A meta‐analysis and cost‐minimization analysis of bivalirudin versus heparin in high‐risk patients for percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract This meta‐analysis was performed to compare the safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomic of bivalirudin versus heparin in high‐risk patients for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Earlier meta‐analysis comparing bivalirudin and heparin during PCI demonstrated that bivalirudin caused l...
Main Authors: | Ke‐Xin Sun, Bin Cui, Shan‐Shan Cao, Wen‐Jun Wang, Feng Yu, Jing‐Wen Wang, Yi Ding |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Pharmacology Research & Perspectives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.774 |
Similar Items
-
Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary bifurcation lesions
by: XIANG Chaojun, et al.
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention in high-bleeding-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome in contemporary practice
by: Yahao Zhang, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Comparison of anti-thrombotic strategies using Bivalirudin, Heparin plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and Unfractionated Heparin Monotherapy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention – A single centre observational study
by: Upendra Kaul, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Safety of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin
in endovascular revascularization of peripheral arteries
in short- and long-term follow-up
by: Joanna Wojtasik-Bakalarz, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Effects of Heparin and Bivalirudin on Thrombin-Induced Platelet Activation: Differential Modulation of PAR Signaling Drives Divergent Prothrombotic Responses
by: Mikael Lund, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)