Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner

Busch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Marcus Appleby
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-05-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/5/174
id doaj-31db7efe0e1b48c7be4e2a3477fa788f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31db7efe0e1b48c7be4e2a3477fa788f2020-11-24T20:56:06ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002016-05-0118517410.3390/e18050174e18050174Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and WernerDavid Marcus Appleby0Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaBusch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission. We then examine BLW’s criticisms in the light of our analysis. We argue that, although the BLW approach favour (based on the Wasserstein two-deviation) has its uses, there are important physical situations where an operator approach is preferable. We also discuss the reason why the error-disturbance relation is still giving rise to controversies almost a century after Heisenberg first stated his microscope argument. We argue that the source of the difficulties is the problem of interpretation, which is not so wholly disconnected from experimental practicalities as is sometimes supposed.http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/5/174error disturbance principleuncertainty principlequantum measurementHeisenberg
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Marcus Appleby
spellingShingle David Marcus Appleby
Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
Entropy
error disturbance principle
uncertainty principle
quantum measurement
Heisenberg
author_facet David Marcus Appleby
author_sort David Marcus Appleby
title Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
title_short Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
title_full Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
title_fullStr Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
title_full_unstemmed Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
title_sort quantum errors and disturbances: response to busch, lahti and werner
publisher MDPI AG
series Entropy
issn 1099-4300
publishDate 2016-05-01
description Busch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission. We then examine BLW’s criticisms in the light of our analysis. We argue that, although the BLW approach favour (based on the Wasserstein two-deviation) has its uses, there are important physical situations where an operator approach is preferable. We also discuss the reason why the error-disturbance relation is still giving rise to controversies almost a century after Heisenberg first stated his microscope argument. We argue that the source of the difficulties is the problem of interpretation, which is not so wholly disconnected from experimental practicalities as is sometimes supposed.
topic error disturbance principle
uncertainty principle
quantum measurement
Heisenberg
url http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/18/5/174
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmarcusappleby quantumerrorsanddisturbancesresponsetobuschlahtiandwerner
_version_ 1716790757353848832