Predictive and prognostic value of EPIC1 in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Background: EPIC1 is an oncogenic long non-coding ribonucleic acid (RNA) that promotes cell growth and cell-cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. However, clinical studies on EPIC1 in breast cancer, specifically in the neoadjuvant setting, are relatively few. Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yaqian Xu, Yan Wang, Chenwei Yuan, Xiaonan Sheng, Rui Sha, Huijuan Dai, Shan Zhang, Yaohui Wang, Yanping Lin, Liheng Zhou, Shuguang Xu, Jie Zhang, Wenjin Yin, Jinsong Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-07-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835920940886
Description
Summary:Background: EPIC1 is an oncogenic long non-coding ribonucleic acid (RNA) that promotes cell growth and cell-cycle progression and inhibits apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. However, clinical studies on EPIC1 in breast cancer, specifically in the neoadjuvant setting, are relatively few. Methods: Patients treated with weekly paclitaxel–cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy after core-needle biopsy were included in the study. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays were performed to detect EPIC1 expression. Results: Among all patients included in this study ( n  = 111), higher EPIC1 expression was associated with estrogen receptor negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity, higher Ki67 index, and higher histologic grade. Multivariate analysis suggested that EPIC1 expression was an independent predictive factor for pathological complete response, with a significant interaction between EPIC1 expression and age. The Kaplan–Meier Plotter dataset suggested that the EPIC1 high-expression group showed a worse 10-year distant metastasis-free survival and post-progression survival when compared with the EPIC1 low-expression group. The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset suggested that the overall survival in the EPIC1 high-expression group was inferior to that in the EPIC1 low-expression group, specifically in hormone receptor (HorR)-positive patients and patients aged <50 years. Pathway analysis revealed the top pathways that indicated the potential mechanisms of EPIC1 in chemoresistance, including the daunorubicin and doxorubicin metabolic processes. Conclusions: Our study suggests that EPIC1 may be a promising biomarker for both neoadjuvant chemosensitivity and long-term clinical outcomes in breast cancer, specifically in the HorR-positive premenopausal subgroup. It may also help identify candidate responders and determine treatment strategies.
ISSN:1758-8359