Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?

Objective: On-going evidence is required to support the validity of inferences about change and group differences in the evaluation of health programs, particularly when self-report scales requiring substantial subjectivity in response generation are used as outcome measures. Following this reasonin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerald R Elsworth, Sandra Nolte, Richard H Osborne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2015-05-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312115585041
id doaj-311de5c8eb6f45b3aea90e145c6d50c2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-311de5c8eb6f45b3aea90e145c6d50c22020-11-25T03:00:31ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212015-05-01310.1177/205031211558504110.1177_2050312115585041Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?Gerald R Elsworth0Sandra Nolte1Richard H Osborne2Public Health Innovation, Population Health Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaMedical Clinic, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyPublic Health Innovation, Population Health Strategic Research Centre, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, AustraliaObjective: On-going evidence is required to support the validity of inferences about change and group differences in the evaluation of health programs, particularly when self-report scales requiring substantial subjectivity in response generation are used as outcome measures. Following this reasoning, the aim of this study was to replicate the factor structure and investigate the measurement invariance of the latest version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, a widely used health program evaluation measure. Methods: An archived dataset of responses to the most recent version of the English-language Health Education Impact Questionnaire that uses four rather than six response options (N = 3221) was analysed using exploratory structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis appropriate for ordered categorical data. Metric and scalar invariance were studied following recent recommendations in the literature to apply fully invariant unconditional models with minimum constraints necessary for model identification. Results: The original eight-factor structure was replicated and all but one of the scales (Self Monitoring and Insight) was found to consist of unifactorial items with reliability of ⩾0.8 and satisfactory discriminant validity. Configural, metric and scalar invariance were established across pre-test to post-test and population sub-groups (sex, age, education, ethnic background). Conclusion: The results support the high level of interest in the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, particularly for use as a pre-test/post-test measure in experimental studies, other pre–post evaluation designs and system-level monitoring and evaluation.https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312115585041
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerald R Elsworth
Sandra Nolte
Richard H Osborne
spellingShingle Gerald R Elsworth
Sandra Nolte
Richard H Osborne
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Gerald R Elsworth
Sandra Nolte
Richard H Osborne
author_sort Gerald R Elsworth
title Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
title_short Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
title_full Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
title_fullStr Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
title_full_unstemmed Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
title_sort factor structure and measurement invariance of the health education impact questionnaire: does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2015-05-01
description Objective: On-going evidence is required to support the validity of inferences about change and group differences in the evaluation of health programs, particularly when self-report scales requiring substantial subjectivity in response generation are used as outcome measures. Following this reasoning, the aim of this study was to replicate the factor structure and investigate the measurement invariance of the latest version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, a widely used health program evaluation measure. Methods: An archived dataset of responses to the most recent version of the English-language Health Education Impact Questionnaire that uses four rather than six response options (N = 3221) was analysed using exploratory structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis appropriate for ordered categorical data. Metric and scalar invariance were studied following recent recommendations in the literature to apply fully invariant unconditional models with minimum constraints necessary for model identification. Results: The original eight-factor structure was replicated and all but one of the scales (Self Monitoring and Insight) was found to consist of unifactorial items with reliability of ⩾0.8 and satisfactory discriminant validity. Configural, metric and scalar invariance were established across pre-test to post-test and population sub-groups (sex, age, education, ethnic background). Conclusion: The results support the high level of interest in the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, particularly for use as a pre-test/post-test measure in experimental studies, other pre–post evaluation designs and system-level monitoring and evaluation.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312115585041
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldrelsworth factorstructureandmeasurementinvarianceofthehealtheducationimpactquestionnairedoesthesubjectivityoftheresponseperspectivethreatenthecontextualvalidityofinferences
AT sandranolte factorstructureandmeasurementinvarianceofthehealtheducationimpactquestionnairedoesthesubjectivityoftheresponseperspectivethreatenthecontextualvalidityofinferences
AT richardhosborne factorstructureandmeasurementinvarianceofthehealtheducationimpactquestionnairedoesthesubjectivityoftheresponseperspectivethreatenthecontextualvalidityofinferences
_version_ 1724697640170422272