Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.

BACKGROUND: In terms of time, effort and quality, multiplex technology is an attractive alternative for well-established single-biomarker measurements in clinical studies. However, limited data comparing these methods are available. METHODS: We measured, in a large ongoing cohort study (n = 574), by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bas C T van Bussel, Isabel Ferreira, Marjo P H van de Waarenburg, Marleen M J van Greevenbroek, Carla J H van der Kallen, Ronald M A Henry, Edith J M Feskens, Coen D A Stehouwer, Casper G Schalkwijk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3589355?pdf=render
id doaj-3116915614c34f39b2699972240e64c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3116915614c34f39b2699972240e64c32020-11-25T02:42:37ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0183e5857610.1371/journal.pone.0058576Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.Bas C T van BusselIsabel FerreiraMarjo P H van de WaarenburgMarleen M J van GreevenbroekCarla J H van der KallenRonald M A HenryEdith J M FeskensCoen D A StehouwerCasper G SchalkwijkBACKGROUND: In terms of time, effort and quality, multiplex technology is an attractive alternative for well-established single-biomarker measurements in clinical studies. However, limited data comparing these methods are available. METHODS: We measured, in a large ongoing cohort study (n = 574), by means of both a 4-plex multi-array biomarker assay developed by MesoScaleDiscovery (MSD) and single-biomarker techniques (ELISA or immunoturbidimetric assay), the following biomarkers of low-grade inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1). These measures were realigned by weighted Deming regression and compared across a wide spectrum of subjects' cardiovascular risk factors by ANOVA. RESULTS: Despite that both methods ranked individuals' levels of biomarkers very similarly (Pearson's r all≥0.755) absolute concentrations of all biomarkers differed significantly between methods. Equations retrieved by the Deming regression enabled proper realignment of the data to overcome these differences, such that intra-class correlation coefficients were then 0.996 (CRP), 0.711 (SAA), 0.895 (sICAM-1) and 0.858 (sVCAM-1). Additionally, individual biomarkers differed across categories of glucose metabolism, weight, metabolic syndrome and smoking status to a similar extent by either method. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple low-grade inflammatory biomarker data obtained by the 4-plex multi-array platform of MSD or by well-established single-biomarker methods are comparable after proper realignment of differences in absolute concentrations, and are equally associated with cardiovascular risk factors, regardless of such differences. Given its greater efficiency, the MSD platform is a potential tool for the quantification of multiple biomarkers of low-grade inflammation in large ongoing and future clinical studies.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3589355?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bas C T van Bussel
Isabel Ferreira
Marjo P H van de Waarenburg
Marleen M J van Greevenbroek
Carla J H van der Kallen
Ronald M A Henry
Edith J M Feskens
Coen D A Stehouwer
Casper G Schalkwijk
spellingShingle Bas C T van Bussel
Isabel Ferreira
Marjo P H van de Waarenburg
Marleen M J van Greevenbroek
Carla J H van der Kallen
Ronald M A Henry
Edith J M Feskens
Coen D A Stehouwer
Casper G Schalkwijk
Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Bas C T van Bussel
Isabel Ferreira
Marjo P H van de Waarenburg
Marleen M J van Greevenbroek
Carla J H van der Kallen
Ronald M A Henry
Edith J M Feskens
Coen D A Stehouwer
Casper G Schalkwijk
author_sort Bas C T van Bussel
title Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
title_short Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
title_full Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
title_fullStr Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
title_full_unstemmed Multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
title_sort multiple inflammatory biomarker detection in a prospective cohort study: a cross-validation between well-established single-biomarker techniques and an electrochemiluminescense-based multi-array platform.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description BACKGROUND: In terms of time, effort and quality, multiplex technology is an attractive alternative for well-established single-biomarker measurements in clinical studies. However, limited data comparing these methods are available. METHODS: We measured, in a large ongoing cohort study (n = 574), by means of both a 4-plex multi-array biomarker assay developed by MesoScaleDiscovery (MSD) and single-biomarker techniques (ELISA or immunoturbidimetric assay), the following biomarkers of low-grade inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (sVCAM-1). These measures were realigned by weighted Deming regression and compared across a wide spectrum of subjects' cardiovascular risk factors by ANOVA. RESULTS: Despite that both methods ranked individuals' levels of biomarkers very similarly (Pearson's r all≥0.755) absolute concentrations of all biomarkers differed significantly between methods. Equations retrieved by the Deming regression enabled proper realignment of the data to overcome these differences, such that intra-class correlation coefficients were then 0.996 (CRP), 0.711 (SAA), 0.895 (sICAM-1) and 0.858 (sVCAM-1). Additionally, individual biomarkers differed across categories of glucose metabolism, weight, metabolic syndrome and smoking status to a similar extent by either method. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple low-grade inflammatory biomarker data obtained by the 4-plex multi-array platform of MSD or by well-established single-biomarker methods are comparable after proper realignment of differences in absolute concentrations, and are equally associated with cardiovascular risk factors, regardless of such differences. Given its greater efficiency, the MSD platform is a potential tool for the quantification of multiple biomarkers of low-grade inflammation in large ongoing and future clinical studies.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3589355?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT basctvanbussel multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT isabelferreira multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT marjophvandewaarenburg multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT marleenmjvangreevenbroek multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT carlajhvanderkallen multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT ronaldmahenry multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT edithjmfeskens multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT coendastehouwer multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
AT caspergschalkwijk multipleinflammatorybiomarkerdetectioninaprospectivecohortstudyacrossvalidationbetweenwellestablishedsinglebiomarkertechniquesandanelectrochemiluminescensebasedmultiarrayplatform
_version_ 1724772645003591680