Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
Busch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Entropy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/5/174 |
id |
doaj-31db7efe0e1b48c7be4e2a3477fa788f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-31db7efe0e1b48c7be4e2a3477fa788f2020-11-24T20:56:06ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002016-05-0118517410.3390/e18050174e18050174Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and WernerDavid Marcus Appleby0Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaBusch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission. We then examine BLW’s criticisms in the light of our analysis. We argue that, although the BLW approach favour (based on the Wasserstein two-deviation) has its uses, there are important physical situations where an operator approach is preferable. We also discuss the reason why the error-disturbance relation is still giving rise to controversies almost a century after Heisenberg first stated his microscope argument. We argue that the source of the difficulties is the problem of interpretation, which is not so wholly disconnected from experimental practicalities as is sometimes supposed.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/5/174error disturbance principleuncertainty principlequantum measurementHeisenberg |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
David Marcus Appleby |
spellingShingle |
David Marcus Appleby Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner Entropy error disturbance principle uncertainty principle quantum measurement Heisenberg |
author_facet |
David Marcus Appleby |
author_sort |
David Marcus Appleby |
title |
Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner |
title_short |
Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner |
title_full |
Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner |
title_fullStr |
Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner |
title_sort |
quantum errors and disturbances: response to busch, lahti and werner |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Entropy |
issn |
1099-4300 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
Busch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission. We then examine BLW’s criticisms in the light of our analysis. We argue that, although the BLW approach favour (based on the Wasserstein two-deviation) has its uses, there are important physical situations where an operator approach is preferable. We also discuss the reason why the error-disturbance relation is still giving rise to controversies almost a century after Heisenberg first stated his microscope argument. We argue that the source of the difficulties is the problem of interpretation, which is not so wholly disconnected from experimental practicalities as is sometimes supposed. |
topic |
error disturbance principle uncertainty principle quantum measurement Heisenberg |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/5/174 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT davidmarcusappleby quantumerrorsanddisturbancesresponsetobuschlahtiandwerner |
_version_ |
1716790757353848832 |