Interval-cohort designs and bias in the estimation of per-protocol effects: a simulation study
Abstract Background Randomized trials are considered the gold standard for making inferences about the causal effects of treatments. However, when protocol deviations occur, the baseline randomization of the trial is no longer sufficient to ensure unbiased estimation of the per-protocol effect: post...
Main Authors: | Jessica G. Young, Rajet Vatsa, Eleanor J. Murray, Miguel A. Hernán |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3577-z |
Similar Items
-
Per-protocol analysis of the ZINC trial for HIV disease among alcohol users
by: Sara Lodi, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Improved adherence adjustment in the Coronary Drug Project
by: Eleanor J. Murray, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Social engagement within the facility increased life expectancy in nursing home residents: a follow-up study
by: Roberto Pastor-Barriuso, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Evaluation of Large Dose, Extended Interval Aminoglycoside Dosing Protocols Using Pharmacokinetic Data from 515 Patients
by: Vu, Peter
Published: (2011) -
Interval finite element approach for inverse problems under uncertainty
by: Xiao, Naijia
Published: (2016)