Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala

India has a history of displacing people for ‘development’; its genesis can be traced to the colonial administration. The 1894 Land Acquisition Act proves how State and bureaucracy define the rights of the people displaced. The ideas of development always triumph over displacement, and both parliame...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. Mohammed Irshad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Globus et Locus 2019-05-01
Series:Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://glocalismjournal.org/anti-displacement-movement-and-development-democracy-a-study-on-keezhattur-protest-in-kerala/#1548758827668-1751df6d-4b54
id doaj-317daba1b5bd482ebb20fbef67d22c6e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-317daba1b5bd482ebb20fbef67d22c6e2020-11-25T01:17:56ZengGlobus et LocusGlocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation2283-79492283-79492019-05-012019110.12893/gjcpi.2019.1.9Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in KeralaS. Mohammed IrshadIndia has a history of displacing people for ‘development’; its genesis can be traced to the colonial administration. The 1894 Land Acquisition Act proves how State and bureaucracy define the rights of the people displaced. The ideas of development always triumph over displacement, and both parliamentary discourse and State establishments are positioned in favour of development. Hence, an anti-displacement perspective is considered anti-development as well as anti-State. There are local-centric movements to oppose displacement which are mainly criticized for not taking into account the development interest at large. However, being local-centric is a strength of these movements as it accommodates grass root democracy. This paper discusses the issue of development democracy in the context of the local protest in Keezhattur, Kerala. It is a locally grounded movement against the land acquisition for a highway project. The government is for the project while the opposition parties are against it simply by virtue of being in the opposition. No political party in Kerala genuinely opposes the project. The movements are treated as against the development. The oppositional pol- itics is local while the project is national. The people of Kerala do not have a reason to be with the protestors since the project is for a highway connecting the State with national mainland.https://glocalismjournal.org/anti-displacement-movement-and-development-democracy-a-study-on-keezhattur-protest-in-kerala/#1548758827668-1751df6d-4b54VayalkilikalKeezhatturdevelopmentresistancedisplacement
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Mohammed Irshad
spellingShingle S. Mohammed Irshad
Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala
Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation
Vayalkilikal
Keezhattur
development
resistance
displacement
author_facet S. Mohammed Irshad
author_sort S. Mohammed Irshad
title Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala
title_short Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala
title_full Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala
title_fullStr Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala
title_full_unstemmed Anti-Displacement Movement and Development Democracy: a Study on Keezhattur Protest in Kerala
title_sort anti-displacement movement and development democracy: a study on keezhattur protest in kerala
publisher Globus et Locus
series Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation
issn 2283-7949
2283-7949
publishDate 2019-05-01
description India has a history of displacing people for ‘development’; its genesis can be traced to the colonial administration. The 1894 Land Acquisition Act proves how State and bureaucracy define the rights of the people displaced. The ideas of development always triumph over displacement, and both parliamentary discourse and State establishments are positioned in favour of development. Hence, an anti-displacement perspective is considered anti-development as well as anti-State. There are local-centric movements to oppose displacement which are mainly criticized for not taking into account the development interest at large. However, being local-centric is a strength of these movements as it accommodates grass root democracy. This paper discusses the issue of development democracy in the context of the local protest in Keezhattur, Kerala. It is a locally grounded movement against the land acquisition for a highway project. The government is for the project while the opposition parties are against it simply by virtue of being in the opposition. No political party in Kerala genuinely opposes the project. The movements are treated as against the development. The oppositional pol- itics is local while the project is national. The people of Kerala do not have a reason to be with the protestors since the project is for a highway connecting the State with national mainland.
topic Vayalkilikal
Keezhattur
development
resistance
displacement
url https://glocalismjournal.org/anti-displacement-movement-and-development-democracy-a-study-on-keezhattur-protest-in-kerala/#1548758827668-1751df6d-4b54
work_keys_str_mv AT smohammedirshad antidisplacementmovementanddevelopmentdemocracyastudyonkeezhatturprotestinkerala
_version_ 1725144880050601984