Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley

Turfgrass actual evapotranspiration (ET) measurements are critical for water management and irrigation scheduling. With no historical ET measurements in eastern North Dakota, turfgrass ET rates were measured with the residual method using eddy covariance instrumentation and two arrays of soil moistu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ali Rashid Niaghi, Xinhua Jia, Thomas Scherer, Dean Steele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-06-01
Series:Vadose Zone Journal
Online Access:https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/vzj/articles/18/1/180202
id doaj-31a16b6b6b5749269fe91a94c585c229
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31a16b6b6b5749269fe91a94c585c2292020-11-25T01:19:23ZengWileyVadose Zone Journal1539-16632019-06-0118110.2136/vzj2018.11.0202Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River ValleyAli Rashid NiaghiXinhua JiaThomas SchererDean SteeleTurfgrass actual evapotranspiration (ET) measurements are critical for water management and irrigation scheduling. With no historical ET measurements in eastern North Dakota, turfgrass ET rates were measured with the residual method using eddy covariance instrumentation and two arrays of soil moisture sensors on unirrigated turfgrass under natural conditions in the 2011, 2012, and 2013 growing seasons. An on-site weather station provided weather data to calculate the standardized grass-based reference evapotranspiration (ET) (). The daily ET/ET ratios were screened using the criteria of soil moisture ≥50% of available water for the top 30 cm of the root zone, rain amounts ≤10 mm, and a recovering period after drought. The screened monthly average ET/ET ratios for the unirrigated turfgrass were 1.03, 0.98, 0.94, 0.90, 0.82, and 1.18 from May to October. The mean ET/ET ratio for the entire growing seasons was 0.96, implying that the American Society of Civil Engineering–Environmental and Water Resource Institute ET method was valid for guiding the turfgrass ET calculation even in unirrigated and cold climate conditions. Because this is the first reported study on ET measurement of a turfgrass site, the limited data can provide a baseline on water management for turfgrass under various weather conditions in this region. The results indicated that a monthly refinement of ET/ET values might be required to maintain the landscape turfgrass quality more precisely in terms of water management.https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/vzj/articles/18/1/180202
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ali Rashid Niaghi
Xinhua Jia
Thomas Scherer
Dean Steele
spellingShingle Ali Rashid Niaghi
Xinhua Jia
Thomas Scherer
Dean Steele
Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley
Vadose Zone Journal
author_facet Ali Rashid Niaghi
Xinhua Jia
Thomas Scherer
Dean Steele
author_sort Ali Rashid Niaghi
title Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley
title_short Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley
title_full Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley
title_fullStr Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley
title_full_unstemmed Measurement of Unirrigated Turfgrass Evapotranspiration Rate in the Red River Valley
title_sort measurement of unirrigated turfgrass evapotranspiration rate in the red river valley
publisher Wiley
series Vadose Zone Journal
issn 1539-1663
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Turfgrass actual evapotranspiration (ET) measurements are critical for water management and irrigation scheduling. With no historical ET measurements in eastern North Dakota, turfgrass ET rates were measured with the residual method using eddy covariance instrumentation and two arrays of soil moisture sensors on unirrigated turfgrass under natural conditions in the 2011, 2012, and 2013 growing seasons. An on-site weather station provided weather data to calculate the standardized grass-based reference evapotranspiration (ET) (). The daily ET/ET ratios were screened using the criteria of soil moisture ≥50% of available water for the top 30 cm of the root zone, rain amounts ≤10 mm, and a recovering period after drought. The screened monthly average ET/ET ratios for the unirrigated turfgrass were 1.03, 0.98, 0.94, 0.90, 0.82, and 1.18 from May to October. The mean ET/ET ratio for the entire growing seasons was 0.96, implying that the American Society of Civil Engineering–Environmental and Water Resource Institute ET method was valid for guiding the turfgrass ET calculation even in unirrigated and cold climate conditions. Because this is the first reported study on ET measurement of a turfgrass site, the limited data can provide a baseline on water management for turfgrass under various weather conditions in this region. The results indicated that a monthly refinement of ET/ET values might be required to maintain the landscape turfgrass quality more precisely in terms of water management.
url https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/vzj/articles/18/1/180202
work_keys_str_mv AT alirashidniaghi measurementofunirrigatedturfgrassevapotranspirationrateintheredrivervalley
AT xinhuajia measurementofunirrigatedturfgrassevapotranspirationrateintheredrivervalley
AT thomasscherer measurementofunirrigatedturfgrassevapotranspirationrateintheredrivervalley
AT deansteele measurementofunirrigatedturfgrassevapotranspirationrateintheredrivervalley
_version_ 1725138572644712448