Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant
First generation retinal prostheses containing 50-60 electrodes are currently in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical upper limit (best possible) reading performance attainable with a state-of-the-art 60-channel retinal implant and to find the optimum viewing co...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2011-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neuroscience |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2011.00057/full |
id |
doaj-31c3073a247d4783b1ac290c503c9fc8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-31c3073a247d4783b1ac290c503c9fc82020-11-24T23:13:55ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2011-05-01510.3389/fnins.2011.000578994Reading with a simulated 60-channel implantAngelica ePerez Fornos0Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder1Marco ePelizzone2Geneva University HospitalsGeneva University HospitalsGeneva University HospitalsFirst generation retinal prostheses containing 50-60 electrodes are currently in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical upper limit (best possible) reading performance attainable with a state-of-the-art 60-channel retinal implant and to find the optimum viewing conditions for the task. Four normal volunteers performed full-page text reading tasks with a low resolution, 60-pixel viewing window that was stabilized in the central visual field. Two parameters were systematically varied: (1) spatial resolution (image magnification) and (2) the orientation of the rectangular viewing window. Performance was measured in terms of reading accuracy (% of correctly read words) and reading rates (words/min). Maximum reading performances were reached at spatial resolutions between 3.6 and 6 pixels/char. Performance declined outside this range for all subjects. In optimum viewing conditions (4.5 pixels/char), subjects achieved almost perfect reading accuracy and mean reading rates of 26 words/min for the vertical viewing window and of 34 words/min for the horizontal viewing window. These results suggest that, theoretically, some reading abilities can be restored with actual state-of-the-art retinal implant prototypes if image magnification is within an optimum range. Future retinal implants providing higher pixel resolutions, thus allowing for a wider visual span might allow faster reading rates.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2011.00057/fullPsychophysicsNeuroscienceResolutionSpatial Visionreadingfield of view |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Angelica ePerez Fornos Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder Marco ePelizzone |
spellingShingle |
Angelica ePerez Fornos Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder Marco ePelizzone Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant Frontiers in Neuroscience Psychophysics Neuroscience Resolution Spatial Vision reading field of view |
author_facet |
Angelica ePerez Fornos Jörg Rudolph Sommerhalder Marco ePelizzone |
author_sort |
Angelica ePerez Fornos |
title |
Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant |
title_short |
Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant |
title_full |
Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant |
title_fullStr |
Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reading with a simulated 60-channel implant |
title_sort |
reading with a simulated 60-channel implant |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Neuroscience |
issn |
1662-453X |
publishDate |
2011-05-01 |
description |
First generation retinal prostheses containing 50-60 electrodes are currently in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the theoretical upper limit (best possible) reading performance attainable with a state-of-the-art 60-channel retinal implant and to find the optimum viewing conditions for the task. Four normal volunteers performed full-page text reading tasks with a low resolution, 60-pixel viewing window that was stabilized in the central visual field. Two parameters were systematically varied: (1) spatial resolution (image magnification) and (2) the orientation of the rectangular viewing window. Performance was measured in terms of reading accuracy (% of correctly read words) and reading rates (words/min). Maximum reading performances were reached at spatial resolutions between 3.6 and 6 pixels/char. Performance declined outside this range for all subjects. In optimum viewing conditions (4.5 pixels/char), subjects achieved almost perfect reading accuracy and mean reading rates of 26 words/min for the vertical viewing window and of 34 words/min for the horizontal viewing window. These results suggest that, theoretically, some reading abilities can be restored with actual state-of-the-art retinal implant prototypes if image magnification is within an optimum range. Future retinal implants providing higher pixel resolutions, thus allowing for a wider visual span might allow faster reading rates. |
topic |
Psychophysics Neuroscience Resolution Spatial Vision reading field of view |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2011.00057/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT angelicaeperezfornos readingwithasimulated60channelimplant AT jorgrudolphsommerhalder readingwithasimulated60channelimplant AT marcoepelizzone readingwithasimulated60channelimplant |
_version_ |
1725596135928627200 |