Smart citySmart technologyPastoral powerArchitectureSecuritisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marc Schuilenburg
Rik Peeters
spellingShingle Marc Schuilenburg
Rik Peeters
Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
City, Territory and Architecture
Smart city
Smart technology
Pastoral power
Architecture
Securitisation
author_facet Marc Schuilenburg
Rik Peeters
author_sort Marc Schuilenburg
title Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
title_short Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
title_full Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
title_fullStr Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
title_full_unstemmed Smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
title_sort smart cities and the architecture of security: pastoral power and the scripted design of public space
publisher SpringerOpen
series City, Territory and Architecture
issn 2195-2701
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Abstract The architecture of security is often thought of in terms of situational crime prevention and defensible space. In this article, we argue that the emergence of smart cities and smart technology compel a broader conceptualisation of the design of security, which has the potential to transform the governance of our urban landscape. Drawing on the case of the city of Eindhoven’s “De-escalate” project—in which sound, smell and lighting programming combined with data analysis is used to reduce violence and aggression in the inner-city entertainment area—we show that the securitisation of urban space can also be pursued by positive triggers for behaviour. The case allows us to rethink the architecture of security in terms of pastoral power—Foucault’s notion of governing individuals and populations through care and protection. In sharp contrast with more hostile forms of situational crime prevention and defensible space, which seek to “design out” unwanted behaviour by closing off spaces, pastoral architecture is inclusive and provides “scripts” for desirable behaviour in public space. Moreover, this architecture is incorporated and designed into the existing built environment, operates through psychological triggers rather than physical ones, and is principally developed by private companies rather than the state.
topic Smart city
Smart technology
Pastoral power
Architecture
Securitisation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40410-018-0090-8
work_keys_str_mv AT marcschuilenburg smartcitiesandthearchitectureofsecuritypastoralpowerandthescripteddesignofpublicspace
AT rikpeeters smartcitiesandthearchitectureofsecuritypastoralpowerandthescripteddesignofpublicspace
_version_ 1725921027403284480