Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand

When we grasp an object using one hand, the opposite hemisphere predominantly guides the motor control of grasp movements (Davare et al. 2007; Rice et al. 2007). However, it is unclear whether visual object analysis for grasp control relies more on inputs (a) from the contralateral than the ipsilate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ada eLe, Matthias eNiemeier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00782/full
id doaj-31d10080d90840f08146781cd06221ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31d10080d90840f08146781cd06221ae2020-11-25T02:10:03ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612014-10-01810.3389/fnhum.2014.0078296710Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One HandAda eLe0Matthias eNiemeier1University of Toronto ScarboroughUniversity of Toronto ScarboroughWhen we grasp an object using one hand, the opposite hemisphere predominantly guides the motor control of grasp movements (Davare et al. 2007; Rice et al. 2007). However, it is unclear whether visual object analysis for grasp control relies more on inputs (a) from the contralateral than the ipsilateral visual field, (b) from one dominant visual field regardless of the grasping hand, or (c) from both visual fields equally. For bimanual grasping of a single object we have recently demonstrated a visual field preference for the left visual field (Le and Niemeier 2013a, 2013b), consistent with a general right-hemisphere dominance for sensorimotor control of bimanual grasps (Le et al., 2013). But visual field differences have never been tested for unimanual grasping. Therefore, here we asked right-handed participants to fixate to the left or right of an object and then grasp the object either with their right or left hand using a precision grip. We found that participants grasping with their right hand performed better with objects in the right visual field: maximum grip apertures (MGAs) were more closely matched to the object width and were smaller than for objects in the left visual field. In contrast, when people grasped with their left hand, preferences switched to the left visual field. What is more, MGA scaling showed greater visual field differences compared to right-hand grasping. Our data suggest that, visual object analysis for unimanual grasping shows a preference for visual information from the ipsilateral visual field, and that the left hemisphere is better equipped to control grasps in both visual fields.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00782/fulllateralizationhemispheric specializationcontralateralgraspingvisual field effectunimanual
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ada eLe
Matthias eNiemeier
spellingShingle Ada eLe
Matthias eNiemeier
Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
lateralization
hemispheric specialization
contralateral
grasping
visual field effect
unimanual
author_facet Ada eLe
Matthias eNiemeier
author_sort Ada eLe
title Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand
title_short Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand
title_full Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand
title_fullStr Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand
title_full_unstemmed Visual Field Preferences of Object Analysis for Grasping with One Hand
title_sort visual field preferences of object analysis for grasping with one hand
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2014-10-01
description When we grasp an object using one hand, the opposite hemisphere predominantly guides the motor control of grasp movements (Davare et al. 2007; Rice et al. 2007). However, it is unclear whether visual object analysis for grasp control relies more on inputs (a) from the contralateral than the ipsilateral visual field, (b) from one dominant visual field regardless of the grasping hand, or (c) from both visual fields equally. For bimanual grasping of a single object we have recently demonstrated a visual field preference for the left visual field (Le and Niemeier 2013a, 2013b), consistent with a general right-hemisphere dominance for sensorimotor control of bimanual grasps (Le et al., 2013). But visual field differences have never been tested for unimanual grasping. Therefore, here we asked right-handed participants to fixate to the left or right of an object and then grasp the object either with their right or left hand using a precision grip. We found that participants grasping with their right hand performed better with objects in the right visual field: maximum grip apertures (MGAs) were more closely matched to the object width and were smaller than for objects in the left visual field. In contrast, when people grasped with their left hand, preferences switched to the left visual field. What is more, MGA scaling showed greater visual field differences compared to right-hand grasping. Our data suggest that, visual object analysis for unimanual grasping shows a preference for visual information from the ipsilateral visual field, and that the left hemisphere is better equipped to control grasps in both visual fields.
topic lateralization
hemispheric specialization
contralateral
grasping
visual field effect
unimanual
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00782/full
work_keys_str_mv AT adaele visualfieldpreferencesofobjectanalysisforgraspingwithonehand
AT matthiaseniemeier visualfieldpreferencesofobjectanalysisforgraspingwithonehand
_version_ 1724921033394225152