Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models

Abstract Global populations of wildlife are affected by human activity, land cover change, and climate change. Long‐term monitoring programs across large spatial scales are required to understand how these and other factors affect wildlife populations. Occupancy models are frequently used to monitor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jesse Whittington, Brenda Shepherd, Anne Forshner, Julien St‐Amand, Jennifer L. Greenwood, Cameron S. Gillies, Barb Johnston, Rhonda Owchar, Derek Petersen, James Kimo Rogala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-11-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2946
id doaj-3110a8b5c5294524a33e96b0a8a3625b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-3110a8b5c5294524a33e96b0a8a3625b2020-11-25T02:12:27ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252019-11-011011n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.2946Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy modelsJesse Whittington0Brenda Shepherd1Anne Forshner2Julien St‐Amand3Jennifer L. Greenwood4Cameron S. Gillies5Barb Johnston6Rhonda Owchar7Derek Petersen8James Kimo Rogala9Parks Canada Agency Banff National Park Banff Alberta CanadaParks Canada Agency Jasper National Park Jasper Alberta CanadaParks Canada Agency Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks Radium Hot Springs British Columbia CanadaParks Canada Agency Jasper National Park Jasper Alberta CanadaParks Canada Agency Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks Radium Hot Springs British Columbia CanadaTierra Environmental Consulting Windermere British Columbia CanadaParks Canada Agency Waterton Lakes National Park Waterton Alberta CanadaParks Canada Agency Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks Radium Hot Springs British Columbia CanadaParks Canada Agency Banff, Kootenay and Yoho National Parks Radium Hot Springs British Columbia CanadaParks Canada Agency Banff National Park Banff Alberta CanadaAbstract Global populations of wildlife are affected by human activity, land cover change, and climate change. Long‐term monitoring programs across large spatial scales are required to understand how these and other factors affect wildlife populations. Occupancy models are frequently used to monitor changes in species distribution while accounting for imperfect detection. Occupancy surveys can be expensive because they typically require multiple surveys to estimate the probability of detection. Time‐to‐detection models provide a promising approach for estimating occupancy because they require just one visit; however, few studies have tested or applied these models to wildlife data. We ran a simulation study to assess biases of time‐to‐event occupancy models for standardized avian point‐count surveys and then applied the models to 10 yr of data. Time to first detection occupancy models had minimal bias and almost nominal coverage for species with a mean time to first detection <8 min on surveys with 10 min of sampling. Biases and root mean squared error increased with increasing time to first detection. We applied a single species, multi‐year occupancy model to 34,665 detections of 77 landbird species collected across 500 km of latitude in five protected areas along the Rocky Mountains. Models from 64 species converged and had mean times to first detection <8 min. Average time to first detections was 3.2 min, which reflected a cumulative probability of detection of 0.96. Occupancy rates increased, decreased, and remained unchanged for 53%, 9%, and 38% of species, respectively. Overall, occupancy rates increased in 2015 and 2016 for short‐ and long‐distance migrants and decreased slightly for winter residents. Average decadal temperature and precipitation were important predictors for almost half of the species, while annual changes in spring temperature and precipitation affected 23% of species. Our studies demonstrate that time to first event occupancy models provide an efficient method for monitoring changes in distribution so long as encounter rates are much shorter than the survey duration. Our stable to increasing trends and strong responses to spring temperature and precipitation highlight the value of long‐term monitoring for understanding how changing climatic conditions affect wildlife.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2946climate changedetectionhierarchical modeloccupancyprotected areassongbird
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jesse Whittington
Brenda Shepherd
Anne Forshner
Julien St‐Amand
Jennifer L. Greenwood
Cameron S. Gillies
Barb Johnston
Rhonda Owchar
Derek Petersen
James Kimo Rogala
spellingShingle Jesse Whittington
Brenda Shepherd
Anne Forshner
Julien St‐Amand
Jennifer L. Greenwood
Cameron S. Gillies
Barb Johnston
Rhonda Owchar
Derek Petersen
James Kimo Rogala
Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
Ecosphere
climate change
detection
hierarchical model
occupancy
protected areas
songbird
author_facet Jesse Whittington
Brenda Shepherd
Anne Forshner
Julien St‐Amand
Jennifer L. Greenwood
Cameron S. Gillies
Barb Johnston
Rhonda Owchar
Derek Petersen
James Kimo Rogala
author_sort Jesse Whittington
title Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
title_short Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
title_full Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
title_fullStr Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
title_full_unstemmed Landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
title_sort landbird trends in protected areas using time‐to‐event occupancy models
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Abstract Global populations of wildlife are affected by human activity, land cover change, and climate change. Long‐term monitoring programs across large spatial scales are required to understand how these and other factors affect wildlife populations. Occupancy models are frequently used to monitor changes in species distribution while accounting for imperfect detection. Occupancy surveys can be expensive because they typically require multiple surveys to estimate the probability of detection. Time‐to‐detection models provide a promising approach for estimating occupancy because they require just one visit; however, few studies have tested or applied these models to wildlife data. We ran a simulation study to assess biases of time‐to‐event occupancy models for standardized avian point‐count surveys and then applied the models to 10 yr of data. Time to first detection occupancy models had minimal bias and almost nominal coverage for species with a mean time to first detection <8 min on surveys with 10 min of sampling. Biases and root mean squared error increased with increasing time to first detection. We applied a single species, multi‐year occupancy model to 34,665 detections of 77 landbird species collected across 500 km of latitude in five protected areas along the Rocky Mountains. Models from 64 species converged and had mean times to first detection <8 min. Average time to first detections was 3.2 min, which reflected a cumulative probability of detection of 0.96. Occupancy rates increased, decreased, and remained unchanged for 53%, 9%, and 38% of species, respectively. Overall, occupancy rates increased in 2015 and 2016 for short‐ and long‐distance migrants and decreased slightly for winter residents. Average decadal temperature and precipitation were important predictors for almost half of the species, while annual changes in spring temperature and precipitation affected 23% of species. Our studies demonstrate that time to first event occupancy models provide an efficient method for monitoring changes in distribution so long as encounter rates are much shorter than the survey duration. Our stable to increasing trends and strong responses to spring temperature and precipitation highlight the value of long‐term monitoring for understanding how changing climatic conditions affect wildlife.
topic climate change
detection
hierarchical model
occupancy
protected areas
songbird
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2946
work_keys_str_mv AT jessewhittington landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT brendashepherd landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT anneforshner landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT julienstamand landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT jenniferlgreenwood landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT cameronsgillies landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT barbjohnston landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT rhondaowchar landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT derekpetersen landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
AT jameskimorogala landbirdtrendsinprotectedareasusingtimetoeventoccupancymodels
_version_ 1724909240642961408