Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain

The territorialization of the Western Ghats, India, is an act of colonial power either by settled or marginalized particular peoples, practices, and ecologies, privileging a wet-dry binary and spatializing a monsoon landscape. The environment of the Western Ghats, in particular, has been politicized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Deepta Stateesh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Los Andes 2019-09-01
Series:Dearq
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.18389/dearq26.2020.02
id doaj-31629b9b18d24e5c8e4d734c3b9a8500
record_format Article
spelling doaj-31629b9b18d24e5c8e4d734c3b9a85002020-12-02T07:05:16ZengUniversidad de Los AndesDearq2011-31882215-969X2019-09-01341627https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq26.2020.02Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon TerrainDeepta Stateeshhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-4740The territorialization of the Western Ghats, India, is an act of colonial power either by settled or marginalized particular peoples, practices, and ecologies, privileging a wet-dry binary and spatializing a monsoon landscape. The environment of the Western Ghats, in particular, has been politicized and polarized. Today, indigenous peoples and other ‘forest dwellers’ have been compromised through the inherited colonial framework; they are excluded by conservation action as is their knowledge that is based on dynamic everyday relationships with place. Efforts to be inclusive are fraught with inadequacies of colonial imaging and use the language that continue to objectify and spatialize nature and culture, which, in turn, propagates the wet-dry divide. The disciplining of the Western Ghats is perpetuated through environmental laws: from the Indian Forest Act, 1865, guarding the land for production, to the Forest Rights Act, 2006, which gives rights to forest dwellers to protect it. Despite these laws, conflicts over access to land and resources continue as the lives of these inhabitants and their relationship with the ground, or world, were never considered on their own terms. How can design unravel how these inhabitants lived prior to colonialism? There is the possibility that they understand place by moving, occupying, and temporally appropriating dynamic conditions of ‘wetness’ in their ordinary everyday lives. What can be assembled from existing clues, and from a new imagination, to design futures that correspond (Ingold 2011) to a changing environment? This paper will reveal the possibility of a local/indigenous ‘wet ontology’ (Steinberg and Peters 2015) which privileges everyday practices across time and continually ‘makes home’ in this monsoon terrain.https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.18389/dearq26.2020.02colonialismwestern ghatsenvironmentalismdesign researchimagination
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Deepta Stateesh
spellingShingle Deepta Stateesh
Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain
Dearq
colonialism
western ghats
environmentalism
design research
imagination
author_facet Deepta Stateesh
author_sort Deepta Stateesh
title Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain
title_short Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain
title_full Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain
title_fullStr Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain
title_full_unstemmed Movement and Place-making in a Monsoon Terrain
title_sort movement and place-making in a monsoon terrain
publisher Universidad de Los Andes
series Dearq
issn 2011-3188
2215-969X
publishDate 2019-09-01
description The territorialization of the Western Ghats, India, is an act of colonial power either by settled or marginalized particular peoples, practices, and ecologies, privileging a wet-dry binary and spatializing a monsoon landscape. The environment of the Western Ghats, in particular, has been politicized and polarized. Today, indigenous peoples and other ‘forest dwellers’ have been compromised through the inherited colonial framework; they are excluded by conservation action as is their knowledge that is based on dynamic everyday relationships with place. Efforts to be inclusive are fraught with inadequacies of colonial imaging and use the language that continue to objectify and spatialize nature and culture, which, in turn, propagates the wet-dry divide. The disciplining of the Western Ghats is perpetuated through environmental laws: from the Indian Forest Act, 1865, guarding the land for production, to the Forest Rights Act, 2006, which gives rights to forest dwellers to protect it. Despite these laws, conflicts over access to land and resources continue as the lives of these inhabitants and their relationship with the ground, or world, were never considered on their own terms. How can design unravel how these inhabitants lived prior to colonialism? There is the possibility that they understand place by moving, occupying, and temporally appropriating dynamic conditions of ‘wetness’ in their ordinary everyday lives. What can be assembled from existing clues, and from a new imagination, to design futures that correspond (Ingold 2011) to a changing environment? This paper will reveal the possibility of a local/indigenous ‘wet ontology’ (Steinberg and Peters 2015) which privileges everyday practices across time and continually ‘makes home’ in this monsoon terrain.
topic colonialism
western ghats
environmentalism
design research
imagination
url https://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.18389/dearq26.2020.02
work_keys_str_mv AT deeptastateesh movementandplacemakinginamonsoonterrain
_version_ 1724408357822922752