The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences

Coastal eutrophication caused by anthropogenic nutrient inputs is one of the greatest threats to the health of coastal estuarine and marine ecosystems worldwide. Globally, ∼24% of the anthropogenic N released in coastal watersheds is estimated to reach coastal ecosystems. Seven contrasting coastal e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas C. Malone, Alice Newton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00670/full
id doaj-317f78c8dc51491687932c6fd7ab748e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-317f78c8dc51491687932c6fd7ab748e2020-11-25T03:46:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452020-08-01710.3389/fmars.2020.00670558977The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and ConsequencesThomas C. Malone0Alice Newton1Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD, United StatesMarine Environmental Research Center, University of Algarve, Faro, PortugalCoastal eutrophication caused by anthropogenic nutrient inputs is one of the greatest threats to the health of coastal estuarine and marine ecosystems worldwide. Globally, ∼24% of the anthropogenic N released in coastal watersheds is estimated to reach coastal ecosystems. Seven contrasting coastal ecosystems subject to a range of riverine inputs of freshwater and nutrients are compared to better understand and manage this threat. The following are addressed: (i) impacts of anthropogenic nutrient inputs on ecosystem services; (ii) how ecosystem traits minimize or amplify these impacts; (iii) synergies among pressures (nutrient enrichment, over fishing, coastal development, and climate-driven pressures in particular); and (iv) management of nutrient inputs to coastal ecosystems. This comparative analysis shows that “trophic status,” when defined in terms of the level of primary production, is not useful for relating anthropogenic nutrient loading to impacts. Ranked in terms of the impact of cultural eutrophication, Chesapeake Bay ranks number one followed by the Baltic Sea, Northern Adriatic Sea, Northern Gulf of Mexico, Santa Barbara Channel, East China Sea, and the Great Barrier Reef. The impacts of increases in anthropogenic nutrient loading (e.g., development of “dead zones,” loss of biologically engineered habitats, and toxic phytoplankton events) are, and will continue to be, exacerbated by synergies with other pressures, including over fishing, coastal development and climate-driven increases in sea surface temperature, acidification and rainfall. With respect to management, reductions in point source inputs from sewage treatment plants are increasingly successful. However, controlling inputs from diffuse sources remains a challenging problem. The conclusion from this analysis is that the severity of coastal eutrophication will likely continue to increase in the absence of effectively enforced, ecosystem-based management of both point and diffuse sources of nitrogen and phosphorus. This requires sustained, integrated research and monitoring, as well as repeated assessments of nutrient loading and impacts. These must be informed and guided by ongoing collaborations among scientists, politicians, managers and the public.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00670/fullnutrientspollutioneutrophicationserviceshypoxiabiodiversity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas C. Malone
Alice Newton
spellingShingle Thomas C. Malone
Alice Newton
The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences
Frontiers in Marine Science
nutrients
pollution
eutrophication
services
hypoxia
biodiversity
author_facet Thomas C. Malone
Alice Newton
author_sort Thomas C. Malone
title The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences
title_short The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences
title_full The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences
title_fullStr The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences
title_full_unstemmed The Globalization of Cultural Eutrophication in the Coastal Ocean: Causes and Consequences
title_sort globalization of cultural eutrophication in the coastal ocean: causes and consequences
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Marine Science
issn 2296-7745
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Coastal eutrophication caused by anthropogenic nutrient inputs is one of the greatest threats to the health of coastal estuarine and marine ecosystems worldwide. Globally, ∼24% of the anthropogenic N released in coastal watersheds is estimated to reach coastal ecosystems. Seven contrasting coastal ecosystems subject to a range of riverine inputs of freshwater and nutrients are compared to better understand and manage this threat. The following are addressed: (i) impacts of anthropogenic nutrient inputs on ecosystem services; (ii) how ecosystem traits minimize or amplify these impacts; (iii) synergies among pressures (nutrient enrichment, over fishing, coastal development, and climate-driven pressures in particular); and (iv) management of nutrient inputs to coastal ecosystems. This comparative analysis shows that “trophic status,” when defined in terms of the level of primary production, is not useful for relating anthropogenic nutrient loading to impacts. Ranked in terms of the impact of cultural eutrophication, Chesapeake Bay ranks number one followed by the Baltic Sea, Northern Adriatic Sea, Northern Gulf of Mexico, Santa Barbara Channel, East China Sea, and the Great Barrier Reef. The impacts of increases in anthropogenic nutrient loading (e.g., development of “dead zones,” loss of biologically engineered habitats, and toxic phytoplankton events) are, and will continue to be, exacerbated by synergies with other pressures, including over fishing, coastal development and climate-driven increases in sea surface temperature, acidification and rainfall. With respect to management, reductions in point source inputs from sewage treatment plants are increasingly successful. However, controlling inputs from diffuse sources remains a challenging problem. The conclusion from this analysis is that the severity of coastal eutrophication will likely continue to increase in the absence of effectively enforced, ecosystem-based management of both point and diffuse sources of nitrogen and phosphorus. This requires sustained, integrated research and monitoring, as well as repeated assessments of nutrient loading and impacts. These must be informed and guided by ongoing collaborations among scientists, politicians, managers and the public.
topic nutrients
pollution
eutrophication
services
hypoxia
biodiversity
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.00670/full
work_keys_str_mv AT thomascmalone theglobalizationofculturaleutrophicationinthecoastaloceancausesandconsequences
AT alicenewton theglobalizationofculturaleutrophicationinthecoastaloceancausesandconsequences
AT thomascmalone globalizationofculturaleutrophicationinthecoastaloceancausesandconsequences
AT alicenewton globalizationofculturaleutrophicationinthecoastaloceancausesandconsequences
_version_ 1724508384438255616