Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome

The objective of this study was to compare the risk factors and outcome of patients with preexisting resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) with those who develop sensitive GNB in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). Of the 3161 patients (<i> n</i> = 3,161) admitted to the ICU during t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pawar Mandakini, Mehta Yatin, Purohit Apoorva, Trehan Naresh, Daniel Rosenthal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2008-01-01
Series:Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.annals.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9784;year=2008;volume=11;issue=1;spage=20;epage=26;aulast=Pawar
id doaj-3184f72733e444f69fa5cbf53d1ad156
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3184f72733e444f69fa5cbf53d1ad1562020-11-25T00:09:39ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAnnals of Cardiac Anaesthesia0971-97842008-01-011112026Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcomePawar MandakiniMehta YatinPurohit ApoorvaTrehan NareshDaniel RosenthalThe objective of this study was to compare the risk factors and outcome of patients with preexisting resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) with those who develop sensitive GNB in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). Of the 3161 patients (<i> n</i> = 3,161) admitted to the ICU during the study period, 130 (4.11&#x0025;) developed health care-associated infections (HAIs) with GNB and were included in the cohort study. <i> Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (37.8&#x0025;) was the most common organism isolated followed by Klebsiella species (24.2&#x0025;), <i> E. coli</i> (22.0&#x0025;), Enterobacter species (6.1&#x0025;), <i> Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> (5.7&#x0025;), Acinetobacter species (1.3&#x0025;), <i> Serratia marcescens</i> (0.8&#x0025;), <i> Weeksella virosa</i> (0.4&#x0025;) and <i> Burkholderia cepacia</i> (0.4&#x0025;). Univariate analysis revealed that the following variables were significantly associated with the antibiotic-resistant GNB: females (<i> P</i> = 0.018), re-exploration (<i> P</i> = 0.004), valve surgery (<i> P</i> = 0.003), duration of central venous catheter (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), duration of mechanical ventilation (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), duration of intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation (<i> P</i> = 0.018), duration of urinary catheter (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), total number of antibiotic exposures prior to the development of resistance (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), duration of antibiotic use prior to the development of resistance (<i> P</i> = 0.014), acute physiology and age chronic health evaluation score (APACHE II), receipt of anti-pseudomonal penicillins (piperacillin-tazobactam) (<i> P </i> = 0.002) and carbapenems (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001). On multivariate analysis, valve surgery (adjusted OR = 2.033; 95&#x0025; CI = 1.052-3.928; <i> P</i> = 0.035), duration of mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR = 1.265; 95&#x0025; CI = 1.055-1.517; <i> P</i> = 0.011) and total number of antibiotic exposure prior to the development of resistance (adjusted OR = 1.381; 95&#x0025; CI = 1.030-1.853; <i> P</i> = 0.031) were identified as independent risk factors for HAIs in resistant GNB. The mortality rate in patients with resistant GNB was significantly higher than those with sensitive GNB (13.9&#x0025; vs. 1.8&#x0025;; <i> P</i> = 0.03). HAI with resistant GNB, in ICU following cardiac surgery, are independently associated with the following variables: valve surgeries, duration of mechanical ventilation and prior exposure to antibiotics. The mortality rate is significantly higher among patients with resistant GNB. http://www.annals.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9784;year=2008;volume=11;issue=1;spage=20;epage=26;aulast=PawarCardiac surgerygram-negative bacilliintensive care unitnosocomial infectionresistance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pawar Mandakini
Mehta Yatin
Purohit Apoorva
Trehan Naresh
Daniel Rosenthal
spellingShingle Pawar Mandakini
Mehta Yatin
Purohit Apoorva
Trehan Naresh
Daniel Rosenthal
Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
Cardiac surgery
gram-negative bacilli
intensive care unit
nosocomial infection
resistance
author_facet Pawar Mandakini
Mehta Yatin
Purohit Apoorva
Trehan Naresh
Daniel Rosenthal
author_sort Pawar Mandakini
title Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome
title_short Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome
title_full Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome
title_fullStr Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome
title_full_unstemmed Resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in India: Risk factors and outcome
title_sort resistance in gram-negative bacilli in a cardiac intensive care unit in india: risk factors and outcome
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia
issn 0971-9784
publishDate 2008-01-01
description The objective of this study was to compare the risk factors and outcome of patients with preexisting resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) with those who develop sensitive GNB in the cardiac intensive care unit (ICU). Of the 3161 patients (<i> n</i> = 3,161) admitted to the ICU during the study period, 130 (4.11&#x0025;) developed health care-associated infections (HAIs) with GNB and were included in the cohort study. <i> Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (37.8&#x0025;) was the most common organism isolated followed by Klebsiella species (24.2&#x0025;), <i> E. coli</i> (22.0&#x0025;), Enterobacter species (6.1&#x0025;), <i> Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> (5.7&#x0025;), Acinetobacter species (1.3&#x0025;), <i> Serratia marcescens</i> (0.8&#x0025;), <i> Weeksella virosa</i> (0.4&#x0025;) and <i> Burkholderia cepacia</i> (0.4&#x0025;). Univariate analysis revealed that the following variables were significantly associated with the antibiotic-resistant GNB: females (<i> P</i> = 0.018), re-exploration (<i> P</i> = 0.004), valve surgery (<i> P</i> = 0.003), duration of central venous catheter (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), duration of mechanical ventilation (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), duration of intra-aortic balloon counter-pulsation (<i> P</i> = 0.018), duration of urinary catheter (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), total number of antibiotic exposures prior to the development of resistance (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001), duration of antibiotic use prior to the development of resistance (<i> P</i> = 0.014), acute physiology and age chronic health evaluation score (APACHE II), receipt of anti-pseudomonal penicillins (piperacillin-tazobactam) (<i> P </i> = 0.002) and carbapenems (<i> P</i> &lt; 0.001). On multivariate analysis, valve surgery (adjusted OR = 2.033; 95&#x0025; CI = 1.052-3.928; <i> P</i> = 0.035), duration of mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR = 1.265; 95&#x0025; CI = 1.055-1.517; <i> P</i> = 0.011) and total number of antibiotic exposure prior to the development of resistance (adjusted OR = 1.381; 95&#x0025; CI = 1.030-1.853; <i> P</i> = 0.031) were identified as independent risk factors for HAIs in resistant GNB. The mortality rate in patients with resistant GNB was significantly higher than those with sensitive GNB (13.9&#x0025; vs. 1.8&#x0025;; <i> P</i> = 0.03). HAI with resistant GNB, in ICU following cardiac surgery, are independently associated with the following variables: valve surgeries, duration of mechanical ventilation and prior exposure to antibiotics. The mortality rate is significantly higher among patients with resistant GNB.
topic Cardiac surgery
gram-negative bacilli
intensive care unit
nosocomial infection
resistance
url http://www.annals.in/article.asp?issn=0971-9784;year=2008;volume=11;issue=1;spage=20;epage=26;aulast=Pawar
work_keys_str_mv AT pawarmandakini resistanceingramnegativebacilliinacardiacintensivecareunitinindiariskfactorsandoutcome
AT mehtayatin resistanceingramnegativebacilliinacardiacintensivecareunitinindiariskfactorsandoutcome
AT purohitapoorva resistanceingramnegativebacilliinacardiacintensivecareunitinindiariskfactorsandoutcome
AT trehannaresh resistanceingramnegativebacilliinacardiacintensivecareunitinindiariskfactorsandoutcome
AT danielrosenthal resistanceingramnegativebacilliinacardiacintensivecareunitinindiariskfactorsandoutcome
_version_ 1725410741827141632