Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
Within the academic field of Geography, there is an "identity crisis" facing German-language scholarship in Development Studies programs, particularly in terms of disciplinary characteristics, epistemological aims and methodological approaches. This critical self-reflection finds its expre...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-04-01
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/7/2014/gh-69-7-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-31879bbbbe6e43e68ad6a6aa781ef157 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-31879bbbbe6e43e68ad6a6aa781ef1572020-11-25T01:12:46ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982014-04-0169171810.5194/gh-69-7-2014Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“V. Deffner0C. Haferburg1Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet Kulturgeographie, RWTH Aachen University, GermanyInstitut für Geographie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, GermanyWithin the academic field of Geography, there is an "identity crisis" facing German-language scholarship in Development Studies programs, particularly in terms of disciplinary characteristics, epistemological aims and methodological approaches. This critical self-reflection finds its expression in the use of terms like "mid-range theory" or "global south", and is manifest as well in repeated calls for a re-formulation of the discipline. Simultaneously, an increasing number of empirical studies in this field are informed by readings of Bourdieu, and are relying on praxeological and corresponding relational perspectives. These studies are transcending the prevalent actor-centered paradigms. Against such a background this paper not only shows how Bourdieu's suggestions can contribute to countering conceptual and discursive dichotomies, regionalized exoticism of cultural contexts and a normative bias (especially in applied research), but also indicates directions for a reformulation or alternative interpretation of the discipline. In order to address these issues, we focus on the key concept of relationality, which is epistemologically central to understanding the "social world"; academically central for a praxeological concept of global social research; and methodologically central in terms of self-reflexivity and a heuristic approach to social categories.http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/7/2014/gh-69-7-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
V. Deffner C. Haferburg |
spellingShingle |
V. Deffner C. Haferburg Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“ Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
V. Deffner C. Haferburg |
author_sort |
V. Deffner |
title |
Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“ |
title_short |
Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“ |
title_full |
Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“ |
title_fullStr |
Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“ |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“ |
title_sort |
bourdieus theorie der praxis als alternative perspektive für die „geographische entwicklungsforschung“ |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
publishDate |
2014-04-01 |
description |
Within the academic field of Geography, there is an "identity crisis" facing
German-language scholarship in Development Studies programs, particularly in
terms of disciplinary characteristics, epistemological aims and
methodological approaches. This critical self-reflection finds its
expression in the use of terms like "mid-range theory" or "global
south", and is manifest as well in repeated calls for a re-formulation of
the discipline. Simultaneously, an increasing number of empirical studies in
this field are informed by readings of Bourdieu, and are relying on
praxeological and corresponding relational perspectives. These studies are
transcending the prevalent actor-centered paradigms. Against such a
background this paper not only shows how Bourdieu's suggestions can
contribute to countering conceptual and discursive dichotomies, regionalized
exoticism of cultural contexts and a normative bias (especially in applied
research), but also indicates directions for a reformulation or alternative
interpretation of the discipline. In order to address these issues, we focus
on the key concept of relationality, which is epistemologically central to
understanding the "social world"; academically central for a praxeological
concept of global social research; and methodologically central in terms of
self-reflexivity and a heuristic approach to social categories. |
url |
http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/7/2014/gh-69-7-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vdeffner bourdieustheoriederpraxisalsalternativeperspektivefurdiebdquogeographischeentwicklungsforschungldquo AT chaferburg bourdieustheoriederpraxisalsalternativeperspektivefurdiebdquogeographischeentwicklungsforschungldquo |
_version_ |
1725165055577686016 |