Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“

Within the academic field of Geography, there is an "identity crisis" facing German-language scholarship in Development Studies programs, particularly in terms of disciplinary characteristics, epistemological aims and methodological approaches. This critical self-reflection finds its expre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V. Deffner, C. Haferburg
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-04-01
Series:Geographica Helvetica
Online Access:http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/7/2014/gh-69-7-2014.pdf
id doaj-31879bbbbe6e43e68ad6a6aa781ef157
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31879bbbbe6e43e68ad6a6aa781ef1572020-11-25T01:12:46ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982014-04-0169171810.5194/gh-69-7-2014Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“V. Deffner0C. Haferburg1Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet Kulturgeographie, RWTH Aachen University, GermanyInstitut für Geographie, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, GermanyWithin the academic field of Geography, there is an "identity crisis" facing German-language scholarship in Development Studies programs, particularly in terms of disciplinary characteristics, epistemological aims and methodological approaches. This critical self-reflection finds its expression in the use of terms like "mid-range theory" or "global south", and is manifest as well in repeated calls for a re-formulation of the discipline. Simultaneously, an increasing number of empirical studies in this field are informed by readings of Bourdieu, and are relying on praxeological and corresponding relational perspectives. These studies are transcending the prevalent actor-centered paradigms. Against such a background this paper not only shows how Bourdieu's suggestions can contribute to countering conceptual and discursive dichotomies, regionalized exoticism of cultural contexts and a normative bias (especially in applied research), but also indicates directions for a reformulation or alternative interpretation of the discipline. In order to address these issues, we focus on the key concept of relationality, which is epistemologically central to understanding the "social world"; academically central for a praxeological concept of global social research; and methodologically central in terms of self-reflexivity and a heuristic approach to social categories.http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/7/2014/gh-69-7-2014.pdf
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. Deffner
C. Haferburg
spellingShingle V. Deffner
C. Haferburg
Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
Geographica Helvetica
author_facet V. Deffner
C. Haferburg
author_sort V. Deffner
title Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
title_short Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
title_full Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
title_fullStr Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
title_full_unstemmed Bourdieus Theorie der Praxis als alternative Perspektive für die „Geographische Entwicklungsforschung“
title_sort bourdieus theorie der praxis als alternative perspektive für die „geographische entwicklungsforschung“
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Geographica Helvetica
issn 0016-7312
2194-8798
publishDate 2014-04-01
description Within the academic field of Geography, there is an "identity crisis" facing German-language scholarship in Development Studies programs, particularly in terms of disciplinary characteristics, epistemological aims and methodological approaches. This critical self-reflection finds its expression in the use of terms like "mid-range theory" or "global south", and is manifest as well in repeated calls for a re-formulation of the discipline. Simultaneously, an increasing number of empirical studies in this field are informed by readings of Bourdieu, and are relying on praxeological and corresponding relational perspectives. These studies are transcending the prevalent actor-centered paradigms. Against such a background this paper not only shows how Bourdieu's suggestions can contribute to countering conceptual and discursive dichotomies, regionalized exoticism of cultural contexts and a normative bias (especially in applied research), but also indicates directions for a reformulation or alternative interpretation of the discipline. In order to address these issues, we focus on the key concept of relationality, which is epistemologically central to understanding the "social world"; academically central for a praxeological concept of global social research; and methodologically central in terms of self-reflexivity and a heuristic approach to social categories.
url http://www.geogr-helv.net/69/7/2014/gh-69-7-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vdeffner bourdieustheoriederpraxisalsalternativeperspektivefurdiebdquogeographischeentwicklungsforschungldquo
AT chaferburg bourdieustheoriederpraxisalsalternativeperspektivefurdiebdquogeographischeentwicklungsforschungldquo
_version_ 1725165055577686016