FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis

This study focuses on investigating and predicting two hidden structures: plant root system architecture and non-visible bubbles in plexiglass. Current approaches are damaging, expensive, or time-consuming. Infrared imaging was used to study the root structure and depth of small plants and to detect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xijin Shi, Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Roseli Aparecida Francelin Romero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/15/5159
id doaj-31d1ea5b93ed4629a737597a2e7217c1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31d1ea5b93ed4629a737597a2e7217c12021-08-06T15:31:37ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-07-01215159515910.3390/s21155159FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure AnalysisXijin Shi0Sheng-Jen Hsieh1Roseli Aparecida Francelin Romero2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USADepartment of Computer Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 13566-590, SP, BrazilThis study focuses on investigating and predicting two hidden structures: plant root system architecture and non-visible bubbles in plexiglass. Current approaches are damaging, expensive, or time-consuming. Infrared imaging was used to study the root structure and depth of small plants and to detect the diameter and depth of bubbles in plexiglass. A finite element analysis (FEA) model was built to simulate the infrared imaging process to realize the detection and prediction given the amount of heat flux required to obtain thermal images and data. For the root system, based on a tree structure thermal profile over time derived from the FEA model, a line scan method was developed to predict root structure. The main root branches can be viewed from the detection results. Polynomial regression, support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were designed to predict root depth. For bubble defects, three ANN models were developed to predict bubble size using temperature data generated by the FEA model. Results indicated that these models provide valid predictions. Statistical tests were applied to evaluate and compare the above predictive models. Results suggest that infrared imaging and machine learning models can be used to provide information on both hidden structures.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/15/5159finite element analysismachine learningroot system architecturenon-visible bubble
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xijin Shi
Sheng-Jen Hsieh
Roseli Aparecida Francelin Romero
spellingShingle Xijin Shi
Sheng-Jen Hsieh
Roseli Aparecida Francelin Romero
FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis
Sensors
finite element analysis
machine learning
root system architecture
non-visible bubble
author_facet Xijin Shi
Sheng-Jen Hsieh
Roseli Aparecida Francelin Romero
author_sort Xijin Shi
title FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis
title_short FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis
title_full FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis
title_fullStr FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis
title_full_unstemmed FEA and Machine Learning Techniques for Hidden Structure Analysis
title_sort fea and machine learning techniques for hidden structure analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2021-07-01
description This study focuses on investigating and predicting two hidden structures: plant root system architecture and non-visible bubbles in plexiglass. Current approaches are damaging, expensive, or time-consuming. Infrared imaging was used to study the root structure and depth of small plants and to detect the diameter and depth of bubbles in plexiglass. A finite element analysis (FEA) model was built to simulate the infrared imaging process to realize the detection and prediction given the amount of heat flux required to obtain thermal images and data. For the root system, based on a tree structure thermal profile over time derived from the FEA model, a line scan method was developed to predict root structure. The main root branches can be viewed from the detection results. Polynomial regression, support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN) models were designed to predict root depth. For bubble defects, three ANN models were developed to predict bubble size using temperature data generated by the FEA model. Results indicated that these models provide valid predictions. Statistical tests were applied to evaluate and compare the above predictive models. Results suggest that infrared imaging and machine learning models can be used to provide information on both hidden structures.
topic finite element analysis
machine learning
root system architecture
non-visible bubble
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/15/5159
work_keys_str_mv AT xijinshi feaandmachinelearningtechniquesforhiddenstructureanalysis
AT shengjenhsieh feaandmachinelearningtechniquesforhiddenstructureanalysis
AT roseliaparecidafrancelinromero feaandmachinelearningtechniquesforhiddenstructureanalysis
_version_ 1721217566864572416