Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia

The World Bank and Transparency International rank the Central Asian republics as highly corrupt. This is an opinion that is also shared by international media and by NGO personnel and academics working on the ground in these countries. Yet, the kind of practices that are labelled as “corrupt” by th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rune Steenberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tallinn University 2021-06-01
Series:Studies of Transition States and Societies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/931/769
id doaj-31eb688249e143eba1601a616a6e8537
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31eb688249e143eba1601a616a6e85372021-07-01T09:36:12ZengTallinn University Studies of Transition States and Societies1736-874X1736-87582021-06-01131320Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central AsiaRune SteenbergThe World Bank and Transparency International rank the Central Asian republics as highly corrupt. This is an opinion that is also shared by international media and by NGO personnel and academics working on the ground in these countries. Yet, the kind of practices that are labelled as “corrupt” by these observers seem much too diverse to meaningfully be covered by the same term, such as illicit selling and buying of government contracts at the highest level; tax evasion in the millions; the faster processing of a passport for a relative; and a taxi driver bribing the traffic police. This presents both an analytical and an ethical problem. This article argues that condemning discourses on corruption are often used by the powerful both nationally and internationally to dominate colonised and marginalised groups. Such groups, excluded from or exploited within formal structures, rely on networks and communities for their livelihoods. The upkeep of these social relations comes into conflict with the imperatives of state law and bureaucracy. Anti-corruption thus becomes a weapon of the strong against the weak and aligns with a long history of colonial tradition of domination and vilification of those “yet-to-be-civilised.” Its focus on regions of the Global South such as Central Asia marks a continuation of colonial legacy but also the region's continued marginality in the capitalist world system. This article posits that in order solve these analytical and ethical problems, we must be careful not to conflate a legal state-notion of corruption with a moral one thus accepting as default the perspective of the dominant groups running states and organisations.http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/931/769corruptionkinshipbureaucracykyrgyzstanxinjiangcoloniality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rune Steenberg
spellingShingle Rune Steenberg
Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia
Studies of Transition States and Societies
corruption
kinship
bureaucracy
kyrgyzstan
xinjiang
coloniality
author_facet Rune Steenberg
author_sort Rune Steenberg
title Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia
title_short Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia
title_full Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia
title_fullStr Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia
title_full_unstemmed Legitimate Corruption: Ethics of Bureaucracy and Kinship in Central Asia
title_sort legitimate corruption: ethics of bureaucracy and kinship in central asia
publisher Tallinn University
series Studies of Transition States and Societies
issn 1736-874X
1736-8758
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The World Bank and Transparency International rank the Central Asian republics as highly corrupt. This is an opinion that is also shared by international media and by NGO personnel and academics working on the ground in these countries. Yet, the kind of practices that are labelled as “corrupt” by these observers seem much too diverse to meaningfully be covered by the same term, such as illicit selling and buying of government contracts at the highest level; tax evasion in the millions; the faster processing of a passport for a relative; and a taxi driver bribing the traffic police. This presents both an analytical and an ethical problem. This article argues that condemning discourses on corruption are often used by the powerful both nationally and internationally to dominate colonised and marginalised groups. Such groups, excluded from or exploited within formal structures, rely on networks and communities for their livelihoods. The upkeep of these social relations comes into conflict with the imperatives of state law and bureaucracy. Anti-corruption thus becomes a weapon of the strong against the weak and aligns with a long history of colonial tradition of domination and vilification of those “yet-to-be-civilised.” Its focus on regions of the Global South such as Central Asia marks a continuation of colonial legacy but also the region's continued marginality in the capitalist world system. This article posits that in order solve these analytical and ethical problems, we must be careful not to conflate a legal state-notion of corruption with a moral one thus accepting as default the perspective of the dominant groups running states and organisations.
topic corruption
kinship
bureaucracy
kyrgyzstan
xinjiang
coloniality
url http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/931/769
work_keys_str_mv AT runesteenberg legitimatecorruptionethicsofbureaucracyandkinshipincentralasia
_version_ 1721347023358132224