The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU
The paper evaluates inter-institutional negotiations on the Directive on the protection of whistleblowers’ rights. The author shows how the European Parliament succeeded in inducing the Council to compromise in a long and persistent struggle, while the Member States took initially opposite positions...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/potemkina22019.pdf |
id |
doaj-31d8f5f275f445f4998cb37cd1083cca |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-31d8f5f275f445f4998cb37cd1083cca2020-11-25T01:30:03ZrusInstitute of Europe Russian Academy of SciencesНаучно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН2618-79142618-79142019-04-0128929810.15211/vestnikieran220199298The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EUOlga Potemkina0Doctor of Sciences (Politics), Head of the Department of European Integration Studies, Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of SciencesThe paper evaluates inter-institutional negotiations on the Directive on the protection of whistleblowers’ rights. The author shows how the European Parliament succeeded in inducing the Council to compromise in a long and persistent struggle, while the Member States took initially opposite positions on the three-stage informing procedure. The author demonstrates complexity of the legislative process in the European Union, which may take years until legislators give their consent. The positions of MS on the issue of information hierarchy as well as their motivations are shown. The author comes to conclusion that the EU institutions managed to reach agreement on the Directive thanks to forthcoming European Parliament elections, on the eve of which it was important to demonstrate the concrete results of legislative activity.http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/potemkina22019.pdfwhistleblowersprotection of rightsdirectiveinter-institutional negotiationstrade unionseuropean parliamenteu commissioneu councilblocking minority |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Olga Potemkina |
spellingShingle |
Olga Potemkina The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН whistleblowers protection of rights directive inter-institutional negotiations trade unions european parliament eu commission eu council blocking minority |
author_facet |
Olga Potemkina |
author_sort |
Olga Potemkina |
title |
The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU |
title_short |
The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU |
title_full |
The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU |
title_fullStr |
The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Rights of Informants in the Center of the Social and Political Life of the EU |
title_sort |
rights of informants in the center of the social and political life of the eu |
publisher |
Institute of Europe Russian Academy of Sciences |
series |
Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН |
issn |
2618-7914 2618-7914 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
The paper evaluates inter-institutional negotiations on the Directive on the protection of whistleblowers’ rights. The author shows how the European Parliament succeeded in inducing the Council to compromise in a long and persistent struggle, while the Member States took initially opposite positions on the three-stage informing procedure. The author demonstrates complexity of the legislative process in the European Union, which may take years until legislators give their consent. The positions of MS on the issue of information hierarchy as well as their motivations are shown. The author comes to conclusion that the EU institutions managed to reach agreement on the Directive thanks to forthcoming European Parliament elections, on the eve of which it was important to demonstrate the concrete results of legislative activity. |
topic |
whistleblowers protection of rights directive inter-institutional negotiations trade unions european parliament eu commission eu council blocking minority |
url |
http://vestnikieran.instituteofeurope.ru/images/potemkina22019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT olgapotemkina therightsofinformantsinthecenterofthesocialandpoliticallifeoftheeu AT olgapotemkina rightsofinformantsinthecenterofthesocialandpoliticallifeoftheeu |
_version_ |
1725093944488886272 |