Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?

Biometric recognition is currently implemented in several authentication contexts, most recently in mobile devices where it is expected to complement or even replace traditional authentication modalities such as PIN (Personal Identification Number) or passwords. The assumed convenience characteristi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramon Blanco-Gonzalo, Chiara Lunerti, Raul Sanchez-Reillo, Richard Guest
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5864003?pdf=render
id doaj-31e949a3d8b54397a113ae8090356dd3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31e949a3d8b54397a113ae8090356dd32020-11-25T02:48:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01133e019411110.1371/journal.pone.0194111Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?Ramon Blanco-GonzaloChiara LunertiRaul Sanchez-ReilloRichard GuestBiometric recognition is currently implemented in several authentication contexts, most recently in mobile devices where it is expected to complement or even replace traditional authentication modalities such as PIN (Personal Identification Number) or passwords. The assumed convenience characteristics of biometrics are transparency, reliability and ease-of-use, however, the question of whether biometric recognition is as intuitive and straightforward to use is open to debate. Can biometric systems make some tasks easier for people with accessibility concerns? To investigate this question, an accessibility evaluation of a mobile app was conducted where test subjects withdraw money from a fictitious ATM (Automated Teller Machine) scenario. The biometric authentication mechanisms used include face, voice, and fingerprint. Furthermore, we employed traditional modalities of PIN and pattern in order to check if biometric recognition is indeed a real improvement. The trial test subjects within this work were people with real-life accessibility concerns. A group of people without accessibility concerns also participated, providing a baseline performance. Experimental results are presented concerning performance, HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) and accessibility, grouped according to category of accessibility concern. Our results reveal links between individual modalities and user category establishing guidelines for future accessible biometric products.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5864003?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ramon Blanco-Gonzalo
Chiara Lunerti
Raul Sanchez-Reillo
Richard Guest
spellingShingle Ramon Blanco-Gonzalo
Chiara Lunerti
Raul Sanchez-Reillo
Richard Guest
Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ramon Blanco-Gonzalo
Chiara Lunerti
Raul Sanchez-Reillo
Richard Guest
author_sort Ramon Blanco-Gonzalo
title Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
title_short Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
title_full Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
title_fullStr Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
title_full_unstemmed Biometrics: Accessibility challenge or opportunity?
title_sort biometrics: accessibility challenge or opportunity?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Biometric recognition is currently implemented in several authentication contexts, most recently in mobile devices where it is expected to complement or even replace traditional authentication modalities such as PIN (Personal Identification Number) or passwords. The assumed convenience characteristics of biometrics are transparency, reliability and ease-of-use, however, the question of whether biometric recognition is as intuitive and straightforward to use is open to debate. Can biometric systems make some tasks easier for people with accessibility concerns? To investigate this question, an accessibility evaluation of a mobile app was conducted where test subjects withdraw money from a fictitious ATM (Automated Teller Machine) scenario. The biometric authentication mechanisms used include face, voice, and fingerprint. Furthermore, we employed traditional modalities of PIN and pattern in order to check if biometric recognition is indeed a real improvement. The trial test subjects within this work were people with real-life accessibility concerns. A group of people without accessibility concerns also participated, providing a baseline performance. Experimental results are presented concerning performance, HCI (Human-Computer Interaction) and accessibility, grouped according to category of accessibility concern. Our results reveal links between individual modalities and user category establishing guidelines for future accessible biometric products.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5864003?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ramonblancogonzalo biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity
AT chiaralunerti biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity
AT raulsanchezreillo biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity
AT richardguest biometricsaccessibilitychallengeoropportunity
_version_ 1724748080737157120