Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant

First generation retinal prostheses containing 50-60 electrodes are currently in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical upper limit (best possible) reading performance attainable with a state-of-the-art 60-channel retinal implant and to find the optimum viewing co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelica ePerez Fornos, Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder, Marco ePelizzone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2011-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2011.00057/full
id doaj-31c3073a247d4783b1ac290c503c9fc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31c3073a247d4783b1ac290c503c9fc82020-11-24T23:13:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2011-05-01510.3389/fnins.2011.000578994Reading with a simulated 60-channel implantAngelica ePerez Fornos0Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder1Marco ePelizzone2Geneva University HospitalsGeneva University HospitalsGeneva University HospitalsFirst generation retinal prostheses containing 50-60 electrodes are currently in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical upper limit (best possible) reading performance attainable with a state-of-the-art 60-channel retinal implant and to find the optimum viewing conditions for the task. Four normal volunteers performed full-page text reading tasks with a low resolution, 60-pixel viewing window that was stabilized in the central visual field. Two parameters were systematically varied: (1) spatial resolution (image magnification) and (2) the orientation of the rectangular viewing window. Performance was measured in terms of reading accuracy (% of correctly read words) and reading rates (words/min). Maximum reading performances were reached at spatial resolutions between 3.6 and 6 pixels/char. Performance declined outside this range for all subjects. In optimum viewing conditions (4.5 pixels/char), subjects achieved almost perfect reading accuracy and mean reading rates of 26 words/min for the vertical viewing window and of 34 words/min for the horizontal viewing window. These results suggest that, theoretically, some reading abilities can be restored with actual state-of-the-art retinal implant prototypes if image magnification is within an optimum range. Future retinal implants providing higher pixel resolutions, thus allowing for a wider visual span might allow faster reading rates.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2011.00057/fullPsychophysicsNeuroscienceResolutionSpatial Visionreadingfield of view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Angelica ePerez Fornos
Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder
Marco ePelizzone
spellingShingle Angelica ePerez Fornos
Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder
Marco ePelizzone
Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Psychophysics
Neuroscience
Resolution
Spatial Vision
reading
field of view
author_facet Angelica ePerez Fornos
Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder
Marco ePelizzone
author_sort Angelica ePerez Fornos
title Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
title_short Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
title_full Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
title_fullStr Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
title_full_unstemmed Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
title_sort reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2011-05-01
description First generation retinal prostheses containing 50-60 electrodes are currently in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical upper limit (best possible) reading performance attainable with a state-of-the-art 60-channel retinal implant and to find the optimum viewing conditions for the task. Four normal volunteers performed full-page text reading tasks with a low resolution, 60-pixel viewing window that was stabilized in the central visual field. Two parameters were systematically varied: (1) spatial resolution (image magnification) and (2) the orientation of the rectangular viewing window. Performance was measured in terms of reading accuracy (% of correctly read words) and reading rates (words/min). Maximum reading performances were reached at spatial resolutions between 3.6 and 6 pixels/char. Performance declined outside this range for all subjects. In optimum viewing conditions (4.5 pixels/char), subjects achieved almost perfect reading accuracy and mean reading rates of 26 words/min for the vertical viewing window and of 34 words/min for the horizontal viewing window. These results suggest that, theoretically, some reading abilities can be restored with actual state-of-the-art retinal implant prototypes if image magnification is within an optimum range. Future retinal implants providing higher pixel resolutions, thus allowing for a wider visual span might allow faster reading rates.
topic Psychophysics
Neuroscience
Resolution
Spatial Vision
reading
field of view
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2011.00057/full
work_keys_str_mv AT angelicaeperezfornos readingwithasimulated60channelimplant
AT jorgrudolphsommerhalder readingwithasimulated60channelimplant
AT marcoepelizzone readingwithasimulated60channelimplant
_version_ 1725596135928627200