The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China

This research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang, Yordan Gunawan, Rizaldy Anggriawan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sriwijaya University 2021-07-01
Series:Sriwijaya Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/875
id doaj-3170bb50873e4c41ba2caf6a63c4959b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3170bb50873e4c41ba2caf6a63c4959b2021-08-02T00:16:33ZengSriwijaya UniversitySriwijaya Law Review2541-52982541-64642021-07-015220521710.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.875.pp205-217368The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and ChinaMohammad Hazyar Arumbinang0Yordan Gunawan1Rizaldy Anggriawan2The University of Melbourne, AustraliaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, IndonesiaDepartment of Financial and Economic Law, Asia University TaiwanThis research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using de-scriptive-analytical analysis. This paper reveals that there are two legal is-sues in the fishing rights conflict between Vietnam and China. First is the legality of the Nine-dashed Line by China to claim the disputed water. Sec-ond, the legality of unilateral fishing ban policy by China over the disputed water, which both has no legality under international law. Although China claims over SCS using Nine-dashed Line and unilateral fishing ban policy under international law has no legal basis, the dispute over SCS including fishing rights continued until today. The solutions offered to solve these problems include a resolution on SCS dispute must be made legally and di-plomacy to build confidence-building measures. Ideally, both states should honour the accepted negotiation steps to agree upon compensation for the effects of the disputes and be sincere and earnest in their attempts and com-mitment to resolving their dispute.http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/875fishing rightsinternational lawnine-dashed linesouth china sea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
Yordan Gunawan
Rizaldy Anggriawan
spellingShingle Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
Yordan Gunawan
Rizaldy Anggriawan
The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
Sriwijaya Law Review
fishing rights
international law
nine-dashed line
south china sea
author_facet Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
Yordan Gunawan
Rizaldy Anggriawan
author_sort Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang
title The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
title_short The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
title_full The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
title_fullStr The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
title_full_unstemmed The Fishing Rights Conflict in the South China Sea between Vietnam and China
title_sort fishing rights conflict in the south china sea between vietnam and china
publisher Sriwijaya University
series Sriwijaya Law Review
issn 2541-5298
2541-6464
publishDate 2021-07-01
description This research aims to understand and clarify the international legal perspec-tive relating to the current dispute and how they are resolved according to international law between Vietnam and China over fishing rights in the South China Sea. This paper has adopted a normative legal research with a statutory and historical approaches. The data will be analysed by using de-scriptive-analytical analysis. This paper reveals that there are two legal is-sues in the fishing rights conflict between Vietnam and China. First is the legality of the Nine-dashed Line by China to claim the disputed water. Sec-ond, the legality of unilateral fishing ban policy by China over the disputed water, which both has no legality under international law. Although China claims over SCS using Nine-dashed Line and unilateral fishing ban policy under international law has no legal basis, the dispute over SCS including fishing rights continued until today. The solutions offered to solve these problems include a resolution on SCS dispute must be made legally and di-plomacy to build confidence-building measures. Ideally, both states should honour the accepted negotiation steps to agree upon compensation for the effects of the disputes and be sincere and earnest in their attempts and com-mitment to resolving their dispute.
topic fishing rights
international law
nine-dashed line
south china sea
url http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/875
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadhazyararumbinang thefishingrightsconflictinthesouthchinaseabetweenvietnamandchina
AT yordangunawan thefishingrightsconflictinthesouthchinaseabetweenvietnamandchina
AT rizaldyanggriawan thefishingrightsconflictinthesouthchinaseabetweenvietnamandchina
AT mohammadhazyararumbinang fishingrightsconflictinthesouthchinaseabetweenvietnamandchina
AT yordangunawan fishingrightsconflictinthesouthchinaseabetweenvietnamandchina
AT rizaldyanggriawan fishingrightsconflictinthesouthchinaseabetweenvietnamandchina
_version_ 1721245225345613824